Laparoscopic removal of an Angelchik prosthesis

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 615-617

  Underwood, R A ^a   Weinstock, L B ^a   Soper, N J ^a   Quasebarth, M A ^a   Brunt, L M ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Angelchik prosthetic ring; Gastroesophageal reflux; Laparoscopic surgery

Indexed keywords

FAMOTIDINE;

AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DIGESTIVE TRACT ENDOSCOPY; DYSPHAGIA; ESOPHAGUS DILATATION; ESOPHAGUS PROSTHESIS; ESOPHAGUS STENOSIS; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DEGLUTITION DISORDERS; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS;

EID: 0033000805     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004649901053     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Angelchik J-P, Cohen R (1979) A new surgical procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux and hiatal hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 148: 246-248
2. Berguer R, Stiegmann GV, Yamamoto M, Kim J, Mansour A, Denton J, Norton LW, Angelchik JP (1991) Minimal access surgery for gastroesophageal reflux: laparoscopic placement of the Angelchik prosthesis in pigs. Surg Endosc 5: 123-126
3. Collet D, Cadier̀e GB (1995) Conversions and complications of laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: formation for the development of laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease group. Am J Surg 169: 622-626
4. Durrans D, Armstrong CP, Taylor TV (1985) The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis: some reservations. Br J Surg 72: 525-527
5. Evan DF, Robertson CS, Morris DL, Ledingham SJ, Doran J, Hardcastle JD (1991) An objective long-term evaluation of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 73: 355-360
6. Eyre-Brook IA, Codling BW, Gear MWL (1993) Results of a prospective randomized trial of the Angelchik prosthesis and of a consecutive series of 199 patients. Br J Surg 80: 602-604
7. Gear MWL, Gillison EW, Dowling BL (1984) Randomized prospective trial of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis. Br J Surg 71: 681-683
8. Hill ADK, Walsh TN, Bolger CM, Byrne PJ, Hennessy TPJ (1994) Randomized controlled trial comparing Nissen fundoplication and the Angelchik prosthesis. Br J Surg 81: 72-74
9. Kmiot WA, Kirby RM, Akinola D, Temple JG (1991) Prospective randomized trial of Nissen fundoplication and Angelchik prosthesis in the surgical treatment of medically refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 78: 1181-1184
10. Lee JR, Temple JG (1993) The Angelchik prosthesis behaves as a fundoplication. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 75: 90-93
11. Morris DL, Robertson CS, Hardcastle JD (1987) National survey of use of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Br Med J 295: 308-309
12. Robertson C, Morris D (1989) Angelchik or not? In: Nyhus L (ed) Surgery annual. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, pp 119-134
13. Sapala JA, Sapala MA (1986) A quantitative assessment of the results with the Angelchik prosthesis [Letter]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 68: 172
14. Soper NJ, Brunt LM, Kerbl K (1994) Laparoscopic general surgery. N Engl J Med 330: 409-419
15. Stewart KC, Urschel JD, Hallgren RA (1994) Reoperation for complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 57: 1557-1558
16. Stuart RC, Dawson K, Keeling P, Byrne PJ, Hennessy TPJ (1989) A randomized prospective trial of Angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 76: 86-89
17. Timoney AG, Kelly JM, Welfare MR (1990) The Angelchik antireflux device: a 5-year experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72: 185-187