Abstracts of trials presented at the Vth World Congress of Psychiatry (Mexico, 1971): A cohort study

Psychological Medicine

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 491-494

  Diezel, K ^a   Pharoah, F M ^a   Adams, Clive E ^a  

^a Summertown Pavilion ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT REPORT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA BASE; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PSYCHIATRY; RANDOMIZATION;

CLINICAL TRIALS; COHORT STUDIES; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; MEXICO; PSYCHIATRY; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0032989149     PISSN: 00332917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291798007582     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Antman, E. M., Lau, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F. & Chalmers, T. C. (1992). A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Medical Association 268, 240-248.
2. Chalmers, I. (1989). Evaluating the effects of care during pregnancy and childbirth. In Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth (ed. 1. Chalmers, M. Elkin and M. J. N. C. Keirse), pp. 3-38. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
3. Chalmers, T. C., Celano, P., Sacks, H. S. & Smith, H. Jr. (1983). Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine 309, 1358-1361.
4. Clarke, M. & Greaves, L. (1995). Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 310, 741.
5. Cochrane Library (1996). The [CDROM]. The Cochrane Collaboration. (1996-. Updated quarterly.) Update Software: Oxford.
6. Counsell, C. & Fraser, H. (1995). Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 310, 126.
7. Dickersin, K. (1990). The existence of publications and risk factors for its occurrence. Journal of the American Medical Association 263, 1385-1389.
8. Dickersin, K., Chan, S., Chalmers, T. C., Sacks, H. S. & Smith, H. Jr. (1987). Publication bias and clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 8, 343-353.
9. Easterbrook, P. J., Berlin, J. A., Gopalan, R. & Matthews, D. R. (1991). Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 337, 867-872.
10. Egger, M., Zellweger-Zahner, T., Schneider, M., Junker, C., Lengeler, C. & Antes, G. (1997). Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet 350, 326-329.
11. Mulrow, C. D. (1987). The medical review: state of the science. Annals of Internal Medicine 106, 485-488.
12. Peto, R. (1987). Why do we need systematic reviews of randomized trials? Statistics in Medicine, 6, 233-240.
13. Scherer, R. W., Dickersin, K. & Langenberg, P. (1994). Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Journal of the American Medical Association 272, 158-162.
14. Schulz, K. F., Chalmers, I., Grimes, D. A. & Altman, D. G. (1994). Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals. Journal of the American Medical Association 272, 125-128.
15. WHO Scientific Group on Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders. (1991). Evaluation of Methods for the Treatment of Mental Disorders. WHO: Geneva.