Exposure endpoint selection in acute dietary risk assessment

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 279-286

  Wolt, Jeffrey D ^a  

^a DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLORPYRIFOS; PESTICIDE RESIDUE;

ARTICLE; CHILD; DECISION MAKING; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOOD INTAKE; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; PESTICIDE SPRAYING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICOLOGY;

EID: 0033002255     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/rtph.1999.1299     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bolles, H. G., Wright, J. P., Keeler, L. C., Shaw, M. C., and Oliver, G. R. (1998). Tiered acute dietary exposure of pesticides - A consideration of current practice and opportunities for refinement, [submitted for publication]
2. CalEPA (1993). Residues in Fresh Produce, 1991. Department of Pesticide Regulation, California EPA, Sacramento.
3. Calabrese, E. J. (Ed.) (1996). Commemoration of the 50th anniversary of Monte Carlo. Special Edition. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2(4).
4. Edelmann, K. G., and Burmaster, D. E. (1997). Are all distributions of risk with the same 95th percentile equally acceptable? Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 3, 223-234.
5. Hattis, D., and Burmaster, D. E. (1994). Assessment of variability and uncertainty distributions for practical risk analysis. Risk Anal. 14, 713-730.
6. IBNMRR (1995). Third Report on Nutrition Monitoring in the United States. Interagency Board for Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research, Life Sciences Research Office, Federation of American Societies of Experimental Botany, Washington, DC.
7. Nies, J. (1993). Enhancement of the pesticide residues information system (PRIS). Contract Report No. 68-D2-0053. USEPA, Washington, DC.
8. Moshfegh, A. J. (1998). Use of estimates at extreme percentiles of food intake, [presentation to TRAC Work Group No. 1, 14 August 1998]
9. Seiler, F. A., and Alvarez, J. L. (1996). On the selection of distribution for stochastic variables, Risk Anal. 16, 5-18.
10. TRAC (1998). Monte-Carlo techniques and the 99.9th percentile. Staff Paper No. 3.1, Tolerance Reassessment Advisory Committee, Washington, DC. [28-29 May 1998]
11. USEPA (1996). Acute Dietary Exposure Assessment. Office of Pesticide Programs, USEPA. [Office Policy, June, 1996]
12. USEPA (1997). Guiding principles for Monte Carlo analysis. Risk Assessment Forum, USEPA. [EPA/630/R-97/001]
13. USEPA (1998a). A set of scientific issues being considered by the Agency in connection with policy for review of Monte Carlo analyses for dietary and exposure scenarios. [Final Report of the Science Advisory Panel Meeting of 24 March 1998] [http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/SAP/march/carlo.htm, United States Environmental Protection Agency]
14. USEPA (1998b). Guidance for Submission of Probabilistic Exposure Assessments to the Office of Pesticide Programs' Health Effects Division. Office of Pesticide Programs, USEPA. [draft of 6 Feb 1998]