Within-patient longitudinal speech reception measures with continuous interleaved sampling processors for ineraid implanted subjects

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 228-237

  Pelizzone, Marco ^a   Cosendai, Grégoire ^a   Tinembart, Jacques ^b  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^b Engineering School of Geneva   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIENCE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; VOWEL;

ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033003595     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199906000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Boëx, C., Pelizzone, M., & Montandon, P. (1994). Improvements in speech recognition with the CIS strategy for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. In I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer & E. S. Hochmair (Eds.), Advances in cochlear implants (pp. 136-140). Wien: Manz.
2. Boëx, C., Pelizzone, M., & Montandon, P. (1996). Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. American Journal of Otology, 17, 61-68.
3. Dorman, M. F., & Loizou, P. C. (1997a). Changes in speech intelligibility as a function of time and signal processing strategy for an Ineraid patient fit with continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processors. Ear and Hearing, 18, 147-155.
4. Dorman, M. F., & Loizou, P. C. (1997b). Mechanisms of vowel recognition for Ineraid patients fit with continuous interleaved sampling processors. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 102, 581-587.
5. Eddington, D. K. (1980). Speech discrimination in deaf subject with cochlear implants. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 68, 885-891.
6. Miller, C. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338-352.
7. Montandon, P., Pelizzone, M., Kasper, A., & Rohr, A. (1992). Geneva experience with the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. ORL; Journal of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and its Related Specialties, 54, 314-316.
8. NIH Consensus Conference (1995). Cochlear implants in adults and children. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 1955-1961.
9. Pelizzone, M., Boëx, C., & Montandon, P. (1993). Vowel and consonant identification tests can be used to compare performances in a multilingual group of cochlear implant patients. ORL; Journal of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and its Related Specialties, 55, 341-346.
10. Pelizzone, M., Boëx-Spano, C., Sigrist, A., François, J., Tinembart, J., Degive, C., & Montandon, P. (1995). First field trials with a portable CIS processor for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), 115, 622-628.
11. Shannon, R. V. (1993). Psychophysics. In R. S. Tyler (Ed.), Cochlear implants: Audiological foundations (pp. 357-389). San Diego: Singular Publishing Inc.
12. Tye-Murray, N., Tyler, R. S., Woodworth, G. G., & Gantz, B. J. (1992). Performance over time with a Nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 13, 200-209.
13. Tyler, R. S., Preece, J. P., Lansing, C. R., Otto, S. R., & Gantz, B. J. (1986). Previous experience as a confounding factor in comparing cochlear implant processing schemes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 282-287.
14. Wilson, B. S., Finley, C. C., Lawson, D. T., Wolford, R. D., Eddington, D. K., & Rabinowitz, W. M. (1991). Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature, 352, 236-238.
15. Zierhofer, C. M., Hochmair-Desoyer, I. J., & Hochmair, E. S. (1995). Electronic design of a cochlear implant for multichannel high-rate pulsatile stimulation strategies. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 3, 112-116.