Cone receptor sensitivity is altered in form deprivation myopia in the chicken

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 76, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 326-338

  Westbrook, Aileen M ^a,c   Crewther, David P ^b   Crewther, Sheila G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

A wave; Chicken; ERG; Form deprivation myopia; Photoreceptors

Indexed keywords

DEPTH PERCEPTION; REFRACTION;

ELECTRORETINOGRAM; MYOPIA; PHOTORECEPTORS;

VISION;

RECEPTOR;

A SCAN; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; MALE; MYOPIA; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PHOTOTRANSDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA CONE; RETINOSCOPY;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; CONES (RETINA); DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; MALE; MYOPIA; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHOTOTRANSDUCTION; SENSORY DEPRIVATION;

EID: 0032999219     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199905000-00022     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Wallman J, Adams JI. Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks: susceptibility, recovery and relation to emmetropization. Vision Res 1987;27:1139-63.
2. Wallman J, Turkel J, Trachtman J. Extreme myopia produced by modest change in early visual experience. Science 1978;201: 1249-51.
3. Troilo D, Gottlieb MD, Wallman J. Visual deprivation causes myopia in chicks with optic nerve section. Curr Eye Res 1987;6:993-9.
4. Troilo D, Wallman J. Changes in corneal curvature during accommodation in chicks. Vision Res 1987;27:241-7.
5. Wallman J, Rosenthal D, Adams JI, Romagnano L. Role of accommodation and developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1981;28:197-206.
6. Troilo D. Experimental studies of emmetropization in the chick. In: Boch GR, Widdows J, eds. Myopia and the Control of Eye Growth. Chichester: Wiley, 1990:89-114.
7. Wildsoet CF, Howland HC, Falconer S, Dick K. Chromatic aberration and accommodation: their role in emmetropization in the chick. Vision Res 1993;33:1593-603.
8. Hodos W, Kuenzel WJ. Retinal-image degradation produces ocular enlargement in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984;25:652-9.
9. Gottlieb MD, Fugate-Wentzek LA, Wallman J. Different visual deprivations produce different ametropias and different eye shapes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:1225-35.
10. Troilo D, Wallman J. The regulation of eye growth and refractive state: an experimental study of emmetropization. Vision Res 1991; 31:1237-50.
11. Oishi T, Lauber JK. Chicks blinded with formoguanamine do not develop lid suture myopia. Curr Eye Res 1988;7:69-73.
12. Wildsoet CF, Pettigrew JD. Experimental myopia and anomalous eye growth patterns unaffected by optic nerve section in chickens: evidence for local control of eye growth. Clin Vision Sci 1988;3:99-107.
13. Crewther DP, Crewther SG. Pharmacological modification of eye growth in normally reared and visually deprived chicks. Curr Eye Res 1990;9:733-40.
14. Ehrlich D, Sattayasai J, Zappia J, Barrington M. Effects of selective neurotoxins on eye growth in the young chick. In: Boch GR, Widdows J, eds. Myopia and the Control of Eye Growth. Chichester: Wiley, 1990:63-88.
15. Westbrook AM, Crewther SG, Liang H, Beresford JA, Allen M, Keller I, Crewther DP. Formoguanamine-induced inhibition of deprivation myopia in chick is accompanied by choroidal thinning while retinal function is retained. Vision Res 1995;35:2075-88.
16. Shih YF, Fitzgerald ME, Reiner A. Identification of retinal layers controlling ocular growth in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34(Suppl):1209.
17. Li XX, Schaeffel F, Kohler K, Zrenner E. Dose-dependent effects of 6-hydroxydopamine on deprivation myopia, electroretinograms, and dopaminergic amacrine cells in chickens. Vis Neurosci 1992;9: 483-92.
18. Fujikado T, Omoto T, Tano Y. ERG of deprivation myopia in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34(Suppl):879.
19. Fujikado T, Hosohata J, Omoto T. ERG of form deprivation myopia and drug induced ametropia in chicks. Curr Eye Res 1996;15:79-86.
20. Breton ME, Montzka DP. Empiric limits of rod photocurrent component underlying a-wave response in the electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 1992;79:337-61.
21. Hood DC, Shady S, Birch DG. Understanding changes in the b-wave of the ERG caused by heterogeneous receptor damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:2477-88.
22. Liang H, Crewther DP, Crewther SG, Barila AM. A role for photoreceptor outer segments in the induction of deprivation myopia. Vision Res 1995;35:1217-25.
23. Wallman J, Wildsoet C, Xu A, Gottlieb MD, Nickla DL, Marran L, Krebs W, Christensen AM. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res 1995;35:37-50.
24. Shih YF, Fitzgerald ME, Norton TT, Gamlin PD, Hodos W, Reiner A. Reduction in choroidal blood flow occurs in chicks wearing goggles that induce eye growth toward myopia. Curr Eye Res 1993;12: 219-27.
25. Liang H, Crewther SG, Crewther DP, Pirie B. Morphology of the recovery from form deprivation myopia in the chick. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 1996;24:41-4.
26. Karpe G. The basis of clinical electroretinography. Acta Ophthalmol (Suppl) (Kbh) 1945;24:1-118.
27. Blach RK, Jay B, Kolb H. Electrical activity of the eye in high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1966;50:629-41.
28. Pallin O. The influence of the axial length of the eye on the size of the recorded b-potential in the clinical single flash electroretinogram. Acta Ophthalmol (Suppl) (Kbh) 1969;101:1-57.
29. Peterson H. The normal b-potential in the single-flash clinical electroretinogram. A computer technique study of the influence of sex and age. Acta Ophthalmol (Suppl) (Kbh) 1968;100:7-77.
30. Chen J-F, Elsner AE, Burns SA, Hansen RM, Lou PL, Kwong KK, Fulton AB. The effect of eye shape on retinal responses. Clin Vision Sci 1992;7:521-30.
31. Schaeffel F, Rohrer B, Lemmer T, Zrenner E. Diurnal control of rod function in the chicken. Vis Neurosci 1991;6:641-53.
32. Lamb TD, Pugh EN Jr. A quantitative account of the activation steps involved in phototransduction in amphibian photoreceptors. J Physiol (Lond) 1992;449:719-58.
33. Pugh EN Jr, Lamb TD. Amplification and kinetics of the activation steps in phototransduction. Biochim Biophys Acta 1993;1141: 111-49.
34. Hood DC, Birch DG. Human cone receptor activity: the leading edge of the a-wave and models of receptor activity. Vis Neurosci 1993;10:857-71.
35. Hood DC, Birch DG. Phototransduction in human cones measured using the α-wave of the ERG. Vision Res 1995;35:2801-10.
36. Granit R. The components of the retinal action potential in mammals and their relation to the discharge in the optic nerve. J Neurophysiol 1933;77:207-39.
37. Steinberg RH, Linsenmeier RA, Griff ER. Retinal pigment epithelial cell contributions to the electroretinogram and electrooculogram. Prog Retinal Res 1985;4:33-66.
38. Hood DC, Birch DG. The α-wave of the human electroretinogram and rod receptor function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31: 2070-81.
39. Glickstein M, Millodot M. Retinoscopy and eye size. Science 1970; 168:605-6.
40. Fulton AB, Fite KV, Bengston L. Retinal degeneration in the delayed amelanotic (DAM) chicken: an electroretinographic study. Curr Eye Res 1982;2:757-63.
41. Pilar G, Nunez R, McLennan IS, Meriney SD. Muscarinic and nicotinic synaptic activation of the developing chicken iris. J Neurosci 1987;7:3813-26.
42. Fulton AB, Rushton WA. Rod ERG of the mudpuppy: effect of dim red backgrounds. Vision Res 1978;18:785-92.
43. Kooijman AC. The homogeneity of the retinal illumination is restricted by some ERG lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986;27: 372-7.
44. Rohrer B, Schaeffel F, Zrenner E. Longitudinal chromatic aberration and emmetropization: results from the chicken eye. J Physiol (Lond) 1992;449:363-76.
45. Peachey NS, Alexander KR, Fishman GA, Derlacki DJ. Properties of the human cone system electroretinogram during light adaptation. Appl Opt 1989;28:1145-50.
46. Carr RE, Siegel IM. Visual Electrodiagnostic Testing: A Practical Guide for the Clinician. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1982.
47. Wyszecki G, Stiles WS. Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulas. New York: Wiley, 1967.
48. Rodieck RW. The Vertebrate Retina: Principles of Structure and Function. San Francisco: Freeman, 1973.
49. Kooijman AC. Light distribution on the retina of a wide-angle theoretical eye. J Opt Soc Am 1983;73:1544-50.
50. Marshall J, Mellerio J, Palmer DA. A schematic eye for the pigeon. Vision Res 1973;13:2449-53.
51. Pickett-Seltner RL, Weerheim J, Sivak JG, Pasternak J. Experimentally induced myopia does not affect post-hatching development of the chick lens. Vision Res 1987;27:1779-82.
52. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
53. Hood DC, Birch DG. Rod phototransduction in retinitis pigmentosa: estimation and interpretation of parameters derived from the rod a-wave. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:2948-61.
54. Dartnall HJA. The Visual Pigments. New York: Wiley, 1957.
55. Bowmaker JK, Knowles A. The visual pigments and oil droplets of the chicken retina. Vision Res 1977;17:755-64.
56. Liang HH. A model for gyrate atrophy and experimentally induced myopia. Masters thesis. University of New South Wales, Australia, 1993.
57. Fulton AB, Hansen RM, Findl O. The development of the rod photoresponse from dark-adapted rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36:1038-45.
58. Breton ME, Schueller AW, Lamb TD, Pugh EN Jr. Analysis of ERG a-wave amplification and kinetics in terms of the G-protein cascade of phototransduction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:295-309.
59. Huck SW, Cormier WH, Bounds WG Jr. Reading Statistics and Research. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.
60. Beresford JA, Crewther SG, Crewther DP. Anatomical correlates of experimentally induced myopia. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 1998; 26(Suppl 1):S84-7.
61. Fitzgerald ME, Vana BA, Reiner A. Evidence for retinal pathology following interruption of neural regulation of choroidal blood flow: Muller cells express GFAP following lesions of the nucleus of Edinger-Westphal in pigeons. Curr Eye Res 1990;9:583-98.
62. Breton ME, Quinn GE, Schueller AW. Development of electroretinogram and rod phototransduction response in human infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:1588-602.
63. Findl O, Hansen RM, Fulton AB. The effects of acetazolamide on the electroretinographic responses in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:1019-26.
64. Cobbs WH, Pugh EN Jr. Kinetics and components of the flash photocurrent of isolated retinal rods of the larval salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum. J Physiol (Lond) 1987;394:529-72.
65. Penn RD, Hagins WA. Kinetics of the photocurrent of retinal rods. Biophys J 1972;12:1073-94.
66. Yinon U, Koslowe KC, Lobel D, Landshman N, Barishak YR. Lid suture myopia in developing chicks: optical and structural considerations. Curr Eye Res 1982;2:877-82.
67. Noller NJ. Eye enlargement in the chick following visual deprivation. Masters thesis. University of Melbourne, Australia, 1984.
68. Teakle EM, Wildsoet CF, Vaney DI. The spatial organization of tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive amacrine cells in the chicken retina and the consequences of myopia. Vision Res 1993;33: 2383-96.
69. Lin T, Grimes PA, Stone RA. Expansion of the retinal pigment epithelium in experimental myopia. Vision Res 1993;33:1881-5.
70. Horowitz BR. Theoretical considerations of the retinal receptor as a waveguide. In: Enoch JM, Tobey FL Jr, eds. Vertebrate Photoreceptor Optics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981:219-300.
71. Baylor DA, Hodgkin AL. Detection and resolution of visual stimuli by turtle photoreceptors. J Physiol (Lond) 1973;234:163-98.
72. Baylor DA, Lamb TD, Yau KW. The membrane current of single rod outer segments. J Physiol (Lond) 1979;288:589-611.
73. Banks MS, Bennett PJ. Optical and photoreceptor immaturities limit the spatial and chromatic vision of human neonates. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1988;5:2059-79.
74. Pugh EN. Vision: physics and retinal physiology. In: Atkinson RC, Herrenstein RJ, Lindzey G, Luce RD, eds. Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology. 2nd ed. Vol 1. New York: Wiley, 1988: 75-163.
75. Snyder AW, Pask C. The Stiles-Crawford effect - explanation and consequences. Vision Res 1973;13:1115-37.
76. Enoch JM, Lakshminarayanan V. Retinal fibre optics. In: Cronly-Dillon J, ed. Vision and Visual Dysfunction. Vol 1. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1991:280-309.
77. Morris VB. Symmetry in a receptor mosaic demonstrated in the chick from the frequencies, spacing and arrangement of the types of retinal receptor. J Comp Neurol 1970;140:359-98.
78. Kahn AJ. An autoradiographic analysis of the time of appearance of neurons in the developing chick neural retina. Dev Biol 1974;38: 30-40.
79. Winston R. The visual receptor as a light collector. In: Enoch JM, Tobey FL Jr, eds. Vertebrate Photoreceptor Optics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981:325-36.
80. Wallman J. Retinal control of eye growth and refraction. Prog Retinal Res 1993;12:133-53.