The use of an independent visual background to reduce simulator side- effects

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 70, Issue 3 I, 1999, Pages 277-283

  Prothero, Jerrold D ^a   Draper, Mark H ^a   Furness III, Thomas A ^a   Parker, Donald E ^a   Wells, Maxwell J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Ataxia; Computer graphics; Motion sickness; Rest frame; Simulation; Simulator sickness; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATAXIA; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MOTION SICKNESS; NORMAL HUMAN; REDUCTION; SIMULATOR; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

NASA DISCIPLINE NEUROSCIENCE; NON-NASA CENTER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATAXIA; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION SICKNESS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

ATAXIA;

EID: 0032977372     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brandt T, Dichgans J, Koenig E. Foreground and background in dynamic spatial orientation. Perc Psych 1975; 17:497-503.
2. Dichgans J, Brandt T. Visual vestibular interaction: effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In: Held R, Lei-bowitz W, eds. Handbook of sensory physiology, vol. 8. New York: Springer-Verlag. 1978.
3. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1988.
4. Griffin MJ. Handbook of human vibration. London: Academic Press. 1990.
5. Griffin MJ. Physical characteristics of stimuli provoking motion sickness. AGARD Lecture Series. Motion sickness: significance in aerospace operations and prophylaxis. Neuilly sur Seine: AGARD. AGARD-LS-1991.
6. Hamilton KM, Kanto L, Magee LE. Limitations of postural equilibrium tests for examining simulator sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 1989; 60:246-51.
7. Howard IP. The perception of posture, self motion, and the visual vertical. In: Boff KP, Kaufman L, Thomas JP, eds. Handbook of perception and human performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1986.
8. Kennedy RS, Drexler JM, Berbaum KS. Methodological and measurement issues for identification of engineering features contributing to virtual reality sickness. IMAGE VII 1994; 245-54.
9. Kennedy RS, Hettinger LJ, Lilienthal, MG. Simulator sickness. In: Crampton GH, ed. Motion and space sickness. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 1990.
10. Kennedy RS, Lane NE, Berbaum KS, Lilienthal MG. Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol 1993; 3(3):203-20.
11. Kolasinski EM. Simulator sickness in virtual environments. Alexandria, VA: United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1995; TR1027.
12. Levine MW, Shefner JM. Fundamentals of sensation and perception. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing. 1991.
13. Ohmi M, Howard IP. Effect of stationary objects on illusory forward self-motion induced by a looming display. Perception 1988; 17(1):5-12.
14. Ohmi M, Howard IP, Landolt JP. Circular vection as a function of foreground-background relationships. Perception 1987; 16(1): 17-22.
15. Presence. (Special issue on simulator sickness.) 1992; 1:295-363.
16. th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society. 1995.
17. Reason JT. Motion sickness: a special case of sensory rearrangement. Adv Sci 1970; 386-93.
18. Reason JT. Motion sickness adaptation: a neural mismatch model. J R Soc Med 1978; 71:819-29.
19. Wallach H. The perception of motion. Sci Am 1959; 201:55-60.