Trends in the UK contribution to the otolaryngological literature

Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 26-30

  Carney, A Simon ^a   Nunez, D A ^b   Nair, S B ^c   Hussain, S S M ^d  

^a LEICESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c North Riding Infirmary   (United Kingdom)

^d AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Authorship; Great Britain; Northern Ireland; Otolaryngology; Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; LABORATORY TEST; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

AUTHORSHIP; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; PERIODICALS; RESEARCH;

EID: 0032971786     PISSN: 03077772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1999.00184.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 1 BAILEY B.J. (1982) The development of research programs in otolaryngology. Arch. Otolaryngol. 108, 635-638
2. 2 ANONYMOUS (1991) Bearing of basic research on clinical otolaryngology: meeting of the Collegium Oto-Rhino-Laryngologicum Amicitiae Sacrum, Basel August 19-22, 1990. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol. 46, 1-182
3. 3 SMITH R. (1987) All change for research. BMJ. 295, 1177-1182
4. 4 BOOTH C. (1986) Better a commitment to health and research than to missiles. BMJ. 293, 23-26
5. 5 DEAN M. (1996) British medical academic work faces 'triple whammy'. Lancet 347, 1685
6. 6 SCRETARY OF STAFF FOR HEALTH (1996) The National Health Service. A Service with Ambitions. HMSO, London
7. 7 CALMAN K. (1993) Hospital Doctors: Training for the Future. The Report of the Working Group on Specialist Medical Training. Health Publications, London
8. 8 RICHMOND M. (1991) A future for British science. Nature 353, 379-382
9. 9 ROSENFELD R.M. (1991) Clinical research in otolaryngology journals. Arch. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 117, 164-170
10. 10 MARAN A.G.D., MOLONY N.C., ARMSTRONG M.W. et al. (1997) Is there an evidence hase for the practice of ENT surgery? Clin. Otolaryngol. 22, 152-157
11. 11 WELLER A.C. (1996) A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of US medical journals. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 84, 359-366
12. 12 WELLER A.C. (1987) Editorial policy and the assessment of quality among medical journals. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 75, 310-316
13. 13 HARGENS L.L. (1990) Variation in journal peer review systems. Possible causes and consequences. JAMA 263, 1348-1352
14. 14 CARNIE L. & KUMAR B. (1984) An analysis of thirty years of contributions to the British anaesthetic literature (1953 82). Br. J. Anaesth. 56, 1171-1174
15. 15 BAILEY B.J. (1983) National organization for inter-institutional co-operative studies in otolaryngology. Arch. Otolaryngol. 109, 329-332
16. 16 BHOPAL R., RANKIN L., MCCOLL E. et al. (1997) The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ 314, 1009-1012
17. 17 ANONYMOUS (1997) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: International Committee of Medical Journal editors. JAMA 277, 927-934
18. 18 ANONYMOUS (1982) First National Conference on Research Goals and Methods in Otolaryngology: recommendations of the writing groups. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 100 (Suppl.), 1-24
19. 19 WATSON C. (1991) Senior registrar training in otolaryngology: an audit of trainees. Clin. Otolaryngol. 16, 551-553
20. 20 GATES G.A. (1981) Research in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Arch. Ototaryngol. 107, 526-527
21. 21 SNOW L.B. JR (1996) Evolution of research otolaryngology-head and neck surgery over the past century. Laryngoscope 106, 529-531
22. 22 FLETCHER R.H. & FLETCHER S.M. (1979) Clinical research in general medical journals: a 30-year perspective. N. Engl. J. Med. 301, 180-183