Reduced visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis patients with optic neuritis: Comparison of functional magnetic resonance imaging and visual evoked potentials

Multiple Sclerosis

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 161-164

  Gareau, P J ^a   Gati, J S ^a   Menon, R S ^a   Lee, D ^a   Rice, G ^a   Mitchell, J R ^a   Mandelfino, P ^a   Karlik, S J ^a  

^a LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple sclerosis; Neurophysiological tests; Optic neuritis; Visual evoked potentials; Visual stimulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HUMAN; MOTOR SYSTEM; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NERVE POTENTIAL; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 0033001940     PISSN: 13524585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/135245859900500304     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J. (1973) The visual evoked response in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br Med J 4: 661-664.
2. Thorpe JW et al. (1995) Magnetization transfer ratios and transverse magnetization decay curves in optic neuritis: correlation with clinical findings and electrophysiology. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 59: 487-492.
3. Fillipi M et al. (1995) Correlations between changes in disability and T2-weighted brain MRI activity in multiple sclerosis: a follow up study. Neurology 45: 255-260.
4. Miller DH et al. (1996) Guidelines for the use of magnetic resonance techniques in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis. US National MS Society Task Force. Ann Neurol 39: 6-16.
5. Ogawa S, Menon RS, Kim SG, Ugurbil K. (1998) On the characteristics of functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 27: 447-474.
6. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. (1990) Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 9868-9872.
7. Kwong KK et al. (1992) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 5675-5679.
8. Strupp JP. (1996) Stimulate: A GUI based fMRI analysis software package. NeuroImage 3: S607.
9. Bandettini PA et al. (1993) Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain. Magn Reson Med 30: 161-173.
10. Rombouts SA et al. (1998) Visual activation patterns in patients with optic neuritis: an fMRI pilot study. Neurology 50: 1896-1899.
11. Langkilde A et al. (1998) Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FRI) of the visual cortex on patients with persistent, severe impairment of visual acuity, as a consequence of optic neuritis. Proceedings of the 14th Congress of ECTRIMS, P1056.
12. Yousry TA, Berry I, Fillipi M. (1998) Functional magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64: S85-S87.