Different laboratory/work climates: Impacts on women in the workplace

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 869, Issue , 1999, Pages 95-101

  Rosser, Sue V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAREER; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; LABORATORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICS; WORKPLACE;

EID: 0032967902     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08361.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Respondent #24 to POWRE survey.
2. TRAWEEK, S. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physics. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.
3. LATOUR, B. & S. WOOLGAR. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage Publications. Beverly Hills, CA.
4. LATOUR, B. 1987. Science in Action. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.
5. ROSSER, S. V. 1990. Female Friendly Science. Pergamon Press. Elmsford, NY.
6. ROSSER, S. V. 1995. Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering. Teachers College Press. New York.
7. ROSSER, S. V. 1997. Re-engineering Female Friendly Science. Teachers College Press. New York.
8. BARAD, K. 1995. A feminist approach to teaching quantum physics. In Teaching the Majority. S. V. Rosser, Ed.: 43-75. Teachers College Press. New York.
9. RICHARDSON, D., C. SUTTON & K. CERCONE. 1995. Female-friendly geoscience: Eight techniques for reaching the majority. In Teaching the Majority. S. V. Rosser, Ed.: 183-192. Teachers College Press. New York.
10. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. 1990. Science for All Americans. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Washington, DC.
11. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford University Press. New York.
12. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN. 1992. How schools shortchange girls. AAUW Educational Foundation. Washington, DC.
13. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. 1996. National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press. Washington, DC.
14. TOBIAS, SHEILA. 1990. They're Not Dumb, They're Different. Research Corporation. Tucson, AZ.
15. TOBIAS, SHEILA. 1992. Revitalizing Undergraduate Science Education: Why Some Things Work and Most Don't. Research Corporation. Tucson, AZ.
16. PROJECT KALEIDOSCOPE. 1994. Project Kaleidoscope Phase II: What Works: Focusing on the Future. Independent Colleges Office. Washington, DC.
17. KELLER, E. F. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. Yale University Press. New Haven, CT.
18. BOHONAK, N. 1995. Attracting and retaining women in graduate programs in computer science. In Teaching the Majority. S. V. Rosser, Ed.: 169-180. Teachers College Press. New York.
19. EASTMAN, C. 1995. Accommodating diversity in computer science education. In Teaching the Majority. S. V. Rosser, Ed.: 160-168. Teachers College Press. New York.
20. NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. 1994. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 1994. (NSF 94-333). National Science Foundation. Washington, DC.
21. NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. 1997. Professional Opportunities for Women in Research and Education POWRE Program Announcement. (NSF 97-91). National Science Foundation. Washington, DC.
22. SCHUSTER, M. & S. VAN DYNE. 1984. Placing women in the liberal arts: Stages of curriculum transformation. Harv. Educ. Rev. 54(4): 413-428.
23. MCINTOSH, P. 1984. The study of women: Processes of personal and curricular revision. Forum Liberal Educ. 6(5): 2-4.
24. TETREAULT, M. K. 1985. Stages of thinking about women: An experience-derived evaluation model. J. Higher Educ. 5: 368-384.