Utility of MIB-1 in evaluating cauterized cervical cone biopsy margins

International Journal of Gynecological Pathology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 211-214

  Mittal, Khush ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BELLEVUE HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Artifact; Cautery; Cervix; Condyloma; Dysplasia; LEEP; MIB 1

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDYLOMA; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOMETRIUM; HUMAN TISSUE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX DISEASE; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA;

EID: 0032982311     PISSN: 02771691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004347-199907000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Vedel P, Jakobsen H, Kryger-Baggesen N, Rank F, Bostofte E. Five-year follow up of patients with cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia in the cone margins after conization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993;50:71-6.
2. Demopoulos RI, Horowitz LF, Vamvakas EC. Endocervical gland involvement by cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Predictive value for residual and/or recurrent disease. Cancer 1991;68: 1932-6.
3. Thomas PA, Zaleski MS, Ohlhausen WW, Raab SS, Benda JA. Cytomorphologic characteristics of thermal injury related to endocervical brushing following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Diagn Cytopathol 1996;14:212-5.
4. Mittal K, Palazzo J. Cervical condylomas show higher proliferation than do inflamed or metaplastic cervical squamous epithelium. Mod Pathol 1998;11:780-3.
5. Dunton CJ, van Hoeven KH, Kovatich AJ, Oliver RE, Scacheri RQ, Cater JR, Carlson JA Jr. Ki-67 antigen staining as an adjunct to identifying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 1997;64:451-5.
6. Garzetti GG, Ciavattini A, De Nictolis M, Lucarini G, Goteri G, Romanini C, Biagini G. MIB 1 immunostaining in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: prognostic significance in mild and moderate lesions. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996;42:261-6.
7. Payne S, Kernohan NM, Walker F. Proliferation in the normal cervix and in preinvasive cervical lesions. J Clin Pathol 1996;49: 667-71.
8. Costa MJ. MN and Ki67 (MIB-1) in uterine cervix carcinoma: novel biomarkers with divergent utility. Hum Pathol 1996;27: 217-9.
9. al-Saleh W, Delvenne P, Greimers R, Fridman V, Doyen J, Boniver J. Assessment of Ki-67 antigen immunostaining in squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. Correlation with the histologic grade and human papillomavirus type. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;104:154-60.
10. Resnick M, Lester S, Tate JE, Sheets EE, Sparks C, Crum CP. Viral and histopathologic correlates of MN and MIB-1 expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Hum Pathol 1996;27:234-9.
11. Mittal K, Demopoulos RI, Tata M. Comparison of proliferative activity and atypical mitoses in cervical condylomas with various human papillomavirus types. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1998;17:24-8.
12. Mittal KR, Goswami S, Demopolous RI. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression in normal and abnormal cervical squamous epithelia. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17:117-22.