Using statistical power to optimize sensitivity of analysis of variance designs for microcosms and mesocosms

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 113-117

  Kennedy, James H ^a   Ammann, Larry P ^b   Waller, William T ^a   Warren, James E ^c   Hosmer, Alan J ^c   Cairns, Stefan H ^a   Johnson, Philip C ^d   Graney, Robert L ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^c Syngenta Crop Protection Inc   (United States)

^d U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

^e BAYER CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Design; Mesocosm; Microcosm; Power; Statistical

Indexed keywords

MESOCOSM; MICROCOSM; POLLUTION EFFECT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VARIANCE;

EID: 0032965083     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/1551-5028(1999)018<0113:USPTOS>2.3.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. Washington, DC.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1988. 40 CFR Parts 152, 153, 156, 158, and 162 Pesticide Registration Procedure, Pesticide Data Requirement. Final Rule. Fed Reg 53:15652-15990.
3. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 1991. Guidance document on testing procedures for pesticide in freshwater mesocosms: Meeting of experts on guidelines for static field mesocosm tests. Workshop Report. Huntingdon, UK, July 3-4, SETAC-Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
4. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 1992. Workshop on aquatic microcosms for ecological assessment of pesticides, Wintergreen, VA, USA, October 6-11, 1991. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, USA.
5. Baker JL, et al., eds. 1994. Aquatic dialogue group: Risk assessment and mitigation. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, FL, USA.
6. Crossland NO, Heimbach F, Hill IR, Boubou A, Leeuwangh P, Matthiessen P, Personne G. 1992. Summary and recommendation of the European Workshop on Freshwater Field Tests (EWOFFT). In Hill IR, Heimbach F, Leeuwangh P, Matthiessen P, eds, Freshwater Field Tests for Hazard Assessment of Chemicals. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp xxv-xxxvii.
7. Kennedy JH, Johnson PC, Johnson Z. 1995. The use of surrogate aquatic ecosystems in ecotoxicological research. In Hoffman R, ed, Handbook of Ecotoxicology. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 117-162.
8. Kennedy JH, Johnson PC, Johnson Z. 1994. Sampling and analysis strategies for measuring biological effects in microcosms and mesocosms. In Hill IR, Heimbach F, Leeuwangh P, Matthiessen P, eds, Freshwater Field Tests for Hazard Assessment of Chemicals. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 159-181.
9. Liber K, Kaushik NK, Soloman KR, Carey JH. 1992. Experimental designs for aquatic mesocosm studies: Comparison of the "ANOVA" and "regression" design for assessing the impact of tetrachlorophenol on zooplankton populations in limnocorrals. Environ Toxicol Chem 11:61-77.
10. Johnson PC, Kennedy JH, Morris RG, Hambleton FE. 1994. Fate and effects of cyfluthrin (pyrethroid insecticide) in pond mesocosms and concrete microcosms. In Graney R, Kennedy JH, Rodgers JH, eds, Aquatic Mesocosm Studies in Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 337-372.
11. Voshell JR Jr, Layton RJ, Hiner SW. 1989. Field techniques for determining the effects of toxic substances on benthic macro invertebrates in rocky-bottomed streams. In Cowgirl U, Williams LR, eds, Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment. STP 1027. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp 134-155.