Outcome research - A never ending story;La recherche sur les resultats des psychotherapies - Une histoire sans fin

Psychotherapies

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 35-52

  Kordy, Hans ^a   Kachele, Horst ^b  

^a Antenne de Recherche de Stuttgart   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Economic aspects; Inpatient psychotherapy; Methodological models; Outcome research; Process research; Simple case studies

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PSYCHIATRY; PSYCHOSOMATIC DISORDER; PSYCHOTHERAPY;

EID: 0032978870     PISSN: 0251737X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. ALEXANDER F. (1937): Five year report of the Chicago Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1932-1937. Chicago, Institute of Psychoanalysis.
2. ALEXANDER F. (1950): Médecine psychosomatique. Ses Principes et ses applications. Paris, Payot, 1952.
3. APA (1982): Psychotherapy Research. Methodological and Efficacy Issues. Washington, American Psychiatric Association.
4. APPELBAUM S. (1977): The Anatomy of Change. New York, Plenum.
5. BENJAMIN L.S. (1974): Structural analysis of social behavior. Psychol. Rev., 81: 392-425.
6. BERGIN A.E. (1971): The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes, pp. 217-270, in: Bergin A., Garfield S. (eds): Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. New York, Wiley.
7. BLIESENER T., KOHLE K. (1986): Die ärztliche Visite - Chance zum Gesprächh. Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.
8. BOOR C. de, KUNZLER E. (1963): Die psychosomatische Klinik und ihre Patienten. Stuttgart, Klett.
9. BRAUTIGAM W., ENGEL K., KORDY H., RAD M.V., SCHEIBLER D., ZITZELSBERGER, A. (1980): Research on outcome of psychotherapy -considered from a psychoanalytic viewpoint, in: Moor W. de, Wijngaarden N. (eds): Psychotherapy: Research and Training. Elsevier, North Holland Biomed Press, 115-119.
10. COLSON D.B., COYNE L, POLLACK W.S. (1988): Scales to assess the emphasis of psychiatric hospital treatment. Psychiatry, 51: 281-290.
11. COST (1991): European Co-Operation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research (COST): Draft memorandum of understanding for the implementation of an European research project on complementary medicin (329).
12. DAHL A., KACHELE A., THOMA, H. (eds) (1988): Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/London/ Paris/Tokyo, Springer.
13. DUHRSSEN A.M. (1962): Katamnestische Ergebnisse bei 1004 Patienten nach analytische Psychotherapie. Z. Psychosom. Med., 8: 94-113.
14. DUHRSSEN A.M., JORSWIECK E. (1965): Eine empirisch-statistische Untersuchung zur Leistungsfahigkeit psychoanalytischer Behandlung. Nervenarzt, 36: 166-169.
15. EGLE T., HEUCHER K., HOFFMANN S., PROSCH U. (1992): Psychoanalytisch-orientierte Gruppentherapie mit psychogenen Schmerzpatienten. Ein Beitrag zur Behandlungsmethodik. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol., 42: 79-90.
16. ELKIN I. (1994): The NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program: Where we began and where we are, pp. 114-139 in: Bergin A.E., Garfield S.L.: Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. New York, Wiley.
17. ELKIN I. et al. (1989): National Institute of Mental Health treatment of depression collaborative research program: General effectiveness of treatments. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 46: 971-983.
18. EYSENCK, H. (1952): The effects of psychotherapy: an evaluation. J. Consult. Psychol., 16: 319-324.
19. EYSENCK, H. (1966): The Effects of Psychotherapy. New York, International Science Press.
20. EYSENCK H (1978): An exercise in mega-silliness. Amer. Psychol., 33: 517.
21. FEIEREIS H. (resp.) (1990): Wirksamkeit psychotherapeutischer Massnahmen bei Morbus Crohn - eine multizentrisch Studie, pp. 94-96 in: Projekttrager Forschung im Dienste der Gesundheit (Hrsg.): Klinische Studien in der Psychiatrie - Therapie und Rückfallprophylaxe psychischer Erkrankungen im Erwachsenenalter. Bremerhaven, Wirtschaftsverlag.
22. FENICHEL O. (1930): Statistischer Bericht über die tehrapeutische Tätigkeit 1920-1930, pp. 13-19 in: Rado S., Fenichel O., Muller-Braunschweig C. (Hrsg.): Zehn Jahre Berliner Psychoanalytisches Institut Poliklinik und Lehranstalt. Wien, Internat. Psychoanal. Verlag.
23. FISKE D. (1983): The meta-analytic revolution of outcome research. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol., 51: 65-70.
24. GALLO P. (1978): Meta-analysis - a missed metaphor? Amer. Psychol., 33: 515-517.
25. GLASS G., KLIEGL R. (1983): An apology for research integration in the study of psychotherapy. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol., 51: 28-41.
26. GOFFMAN E. (1961): Asiles. Etudes sur les conditions sociales des malades mentaux. Paris, Minuit, 1968.
27. GRAWE K. (1988): Zurück zur psychotherapeutischen Eizelfallforschung. Z. Klin. Psychol., 17: 4-5.
28. GRAWE K. (1992): Psychotherapieforschung zu Beginn der neunziger Jahre. Psychol. Rundschau, 43: 132-162.
29. GRAWE K., BERNAUER F., DONATI R. (1990): Psychotherapien im Vergleich. Haben wirklich alle einen Preis verdient? Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol., 40: 102-114.
30. GRAWE K., CASPAR F., AMBÜHL A. (1990): Differentielle Psychotherapieforschung: Vier Therapieformen im Vergleich. Z. Klin. Psychol., 19: 292-376.
31. GRAWE K., Donati R., Bernauer F. (1993): Psychotherapie im Wandel: Von der Konfession zur Profession. Göttingen, Hogrefe.
32. GRAWE K., SIEGFRIED J., BERNAUER F., DONATI R. (1988): Qualitätsanalyse der Psychotherapieforschung. Schweiz. Z. Psychol., 46: 259-266.
33. GREENBERG L. (1991): Research on the process of change. Psychother. Res., 1: 3-16.
34. GREENBERG L., Pinsof W. (eds) (1986): The Psychotherapeutic Process: A Research Handbook. New York, Guilford.
35. HEIMANN H., ZIMMER F. (Hrsg.) (1987): Chronisch psychisch Kranke. Stuttgart/New York, Fischer.
36. HOROWITZ L., ROSENBERG S., BAER A., URENO G., VILLASENOR V. (1988): Inventory of interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol., 56: 885-892.
37. HOROWITZ L., ROSENBERC S., KALEHZAN B. (1992): The capacity to describe other people clearly: a predictor of interpersonalproblems and outcome in brief dynamic psychotherapy. Psychother. Res., 2: 37-51.
38. HOROWITZ M. (1991): Person Schemas and Maladaptive Interpersonal Behavior. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
39. HOWARD K.I., KOPTA S.M., KRAUSE M.S., ORLINSKY D.E. (1986): The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. Amer. Psychologist, 4: 159-164.
40. HOWARD K.I., LUEGER R.J., MALING M.S., MARTINOVICH Z. (1992): A phase model of psychotherapy: Causal mediation of outcome. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 61: 678-685.
41. HOWARD K.I., LUEGER R.J., O'MAHONEY M.T.O (1991): The Howard Outpatient Tracking System. Philadelphia, Integra.
42. HOWARD K.U., LUEGER R.J., SCHANK D. (1992): The psychotherapy service delivery system. Psychother. Res., 2: 164-180.
43. JACOBSON N.S., Truax P. (1991): Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol., 59: 12-19.
44. KÄCHELE H. (1981): Zur Bedeutung der Krankengeschichte un der klinisch-psychoanalytischen Forschung. Jahrbuch der Psychoanalyse, 12: 118.
45. KACHELE H. (1990a): Une nouvelle perspective de recherche en psychothérapie - le projet PEP. Psychothérapies, 12: 73-77, 1992.
46. KACHELE H. (1990b): Wie lange dauert Psychotherapie. Psychother. Med. Psychol., 40: 148-151.
47. KÄCHELE H., KORDY H. (1992): Psychotherapieforschung und therapeutische Versorgung. Nervenarzt, 66: 517-526.
48. KÄCHELE H., SCHEYTT N. (1990): Sprechen und Spielen _verbale und non-verbale Aspekte des musiktherapeutischen Prozesses. Musikther. Umschau, 11: 286-295.
49. KISH J., KROLL J. (1980): Meaningfulness versus effectiveness: paradoxical implications in the evaluation of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 17: 401-413.
50. KERNBERG O.F., BURSTEINE E.D., COYNE L., APPELBAUM A., HOROWITZ L., VOTH H. (1972): Psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. Final Report of the Menninger Foundation. Bull. Menninger Clin., 36: 3-276.
51. KÖHLE K., RASPE H.H. (Hrsg.) (1982): Das Gespräch während der Visite. München/Wien/Baltimore, Urban & Schwarzenberg.
52. KÖHLE K., SIMONS C., BOCK D., GRAUHAN A. (1980): Angewandte Psychosomatik. Die internistisch-psychosomatische Krankenstation. Eine Werkstattbericht. 2.Auflage. Basel, Rocom.
53. KORCHIN S.J. (1983): Nonspecific factors in psychotherapy, pp. 1-13 in: Minsel W.R., Herff W. (eds): Methodology in Psychotherapy Research, vol. 1. Frankfurt, Peter Lang.
54. KORDY L.H. (1992): Qualitätssicherung: Erläuterungen zu einem Reiz- und Modewort. Z. Psychosom. Med., 38: 310-324.
55. KORDY H., NORMANN D. (1992): Psychologische und somatische Faktoren, die den Verlauf der Crohn'schen Krankheit beeinflussen. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol., 42: 141-149.
56. KORDY H., RAD M. von, SENF W. (1983): Success and failure in psychotherapy: hypotheses and results from the Heidelberg follow-up project. Psychother. Psychosom., 40: 211-227.
57. KORDY H., RAD M. von, SENF W. (1989): Empirical hypotheses on the psychotherapeutic treatment of psychosomatic patients in short- and long-term unlimited psychotherapy. Psychother. Psychosom., 52: 155-163.
58. KORDY H., RAD M. von, SENF W. (1990): Therapeutische Faktoren bei stationärer Psychotherapie - Die Sicht der Patienten. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol., 40: 380-387.
59. KORDY H., SCHEIBLER D. (1984): Individuumsorientierte Erfolgsforschung: Erfassung und Bewertung von Therapieeffekten anhand individuellerBehandlungsziele. Z. Klin. Psychol. Psychopath. Psychother, 32: 218-233.
60. KORDY H., SENF W. (1985): Ueberlegungen zur Evaluation psychotherapeutischer Behandlungen. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol., 35: 207-212.
61. LAMBERT M.J., CHRISTENSEN E.R., DEJULIO S.S. (1983): The Assessment of Psychotherapy Outcome. New York, Wiley.
62. LANDMAN J.T., DAWES R.M. (1982): Psychotherapy outcome: Smith amd Glass' conclusions stand up under scrutinity. Amer. Psychologist, 37: 504-516.
63. LEUZINGER-BOHLEBER M., KACHELE H. (1988): From Calvin to Freud: Using an artificial intelligence model to investigate cognitive changes during psychoanalysis, pp. 291-306 in: Dahl H., Kächele H., Thomä H. (eds): Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies. Berlin/Heidelberg/NewYork/London/Paris/ Tokyo, Springer.
64. LUBORSKY L. (1976): Helping alliance in psychotherpay: the groundwork for a study of their relationship to its outcome, pp. 92-116 in: Claghorn J.L. (ed.): Successful Psychotherapy. New York, Brunner & Mazel.
65. LUBORSKY L., CRITS-CHRISTOPH P., MINTZ J., AUERBACH A. (1988): Who Will Benefit from Psychotherapy? New York, Basic Books.
66. LUBORSKY L., SINGER B., LUBORSKY L. (1985): Comparative studies of psychotherapy: is it true that «Everybody has won and all must have prizes» ? Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 32: 995-1008.
67. MCNEILLY C., HOWARD K.I. (1991): The effects of psychotherapy: a reevaluation based on dosage. Psychother. Res., 1: 74-78.
68. MELTZOFF J., KORNREICH M. (1970): Research in Psychotherapy. New York, Atherton.
69. MEYER A.E. (ed.) (1981): The Hamburg short psychotherapy comparison experiment. Psychother. Psychosom., 35: 77-207.
70. MEYER A.E., RICHTER R., GRAWE K, SCHULENBURG J.G. v., SCHULTE B. (1991): Forschungsgutachten zu Fragen eines Psychotherapeutengesetzes. Eppendorf, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Hamburg.
71. NEWMAN F.L. (1983): Therapist's evaluation of psychotherapy, pp. 498-536 in: Lambert M.J., Christensen E.R., DeJulio S.S. (1983): The Assessment of Psychotherapy Outcome. New York, Wiley.
72. NEWMAN F.L., HOWARD K.I. (1986): Therapeutic effort, treatment outcome, and national health policy. Amer. Psychologist, 41: 181-187.
73. NEWMAN F.L., SORENSEN J. (1985): Integrated Clinical and Fiscal Managmentin Mental Health. A Guidebook. Norwood, Ablex.
74. NORMANN D., KORDY H. (1991): Coping bei Morbus Crohn-Patienten unter differentieller Perspektive: Ein Beitrag zur Spicificitätsdiskussion. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol., 41: 11-21.
75. ORLINSKY D.E., HOWARD K.I. (1986): Process and outcome in psychotherapy, pp. 311-383 in: Garfield S.L., Bergin A.E. (eds): Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavioral Change. New York, Wiley.
76. PARLOFF M.B. (1968): Analytic group psychotherapy, pp. 492-531 in: Marmor J. (ed.): Modern Psychoanalysis. New York, Basic Books.
77. PARLOFF M.B. (1979): Can psychotherapy research guide the policymaker? A little knowledge may be a dangerous thing. Amer. Psychol., 34: 296-306.
78. PARLOFF M. (1983): Contributions and limits of psychotherapy research, pp. 30-45 in: Minsel W.R., Herff W. (eds): Methodology in Psychotherapy Research, vol. 1. Frankfurt, Peter Lang.
79. RAD M. von, SENF W. (1986): Ergebnisforschung in der psychosomatischen Medizin, pp. 361-378 in: Uexküll T. von (Hrsg.):Psychosomatische Medizin. München/Wien/Baltimore, Urban & Schwarzenberg.
80. ROSENBERG S., SILBERSCHATZ G., CURTIS T., SAMPSON H., WEISS J. (1986): A method for establishing reliability of statements from psychodynamic case formulation. Amer. J. Psychiat., 143: 1454-1456.
81. SARGENT H.D., HOTWITZ L., WALLERSTEIN R.S., APPELBAUM A. (1968): Prediction in Psychotherapy Research. A Method for the Transformation of Clinical Judgements into Testable Hypotheses. New York, International University Press (Psychological Issues, Monograph 21).
82. SAUNDERS S.M., HOWARD K.I., NEWMAN F.L (1988): Evaluating the clinical significance of treatment effects: norms and normality. Behavior. Assess., 10: 207-218.
83. SCHEPANK H. et TRESS L.W. (1988): Die stationäre Psychotherapie und ihre Rahmen. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, Springer.
84. SCHLESINGER H., MUMFORD E., GLASS G. (1980): Mental health services and medical utilization, pp. 71-102 in: Vandenbos G. (ed.): Psychotherapy: Practice, Research, Policy. Beverly Hills, Sage.
85. SEARLES H.F. (1960): The Nonhuman Environment. New York, International University Press.
86. SENF W., KORDY H., RAD M. von, BRAUTIGAM W. (1984): Indication on psychotherapy on the basis of a follow-up project. Psychother. Psychosom., 42: 37-47.
87. SLOANE E.R.B., STAPLES, F.R., CRISTOL A.H., AORKSTON N.J., WHIPPLE K. (1975): Psychotherapy Versus Behavior Therapy. Cambridge, Harvard Université Press.
88. SMITH M.L., GLASS G.V., MILLER T.L. (1980): The Benefits of Psychotherapy. Baltimore/London, Johns Hopkins University Press.
89. SPEER D.C. (1992): Clinically significant change: Jacobson and Truax (1991) revisited. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol., 60: 402-408.
90. STILES W.B., SHAPIRO D.A. (1989): Abuse of the drug metaphor in psychotherapy process-outcome research. Clin. Psychol. Rev., 9: 521-543.
91. STILES W.B., SHAPIRO D.A., ELLIOT R. (1986): Are all psychotherapies equivalent? Amer Psychol., 41: 165-180.
92. STRUPP H.H. (1980): Success and failure in time-limited psychotherapy: a systematic comparison of two cases (Comparison I-IV). Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 37: 595-603, 708-716, 831-841, 947-954.
93. STRUPP H.H., BINDER J. (1984): Psychotherapy as a New Key. A Guide to Time-Limited Dynamic Psychotherapy. New York, Basic Books.
94. STRUPP H.H., HADLEY S.W. (1977): A tripartite model of mental health and therapeutic outcome. Amer. Psychol, 32: 187-195.
95. STRUPP H.H., HADLEY S.W., Gomez-Schwartz B. (1977): Psychotherapy tot Better or Worse. An Analysis of the Problem of Negative Effects. New York, Aronson.
96. STRUPP H.H., HOWARD K.I. (1992): A brief history of psychotherapy research, pp 309-334 in: Freedheim D. (ed.): A History of Psychotherapy. Washington, American Psychological Association.
97. The ALMACAN (1989): McDonnell Douglas Corporation's EAP produces hard data, p. 18.
98. TICHO E. (1971): Termination of psychoanalysis: Treatment goals, life goals. Psychoanal. Quart., 41: 315.
99. VESSEY J.T., HOWARD K.I., LUEGER R.J., KACHELE H., MERGENTHALER E. (1994): The clinician's illusion and the psychotherapy practice: an application of stochastic modelling. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol., 62: 679-685.
100. VOTH H.M., ORTH M.H. (1973): Psychotherapy and the Role of the Environment. New York, Behavior Publ.
101. WALLERSTEIN R.S. (1986): Forty-Two Lives in Treatment. A Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. New York, Guilford.
102. WALLERSTEIN R.S. (1989): The psychotherapy research project of the Menninger Foundation: an overview. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol., 57: 195-205.
103. WEBER J.J., BACHRACH H.M., SOLOMON M. (1985): Factors associated with the outcome of psychoanalysis. Report of the Colombia Psychoanalytic Center Research Project (II). Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 12: 127-141.
104. WITTMANN W.W. (1985): Evaluatiopnsforschung: Aufgaben, Probleme und Anwendungen. Heidelberg/New York, Springer.
105. WITTMANN W.W., MATT G.E. (1986): Meta-Analyse als Integration von Forschungsergebnissen am Beispiel deutsprachiger Arbeiten zur Effektivität von Psychotherapie. Psychol. Rundschau, 37: 20-40.
106. YATES B.T., NEWMANN F.L. (1980a): Approaches to cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-benefit analysis of psychotherapy, 103-162 in: Vandenbos G. (ed.): Psychotherapy: Practice, Research, Policy. Beverly-Hills, Sage.
107. YATES B.T., NEWMANN F.L. (1980b): Findings of cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of psychotherapy, pp. 163-186 in: Vandenbos G. (ed.): Psychotherapy: Practice, Research, Policy. Beverly-Hills, Sage.