Bone remodeling theory applied to the study of n unit-elements model

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 743-747

  Zidi, M ^a   Ramtani, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

Author keywords

Modelization; Remodeling law; Stability; Trabecular bone

Indexed keywords

BONE; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

BONE REMODELING;

BIOMECHANICS;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BONE REMODELING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 0032995060     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00033-0     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Carter, D.R., 1987. Mechanical loading histories and skeletal biology. Journal of Biomechanics 20, 785-794.
2. Cappello, A., Viceconti, M., Nanni, F., Catania, G., 1998. Global asymptotic stability of bone remodeling theories: a new approach based on non linear dynamical systems analysis. Journal of Biomechanics 31, 289-194.
3. Cowin, S.C., Hegedus, D.M., 1976. Bone remodeling I: a theory of adaptative elasticity. Journal of Elasticity 6, 313-325.
4. Cowin, S.C., Moss-Salentijn, L., Moss, M.L., 1991. Candidates for the mechanosensory system in bone. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 113, 191-197.
5. Cowin, S.C., 1993. Bone stress adaptation models. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 115, 528-533.
6. Currey, J.D., 1988. The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus elasticity of compact bone. Journal of Biomechanics 21, 131-139.
7. Fyhrie, D.P., Shaffler, M.B., 1995. The adaptation of bone apparent density to applied load. Journal of Biomechanics 28, 135-146.
8. Galileo, G., 1638. Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche in torno à due nuove scienze attenenti alla mecanica e i movimenti locali. Elzevier, Leida.
9. Harrigan, T.P., Hamilton, J.J., 1992. An analytical and numerical study of the stability of bone remodeling theories: dependence on microstructural stimulus. Journal of Biomechanics 25, 447-488.
10. Lindner, J. F., Ditto, W. L., 1995. Removal, suppression, and control of chaos by non linear design. Applied Mechanical Review 48, 795-807.
11. Mullender, M.G., Huiskes, R., Weinans, H., 1994. A physiological approach to the simulation of bone remodeling as self organizational control process. Journal of Biomechanics 27, 1389-1394.
12. Strang, G., 1986. Introduction to Applied Mathematics, Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Cambridge, USA.
13. Taber, L., 1995. Biomechanics of growth, remodeling, and morphogenesis, Applied Mechanics Review 48, 487-545.
14. Weinans, H., Huiskes, R., Grootenboer, H.J., 1992. The behavior of adaptative bone remodeling simulation models. Journal of Biomechanics 25, 1425-1441.
15. Wolff, J.L., (original publication in 1892) 1986. The Law of Bone Remodeling (traducted by Marquet, P., Furlong, R.). Springer, Berlin.
16. Zidi, M., 1998. Contribution to the modelization of trabecular bone remodeling, Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences Paris t.326, Série II b, 121-128.