Discrimination between fluid, synovium, and cartilage in patients with rheumatoid Arthritis: Contrast enhanced spin echo versus non-contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed gradient echo MR imaging

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 107-110

  Rand, T ^a   Imhof, H ^a   Czerny, C ^a   Breitenseher, M ^a   Machold, K ^a   Turetschek, K ^a   Trattnig, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cartilage synovium fluid discrimination; MRI; Rheumatoid arthritis

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARTILAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT EFFUSION; KNEE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SYNOVIAL FLUID; SYNOVIUM;

EID: 0032987768     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9260(99)91070-X     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. th ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill Inc; 1991;1437-1444.
2. Beltran J, Caudill JL, Herman LA et al. Rheumatoid arthritis: MR imaging manifestations. Radiology 1987;165:153-157.
3. Mundinger A, Ioannidou M, Meske S et al. MRI of knee arthritis in rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthopathies. Rheumatol Int 1991;11:183-186.
4. Poleskie L, Zdravkovic D, Jablanovic D. Magnetic resonance imaging of bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with radiography. Skeletal Radiology 1993;22:577-580.
5. Reiser MF, Bongartz GP, Erlermann R. Gadolinium-DTPA in rheumatoid arthritis and related diseases: first results with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol 1989;18:591-597.
6. König H, Bolze X, Sieper J et al. Quantitativ evaluierte dynamische Magnetresonanztomographie bei chronischer Polyarthritis des Kniegelenkes. Fortschritte Röntgenstrahlen 1992;157:140-144.
7. König H, Sieper J, Wolf KJ. Rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of hypervascular and fibrous pannus with dynamic MR imaging enhanced with GD-DTPA. Radiology 1990;176:473-477.
8. Ostergard M, Lorenzen I, Henriksen O. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in active and inactive immunoinflammatory gonarthritis. Acta Radiologica 1993;35:275-281.
9. Waterton JC, Rajanayagam V, Ross BD et al. Magnetic resonance methods for measurement of disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1993;11:1033-1038.
10. Peterfy CG, Majumdar S, Lang P et al. MR imaging of the arthritic knee: improved discrimination of cartilage, synovium, and effusion with pulsed saturation transfer and fat-suppressed T1 weighted sequences. Radiology 1994;191:413-419.
11. Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Janzen DL et al. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fatsuppressed MR imaging. Optimization and validation. Radiology 1994;192:485-491.
12. Adam G, Dammer M, Bohndorf K et al. Rheumatoid arthritis of the knee: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:125-129.
13. Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Riccio T, Weisman MH et al. Rheumatoid knee: role of gadopentate-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1990;176:831-835.
14. Drape JL, Thelen P, Gay-Depassier. Intraarticular diffusion of GD-DOTA after intravenous injection in the knee: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1993;188:227-234.
15. Hu BS, Conolly SM, Wright GA. Pulsed saturation transfer contrast. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1992;26:231-240.
16. Woolf SD, Chesnick S, Frank JA et al. Magnetization transfer contrast: MR imaging of the knee. Radiology 1991;179:623-628.
17. Yeung HN, Aisen AM. Magnetization transfer contrast with periodic pulsed saturation. Radiology 1992;183:209-214.