EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit: Pitfalls and caveats

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 40-45

  Young, G Bryan ^a,b   Campbell, Vanessa C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Artifact; EEG; ICU (intensive care unit); Monitoring

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMA; DEVICE; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PARALYSIS; PATIENT MONITORING; QUALITY CONTROL; SEDATION; THALAMOCORTICAL TRACT;

EID: 0032974944     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199901000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bridgers SL, Ebersole JS. EEG outside the hairline: detection of epileptiform abnormalities. Neurology 1988;38:146-9.
2. Ebersole JS, Bridgers SL. Cassette EEG monitoring in the emergency room and intensive care unit. J Clin Neurophysiol 1987;4:213.
3. Ebersole JS, Bridgers SL. Cassette EEG monitoring in the emergency room and intensive care unit. In: Ebersole JS, ed. Ambulatory EEG monitoring. New York: Raven Press, 1989: 231-42.
4. Jasper HH. The ten-twenty system of the International Federation. Electorencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958;10:371-3.
5. Jordan KG. Continuous EEG and evoked potential monitoring in the neuroscience intensive care unit. J Clin Neurophysiol 1993;10: 445-75.
6. Nuwer MR, Comi G, Emerson R, et al. IFCN standards for the clinical recording of digital EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;106:259-61.
7. Swatz BE. The advantages of digital over analog recording techniques. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;106:113-17.