Spatial influences on motor and language function

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 695-706

  Coslett, H Branch ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Hemispace; Language; Neglect; Spatial compatibility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN REGION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PARIETAL LOBE; RIGHT HEMISPHERE;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEREBRAL INFARCTION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COGNITION DISORDERS; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0032980044     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00116-X     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Andersen RA, Snyder LH, Bradley DC, Xing J. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1997;20:303-30.
2. Andrade J, Meudell P. Is spatial information encoded automatically in memory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1993;46:365-75.
3. Anzola GP, Bertolini G, Buchtel HA, Rizzolatti G. Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction times. Neuropsychologia 1977;15:295-302.
4. Bisiach E. Mental representations in unilateral neglect and related disorders: The twentieth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal Experimental Psychology 1993;36A:435-61.
5. Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC, Pierson JM, Wison LE. Overt and covert attention and virotactile reaction times: gaze direction, spatial compatibility and hemispatial asymmetry. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1987;42:44-56.
6. Chatterjee A, Maher L, Heilman KM. Spatial characteristics of thematic role assignment. Neuropsychologia 1995;33:643-8.
7. Chatterjee A, Maher LM, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Heilman KM. Asyntactic thematic role assignment: The use of a temporal-spatial strategy. Brain and Language 1995;49:125-39.
8. Coslett HB, Schwartz MF, Goldberg G, Haas D, Perkins J. Multimodal hemispatial deficits after left hemisphere stroke. Brain 1993;116:527-54.
9. Damasio H, Damasio AR. Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, 1989.
10. Driver J. Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading. Nature 1996;381:66-8.
11. Duhamel J, Colby CL, Goldberg ME. Congruent representations of visual and somatosensory space in single neurons of monkey ventral intra-parietal cortex (area VIP) In: Paillard J, editor. Brain and space. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, 1991:223-36.
12. Fitts PM, Seeger CM. Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1953;46:193-210.
13. Gardner EB, Ward AW. Spatial compatibility in tactile-visual discrimination. Neuropsychologia 1979;17:421-5.
14. Goldberg ME, Colby CL, Duhamel JR. Representation of visuomotor space in the parietal lobe of the monkey. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 1990;LV:729-39.
15. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Left visuo-spatial neglect: a meaningless entity? Cortex 1992;28:525-35.
16. Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E, editors. Neglect and related disorders. New York: Oxford Univ Press, 1993:279-336.
17. Hublet C, Morais J, Bertelson P. Spatial constraints on focused attention: Beyond the right-side advantage. Perception 1976;5:3-8.
18. James W. The principles of psychology. New York: Holt and Co, 1890.
19. Jeannerod M. The posterior parietal areas as a spatial generator. In: Ingle DJ, Jeannerod M, Lee DN, editors. Brain mechanisms and spatial vision. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985:279-98.
20. Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1983.
21. Landau B, Jackendoff R. 'What' and 'where' in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Science 1993;16:217-65.
22. Maher LM, Chatterjee A, Gonzalez Rothi LJ, Heilman KM. Agrammatic sentence comprehension: the use of a temporal-spatial strategy. Brain and Language 1995;49:105-24.
23. Mandler J. Preverbal representation and language. In: Bloom P, Peterson MA, Nadel L, Garrett MF, editors. Language and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 365-84.
24. Mangun GR, Hillyard SA. Spatial gradients of visual attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. EEG and Clinical Neurophysiology 1988;70:417-28.
25. Matsui T, Hirano A. An atlas of the human brain for computerized tomography. Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin, 1978.
26. McCarthy G, Nobre AC. Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention. EEG and Clinical Neurophysiology 1993;88:210-9.
27. McGurk H, Macdonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976;264:746-8.
28. Meador KJ, Watson RT, Bowers D, Heilman KM. Hypometria with hemispatial and limb motor neglect. Brain 1986;109:293-305.
29. Milner AD, Goodale MA. The visual brain in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995.
30. Morais J, Bertelson P. Laterality effects in dichotic listening. Perception 1973;2:107-11.
31. Morais J. The effects of ventriloquism on the right-side advantage for verbal material, Cognition 1974;3:127-39.
32. Morais J, Cary L, Vanhaelen H, Bertelson P. Postural determinants of frontal-position advantage in listening to speech. Perception and Psychophysics 1980;27:141-8.
33. Nadeau SE, Heilman KM. Gaze-dependent hemianopia without hemispatial neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, in press.
34. Nicoletti R, Umilta C. Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychological Research 1994;56:144-50.
35. Paivio A, Yuille JC, Madigan SA. Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968;76(suppl):1-25.
36. Pierson JM, Bradshaw JL, Meyer TF, Howard MJ, Bradshaw JA. Direction of gaze during vibrotactile choice reaction time tasks. Neuropsychologia 1991;29:925-8.
37. Pinker S. Learnability and Cognition. The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.
38. Posner MI, Dehaene S. Attentional networks. Trends in Neuroscience 1994;17:75-9.
39. Proctor RW, Reeve TG. Stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990.
40. Simon JR. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969;81:174-6.
41. Smania N, Aglioti S. Sensory and spatial components of someaesthetic deficits following right brain damage. Neurology 1996;45:1725-30.
42. Soroker N, Calamaro N, Myslobodsky MS. Ventriloquist effect reinstates responsiveness to auditory stimuli in the 'ignored' space in patients with hemispatial neglect. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1995;17:243-55.
43. Spence CJ, Driver J. Covert spatial orienting in audition: exogenous and endogenous mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994;20:555-74.
44. Stark M, Coslett HB, Saffran EM. Impairment of an egocentric map of locations: implications for perception and action. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1996;13:481-523.
45. Stein JF. The representation of egocentric space in the parietal lobe. Behavioral and Brain Science 1992;15:691-700.
46. Stoffer TH, Yakin AR. The functional role of attention for spatial coding in the Simon effect. Psychological Research 1994;56:151-62.
47. Styles EA, Allport DA. Perceptual integration of identity, location and color. Psychological Research 1986;48:189-200.
48. Umiltá C, Nicoletti R. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In: Proctor RW, Reeve TG, editors. Stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990:89-116.
49. Umiltá C, Nicoletti R. An integrated model of the Simon effect. In: Alegria, Holender D, Junca de Morais J, Radeau M, editors. Analytic approaches to human cognition. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1992:331-50.
50. Umiltá C, Liotti M. Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility. Psychological Research 1987;49:81-90.
51. VanVoorhis S, Hillyard SA. Visual evoked potentials and selective attention to points in space. Perceptual Psychology 1977;22: 54-62.
52. Verfaellie M, Bowers D, Heilman KM. Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects. Neuropsychologia 1988;26:435-44
53. Verfaellie M, Bowers D, Heilman KM. Attentional processes in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In: Proctor RW, Reeve TG, editors. Stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990:261-78.
54. Wallace RJ. S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971;88:354-60.
55. Weeks DJ, Proctor, RW, Beyak, B. Stimulus-response compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: evidence for spatial coding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995;48:367-83.
56. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Behavioral Inattention Test. Titchfield: Thames Valley Test Company, 1987.