Teacher intervention for Reception children predicted to experience literacy difficulties

European Journal of Special Needs Education

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 49-60

  Webster, Alec ^a   Feiler, Anthony Charles ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b BATH SPA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Early literacy; Expectations; Intervention; Reading difficulties; Reception children; Teacher predictions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; HOME; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LEARNING; LEARNING DISORDER; POLICY; PREDICTION; PRIMARY SCHOOL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; TEACHING; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0032983309     PISSN: 08856257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0885625990140105     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AINSCOW, M. (1997). 'Towards inclusive schooling', British Journal of Special Education, 24, 1, 3-6.
2. AINSCOW, M. and MUNCIE, J. (1989). Meeting Individual Needs. London: David Fulton.
3. ALEXANDER, R., ROSE, J. and WOODHEAD, C. (1992). Curriculum Organisation and Classroom Practice in Primary Schools: A Discussion Paper. London: DES.
4. BALL, J. (1994). Education Reform: A Critical and Post-Structural Approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
5. BIBBY, P. and LUNT, I. (1996). Working for Children: Securing Provision for Children with Special Educational Needs. London: David Fulton.
6. BLATCHFORD, P., BURKE, J., FARQUHAR, C., PLEWIS, I. and TIZARD, B. (1989). 'Teacher-expectations in infant school: association with attainment and progress, curriculum coverage and classroom interaction', British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 1, 19-30.
7. BROPHY, J.E. and GOOD, T.L. (1974). Teacher-Student Relationships: Causes and Consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
8. CLOUGH, N., LEE, V., MENTER, I., TRODD, T. and WHITTY, G. (1989). 'Restructuring the education system?' In: BASH, L. and COULBY, D. (Eds) The Education Reform Act: Competition and Control. London: Cassell.
9. DAWES, R.M. (1982). 'The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making'. In: KAHNEMAN, D., SLOVIC, P. and TVERSKY, A. (Eds) Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. DESFORGES, C. (1988). 'Psychology and the management of classrooms'. In: JONES, N. and SAYER, J. (Eds) Management and the Psychology of Schooling. London: Falmer Press.
11. DOWIE, J. and ELSTEIN, A. (1988). 'Introduction'. In: DOWIE, J. and ELSTEIN, A. (Eds) Professional Judgement: A Reader in Clinical Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. DOYLE, W. (1986). 'Classroom organisation and management'. In: WITTROCK, M. (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Macmillan.
13. DRUMMOND, M. J. (1992). 'Assessing learning in the early years', Forum, 34, 3, 66-68.
14. DYER, C. (1995). 'The Code of Practice through LEA eyes', British Journal of Special Education, 22, 2, 48-51.
15. DYSON, A. and GAINS, C. (Eds) (1993). Rethinking Special Needs in Mainstream Schools: Towards the Year 2000. London: David Fulton.
16. FEILER, A. and WEBSTER, A. (in press). 'Teacher predictions of young children's literacy success or failure', Assessment in Education.
17. GOOD, T.L. (1987). 'Two decades of research on teacher-expectations: findings and future directions', Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 4, 32-47.
18. GORMAN, T. and FERNANDES, C. (1992). Reading in Recession: A Report on the Comparative Reading Survey from the Centre for Research in Language and Communication, National Foundation for Educational Research. Slough: NFER.
19. GREAT BRITAIN. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION (1994). Code of Practice on the Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs. London: DFE.
20. GREAT BRITAIN. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE. HER MAJESTY'S INSPECTORATE (1992). Getting in on the Act - Provision for Pupils with Special Educational Needs: The National Picture. London: HMSO.
21. HORNBY, G. (1995). 'The Code of Practice: boon or burden?', British Journal of Special Education, 22, 3, 116-119.
22. KAHNEMAN, D. and TVERSKY, A. (1982). 'Subjective probability: a judgement of representativeness'. In: KAHNEMAN, D., SLOVIC, P. and TVERSKY, A. (Eds) Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. LUNT, I. and EVANS, J. (1991). Special Educational Needs under LMS. London: Institute of Education.
24. OFFICE FOR STANDARDS IN EDUCATION (OFSTED) (1996). The Implementation of the Code of Practice for Pupils with Special Educational Needs. London: HMSO.
25. SARACHO, O.N. (1991). 'Teacher-expectations of students' performance: a review of research', Early Child Development and Care, 76, 1, 27-41.
26. SCHOOL EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENT COUNCIL (SCAA) (1997). Baseline Assessment Scales. London: SCAA.
27. SHAVELSON, R.J. and STERN, P. (1981). 'Research on teachers' pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behaviour', Review of Educational Research, 51, 4, 455-498.
28. SOLITY, J. (1992). Special Education. London: Cassell.
29. STANOVICH, K. (1995). 'How research might inform the debate about early reading acquisition', Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 2, 87-105.
30. TURNER, M. (1990). Sponsored Reading Failure. Warlingham: IPSET Education Unit.
31. TURNER, M. (1991). 'Finding out', Support for Learning, 6, 3, 99-102.
32. WEBSTER, A., BEVERIDGE, M. and REED, M. (1995). 'Contrasting conceptions of literacy in primary and secondary schools', Journal of Research in Reading, 19, 1, 36-45.
33. WEBSTER, A., BEVERIDGE, M. and REED, M. (1996). Managing the Literacy Curriculum: How Schools Can Become Communities of Readers and Writers. London: Routledge.
34. WILLEY, M. (1989). 'LMS: a rising sense of alarm', British Journal of Special Education, 16, 4, 136-138.
35. WOLFENDALE, S. (1993). Baseline Assessment: A Review of Current Practice, Issues and Strategies for Effective Implementation. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.