Postacute predictors of functional and cognitive progress in traumatic brain injury: Somatosensory evoked potentials

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 252-257

  Özbudak Demir, Sibel ^a,c   Akyüz, Müfit ^a   Güler Uysal, Füsun ^b   Orkun, Sevim ^a  

^a Ankara Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^b CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MALE; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 0032976991     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90134-X     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Boake C, High WM Jr. Functional outcome from traumatic brain injury: unidimensional or multidimensional? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75:105-13.
2. Barelli A, Valenta MA, Clemente A, Bozza P, Proietti R, Conte FD. Serial multimodality evoked potentials in severely head-injured patients: diagnostic and prognostic implications. Crit Care Med 1991;19:1374-81.
3. Newlon PG, Greenberg RP, Hyatt MS, Enas GG, Becker DP. The dynamics of neuronal dysfunction and recovery following severe head injury assessed with serial multimodality evoked potentials. J Neurosurg 1982;57:168-77.
4. Anderson DC, Bundlie S, Rockwold GL. Multimodality evoked potentials in closed head trauma. Arch Neurol 1984;41:369-74.
5. Cole JL, Peone WS. Central nervous system electrophysiology. In: Delisa JA, Gans MB, editors. Rehabilitation medicine. Philadelphia (PA): J.B. Lippincott; 1993. p. 308-35.
6. Eisen A. The somatosensory evoked potentials recording techniques and applications. In: Goodgold J, editor. Rehabilitation medicine. St Louis (MO): C.V. Mosby; 1988. p. 26-44.
7. Hutchinson D, Fright RW, Shaw NA, Judson JA, Cant BR. A comparison between electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials for outcomes prediction following severe head injury. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991;78:228-33.
8. Greenberg RP, Newlon PG, Becker DP. Somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with severe head injury: outcome prediction and monitoring brain function. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1982;388:683-5.
9. Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:576-9.
10. Bruce BG, Robert S. Evaluation. In: Goodgold J, editors. Rehabilitation medicine. St Louis (MO): C.V. Mosby; 1988. p. 119-34.
11. Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, Belleza T, Cope DN. Disability Rating Scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:118-23.
12. Hall KM, Johnson MV. Outcomes evaluation in TBI rehabilitation, part II: measurement toll for a nationwide data system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:SC10-8.
13. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PP. "Mini Mental State." A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-98.
14. Kaplan P, Lal S. Rehabilitation of patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury. In: Goodgold J, editor. Rehabilitation medicine. St Louis (MO): C.V. Mosby; 1988. p. 119-43.
15. Cant BR, Hume AL, Judson JA, Shaw NA. The assessment of severe head injury by short-latency somatosensory and brain stem auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986;65:188-95.
16. Newlon PG, Greenberg RP. Evoked potentials in severe head injury. J Trauma 1984;24:61-6.
17. Greenberg RP, Becher DP, Miller DJ, Mayer DJ. Evaluation of brain function in severe human head trauma with multimodality evoked potentials, part II. Neurosurgery 1977;47:163-77.
18. Greenberg RP, Newlon PG, Hyatt MS, Norayan RK, Becker DP. Prognostic implications of early multimodality evoked potentials in severely head-injured patients. J Neurosurg 1981;55:227-36.
19. Shin DY, Ehremberg B, Whyte J, Bach J, Delisa JA. Evoked potentials assessment utility in prognosis of chronic head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:189-93.
20. Rappaport M, Hall K, Hopkins K, Belleza T, Berrol S, Reynolds G. Evoked potentials and disability in brain damaged patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1977;58:333-8.
21. Rappaport M, Hemmerle AV, Rappaport ML. Intermediate and long latency SEPs in relation to clinical disability in traumatic brain injury patients. Clin Electroencephalogr 1990;21:188-91.
22. Uysal FG, Kutsal YG, Öktem F, Başgöze O. Predictive factors in stroke outcome: somatosensory evoked potentials and cognitive functions. Eur J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;4:38-42.
23. Jabbari B, Vance SC, Harper MG, Salazor AM, Smutok MA, Amin D. Clinical and radiological correlates of somatosensory evoked potentials in late phase of head injury: a study of 500 Vietnam veterans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987;67:289-97.
24. Drake ME. Value and limitations of evoked potentials in head injury. Clin Electroencephalogr 1994;25:46-7.
25. Rappaport M, Hopkins HK, Hall KM, Belleza T. Evoked potentials and head injury: 2. Clinical applications. Clin Electroencephalogr 1981;12:167-76.
26. Rappaport M. Electrophysiologic assessment. In: Horn LJ, Zasler ND, editors. Medical rehabilitation of traumatic brain injury. Philadelphia (PA): Hanley and Belfus, Inc; 1996. p. 271-316.
27. Ruijs MB, Keyser A, Gabreels M, Notermans H. Somatosensory evoked potentials and cognitive sequalae in children with closed head-injury. Neuropediatrics 1993;24:307-12.
28. Olbrich HM, Nau HE, Lodemann E, Zerbin D, Eng M, SchmitNeuerburg KP. Evoked potential assessment of mental function during recovery from severe head injury. Surg Neurol 1986;26:112-18.
29. Johnston MV, Hall K, Carnevale G, Boake C. Functional assessment and outcome evaluation in traumatic brain injury. In: Horn LJ, Zasler ND, editors. Medical rehabilitation of traumatic brain injury. Philadelphia (PA): Hanley and Belfus, Inc; 1996. p. 197-226.
30. Freeman MR, Ryan JJ, Lopez SJ, Mittenberg W. Cognitive estimation in traumatic brain injury: rela3tionship with measures of intelligence, memory, and affect. Int J Neurosci 1995;83:269-73.