Significance of forebrain structures in acoustically guided behavior in anurans

European Journal of Morphology

Volumn 37, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 177-181

  Walkowiak, W ^a   Berlinger, M ^a   Schul, J ^b   Gerhardt, H C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Female phonotaxis; Male vocal response; Preoptic area; Septum; Striatum

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORPUS STRIATUM; FOREBRAIN; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; MOTOR CONTROL; NEUROANATOMY; NONHUMAN; PREOPTIC AREA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPTUM PELLUCIDUM;

ANIMALIA; ANURA;

EID: 0032980666     PISSN: 09243860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/ejom.37.2.177.4740     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Allison JD, Wilczynski W (1991): Thalamic and midbrain auditory projections to the preoptic area and ventral hypothalamus in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). Brain Behav Evol 38: 322-331.
2. Bruce LL, Neary TJ (1995): The limbic system of tetrapods: A comparative analysis cortical and amygdalar populations. Brain Behav Evol 46: 224-234.
3. Brzoska J (1984): The electrodermal response and other behavioral responses of the grass frog to natural and synthetic calls. Zool Jb Physiol 88: 179-192.
4. Brzoska J, Schneider H, Nevo E (1982): Territorial behavior and vocal response in male Hyla arborea savignyi (Amphibia: Anura). Isr J Zool 31: 27-37.
5. Davis MS (1988): Acoustically mediated neighbor recognition in the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21: 185-190.
6. Flindt R, Hemmer H (1972): Untersuchungen zur Reaktion von Bufo calamita und Bufo viridis auf arteigene Rufe. Biol Zbl 91: 597-600.
7. Gerhardt HC (1994): Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim Behav 47: 959-969.
8. Luksch H, Walkowiak, W, Muñoz A, ten Donkelaar HJ (1996): The use of in vitro preparations of the isolated amphibian central nervous system in neuroanatomy and electrophysiology. J Neurosci Meth 70: 91-102.
9. Luksch H, Walkowiak W (1998): Morphology and axonal projection patterns of auditory neurons in the midbrain of the painted frog, Discoglossus pictus. Hearing Res 122: 1-17.
10. Matsumoto N, Schwippert WW, Beneke TW, Ewert JP (1991): Forebrain-mediated control of visually guided prey-catching in toads: investigation of striato-pretectal connections with intracellular recording/labeling methods. Behav Proc 25: 27-40.
11. Marín O, Smeets WJ, Gonzalez A (1998): Basal ganglia organization in amphibians: chemoarchitecture. J Comp Neurol 392: 285-312.
12. Mudry KM, Capranica RR (1980): Evoked auditory activity within the telencephalon of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). Brain Res 182: 303-311.
13. Perrill SA, Gerhardt HC, Daniel R (1982): Mating strategy shifts in male green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea): An experimental study. Anim Behav 30: 43-48.
14. Schmidt RS (1988): Mating call phonotaxis in female American toads: lesions of central auditory system. Brain Behav Evol 32: 119-128.
15. Traub B, Elepfandt A (1990): Sensory neglect in a frog: evidence for early evolution of attentional processes in vertebrates. Brain Res 530: 105-107.
16. Walkowiak W, Münz H (1985): The significance of water surface-waves in the communication of fire-bellied toads. Naturwissenschaften 72: 49-50.