Use of pelvic surface coil MR imaging for assessment of clinically localized prostate cancer with histopathological correlation

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 164-169

  Rorvik J ^a,b   Halvorsen, O J ^b   Albrektsen, G ^b   Ersland, L ^b   Daehlin L ^b   Haukaas, S ^b  

^a HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cancer; Magnetic resonance; Prostate; Staging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; PROSTATECTOMY;

EID: 0032982702     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9260(99)91007-3     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Byar DP, Mostofi FK and the Veterans Administration Cooperative Research Group. Carcinoma of the prostrate: prognostic evaluation of certain pathologic features in 208 radical prostatectomies. Examined by the step-section technique. Cancer 1972;10:5-13.
2. Jewett HJ, Bridge RW, Gray GF et al. The palpable nodule of prostatic cancer. Results 15 years after radical excision. JAMA 1968;203:403-406.
3. Prout GR, Heaney JA, Griffin PP et al. Nodal involvement as a prognostic indicator in patients with prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 1980;124:226-231.
4. Zietman AL, Shipley WU, Willet CG. Residual disease after radical surgery or radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Cancer 1993;71(3 suppl):959-969.
5. Emory TH, Reinke DB, Hill AL et al. Use of CT to reduce understaging in prostatic cancer: comparison with conventional staging techniques. Am J Radial 1983;141:351-354.
6. Rifkin MD, Zerhouni EA, Gatsonis CA et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. Results of a Multi-institutional Cooperative trail. N Engl J Med 1990;323:621-625.
7. Rørvik J, Halvorsen OJ, Espeland A et al. Inability of refined CT to assess local extent of prostatic cancer. Acta Radiol 1993;34:39-42.
8. Rørvik J, Halvorsen OJ, Servoll E et al. Transrectal ultrasonography to assess local extent of prostatic cancer before radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol 1994;73:65-69.
9. Bezzi M, Kressel HY, Allen KS et al. Prostatic carcinoma: Staging with MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1988;169:339-346.
10. Biondetti PR, Lee JKT, Ling D et al. Clinical Stage B Prostate Carcinoma: Staging with MR Imaging. Radiology 1987;162:325-329.
11. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB et al. Critical analysis of the ability of the endorectal coil Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan to predict pathologic stage, margin status, and postoperative prostate specific antigen failure in patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:1770-1777.
12. Hricak H, Dooms GC, Jeffrey RB et al. Prostatic carcinoma: Staging by clinical assessment, CT and MR Imaging. Radiology 1987;162:331-336.
13. Chelsky MJ, Schnall MD, Seidmon EJ et al. Use of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. J Urol 1993;150:391-395.
14. Outwater EK, Petersen RO, Siegelman ES et al. Prostate carcinoma: assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images. Radiology 1994;193:333-339.
15. Quinn SF, Franzini DA, Demlow TA et al. MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: Correlation with whole-mount specimens. Radiology 1994;190:323-327.
16. Schiebler ML, Schnall MD, Pollack HM et al Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Radiology 1993;189:339-352.
17. Tempany CM, Zhou X, Zerhouni EA et al. Staging of prostate cancer: results of Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group project comparison of three MR imaging techniques. Radiology 1994;1992:47-54.
18. Mostofi RK, Sesterhenn IA, Sobin LH. Histologic Typing of Prostate Tumours. In: International Histological Classification of Tumours No. 22. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1980.
19. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. TNM Classification of Malignant tumours. 5th ed. New York, Wiley-Liss, 1997.
20. Altman DG. Diagnostic tests. In: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. 1st ed. London, Chapman & Hall, 1991:409-419.
21. Hricak H, White S, Vigneron D et al. Carcinoma of the Prostate Gland: MR Imaging with Pelvic Phased-Array Coils versus Integrated Endorectal-Pelvic Phased-Array Coils. Radiology 1994;193:703-709.
22. Langlotz C, Schnall M, Pollack H. Staging of Prostatic Cancer: Accuracy of MR Imaging. Radiology 1995;194:645-646.
23. Tempany CM, Gatsonis C, McNeil BJ. Reply. Radiology 1995;194:647-648.
24. Tempany CM, Rahmouni AD, Epsstein JI et al. Invasion of the Neurovascular Bundle by Prostate Cancer: Evaluation with MR Imaging. Radiology 1991;181:107-112.
25. Yu KK, Hricak H, Alagappan R et al. Detection of Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Carcinoma with Endorectal and Phased-Array Coil MR Imaging: Multivariate Feature analysis. Radiology 1997;202:697-702.
26. Hering F, Rist M, Roth Mihatsch M et al. Does microinvasion of the capsule and/or micrometastases in regional lymphy nodes influence disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol 1990;66:177-181.
27. Epstein JI, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 1993;71:3582-3593.
28. Bostwick DG, Qian J, Bergstralh E et al. Prediction of capsular perforation and seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer. J Urol 1996;155:1361-1367.