The effects of pictorial versus tangible stimuli in stimulus-preference assessments

Research in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 63-72

  Higbee, Thomas S ^a   Carr, James E ^a   Harrison, Cristin D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; OBSERVER VARIATION; REINFORCEMENT; STIMULUS;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RETARDATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); TOUCH;

EID: 0032986115     PISSN: 08914222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0891-4222(98)00032-8     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. DeLeon I.G., Iwata B.A. Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 29:1996;519-533.
2. DeLeon I.G., Iwata B.A., Roscoe E.M. Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 30:1997;475-484.
3. Fisher W.W., Piazza C.C., Bowman L.G., Amari A. Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. American Journal on Mental Retardation. 101:1996;15-25.
4. Fisher W.W., Piazza C.C., Bowman L.G., Hagopian L.P., Owens J.C., Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 25:1992;491-498.
5. Northup J., George T., Jones K., Broussard C., Vollmer T.R. A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods The utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 29:1996;201-212.
6. Pace G.M., Ivancic M.T., Edwards G.L., Iwata B.A., Page T.A. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 18:1985;249-255.
7. Windsor J., Piche L.M., Locke P.A. Preference testing A comparison of two presentation methods . Research in Developmental Disabilities. 15:1994;439-455.