The role of envelope modulation in spectrally unresolved iterated rippled noise

Hearing Research

Volumn 132, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 94-108

  Wiegrebe, Lutz ^a   Patterson, Roy D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amplitude modulation; Complex tone; Random phase; Rippled noise; Temporal pitch; Unresolved harmonics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NOISE; NOISE REDUCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WAVEFORM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PERIODICITY; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0032979284     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00040-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Burns, E.M., Viemeister, N.F., 1976. Nonspectral pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60, 863-868.
2. Cariani, P.A., Delgutte, B., 1996a. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience. J. Neurophysiol. 76, 1698-1716.
3. Cariani, P.A., Delgutte, B., 1996b. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase-invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region of pitch. J. Neurophysiol. 76, 1717-1734.
4. Carlyon, R.P., 1994. Detecting pitch-pulse asynchronies and differences in fundamental frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 968-979.
5. Fastl, H., Stoll, G., 1979. Scaling of pitch strength. Hear. Res. 1, 293-301.
6. Hanna, T.E., Robinson, D.E., 1985. Phase effects for a sine wave masked by reproducible noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 1129-1140.
7. Houtsma, A.J.M., Smurzynski, J., 1990. Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 304-310.
8. Kaernbach, C., Demany, L., 1998. Psychophysical evidence against the autocorrelation theory of temporal processing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 2298-2306.
9. Kim, D.O., Leonard, G., 1988. Pitch-period following response of cat cochlear nucleus neurons to speech sounds. In: Duifhuis, H., Horst, J.W., Wit, H.P. (Eds.), Basic Issues in Hearing, Proceedings of the 8th international Symposium in Hearing. Academic Press, London, pp. 252-260.
10. Levitt, H., 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 467-477.
11. Meddis, R., O'Mard, L., 1997. A unitary model of pitch perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1811-1820.
12. Moore, B.C.J., 1977. Effects of relative phase of the components on the pitch of three-component complex tones. In: Evans, E.F., Wilson, J.P. (Eds.), Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, Academic Press, London.
13. Moore, B.C.J., 1997. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 4th edn. Academic Press, London.
14. Moore, B.C.J., Rosen, S.M., 1979. Tune recognition with reduced pitch and interval information. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 31, 229-240.
15. Patterson, R.D., Handel, S., Yost, W.A., Datta, A.J., 1996. The relative strength of the tone and noise components in iterated rippled noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 3286-3294.
16. Shackleton, T.M., Carlyon, R.C., 1994. The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3529-3540.
17. van Norden, L., 1982. Two-channel pitch perception. In: Clynes, M. (Ed.), Music, Mind and Brain. Plenum, New York.
18. Viemeister, N.F., 1977. Temporal factors in audition: A system approach. In: Evans, E.F., Wilson, J.P. (Eds.), Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing. Academic Press, New York.
19. Yost, W.A., 1996a. The pitch of iterated rippled noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 (1), 511-518.
20. Yost, W.A., 1996b. The pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 (5), 3329-3335.