Focused imaging of electrical resistivity data in archaeological prospecting

Journal of Applied Geophysics

Volumn 41, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 215-227

  Kampke, A ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Archaeology; Electrical resistivity; Electrode array; Focusing array; Inversion

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MAPPING;

ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTING; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY DATA; FOCUSED IMAGING; INVERSION;

ELECTRIC PROSPECTING;

ARCHAEOLOGY; ELECTRICAL METHOD; RESISTIVITY;

EID: 0033004292     PISSN: 09269851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-9851(98)00043-3     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Acworth R.I., Griffiths D.H. Simple data processing of tripotential apparent resistivity measurements as an aid to the interpretation of subsurface structure. Geophysical Prospecting. 33:1985;861-887.
2. Barker R.D. The offset system of electrical resistivity sounding and its use with a multicore cable. Geophysical Prospecting. 29:1981;128-143.
3. Barker R.D. Depth of investigation of collinear symmetrical four-electrode arrays. Geophysics. 54:1989;1031-1037.
4. Edwards L.S. A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP. Geophysics. 42:1977;1320-1336.
5. Habberjam G.M., Watkins G.E. The reduction of lateral effects in resistivity probing. Geophysical Prospecting. 15:1967;221-235.
6. Kampke, A., 1996. Modellierung und Inversion von Daten der induzierten Polarisation für zweidimensionale Verteilungen der elektrischen Leitfhigkeit. Diplomarbeit. Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, Braunschweig.
7. Kuhnke F. The Pylos Regional Archaeological Project: Part II. Landscape evolution and site preservation/geophysical investigations. Hesperia. 66:1997;595-613.
8. Lehmann H. Potential representation by independent configurations on a multielectrode array. Geophys. J. Int. 120:1995;331-338.
9. Loke H.M., Barker R.D. Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections. Geophysics. 60:1995;1682-1690.
10. Peschel G. A new favourable combination of resistivity sounding and profiling in archaeological surveying. Fondazione Lerici, Roma 1967. Prospezione Archeologiche. 2:1967;23-28.
11. Roy A., Apparao A. Depth of investigation in direct current methods. Geophysics. 36:1971;943-959.
12. van der Sluis, A., van der Vorst, H.A., 1987. Numerical solution of large, sparse linear algebraic systems arising from tomographic problems. In: Nolet, G. (Ed.), Seismic Tomography. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 49-83.
13. Weller A., Seichter M., Kampke A. IP modelling using complex electrical conductivities. Geophys. J. Int. 127:1996;387-398.
14. Zhang J., Mackie R.L., Madden T.R. 3-D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients. Geophysics. 60:1995;1313-1325.