Direct pharmacological comparison of the muscarinic receptors mediating relaxation and contraction in the rabbit thoracic aorta

General Pharmacology

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 445-452

  Sawyer, Barry D ^a   Bymaster, Frank P ^a   Calligaro, David O ^a   Falcone, Julie ^a   Mitch, Charles H ^a   Ward, John S ^a   Whitesitt, Celia ^a   Shannon, Harlan E ^a  

^a ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbachol; Muscarinic M2 receptors; Muscarinic M3 receptors; Muscarinic receptor partial agonists; Pilocarpine; RS86; Thoracic aorta (rabbit)

Indexed keywords

2 ETHYL 8 METHYL 2,8 DIAZASPIRO[4.5]DECANE 1,3 DIONE; CARBACHOL; MUSCARINIC AGENT; MUSCARINIC M2 RECEPTOR; MUSCARINIC M3 RECEPTOR; MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR; PARTIAL AGONIST; PILOCARPINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; AORTA CONSTRICTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GUINEA PIG; MALE; MUSCLE RELAXATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; THORACIC AORTA;

ANIMALS; AORTA, THORACIC; CARBACHOL; ENDOTHELIUM, VASCULAR; MALE; MUSCARINIC AGONISTS; MUSCARINIC ANTAGONISTS; MUSCLE, SMOOTH, VASCULAR; RABBITS; RECEPTOR, MUSCARINIC M3; RECEPTORS, MUSCARINIC; VASOCONSTRICTION; VASODILATION;

EID: 0032963672     PISSN: 03063623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-3623(98)00215-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Angus J.A., Campbell G.R., Cocks T.M., Manderson J.A. Vasodilation of acetylcholine is endothelium dependent. a study by sonomicrometry in canine femoral artery in vivo J Physiol (Lond). 344:1983;209-222.
2. Arunlkshana O., Schild O. Some quantitative uses of drug antagonists. Br J Pharmac Chemother. 14:1959;58-98.
3. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem. 72:1976;248-254.
4. Choo L.K., Malta E., Mitchelson F. The affinity of some selective muscarinic receptor antagonists for the muscarinic receptor mediating endothelial-dependent relaxation of the rabbit and rat thoracic aorta. J Pharm Pharmac. 38:1986;843-845.
5. De Lean A., Munson P.J., Rodbard D. Simultaneous analysis of families of sigmoidal curves. application to bioassay, radioligand assay and physiological dose-response relationships Am J Physiol. 235:1978;E97-E102.
6. Eglen R.M., Whiting R. Determination of the muscarinic receptor subtype mediating vasodilation. Br J Pharmac. 84:1985;3-5. a.
7. Eglen R.M., Whiting R. Comparison of the activities of muscarinic agonists on rabbit aorta and guinea pig ileum. Br J Pharmac. 83:1985;386P. b.
8. Eglen R.M., Whiting R. Heterogeneity of vascular muscarinic receptors. J Auton Pharmac. 19:1990;233-245.
9. Eglen R.M., Reddy H., Watson N., Challis R.A.J. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in smooth muscle. Trends Pharmac Sci. 15:1994;114-119.
10. Furchgott R.F., Bursztyn P. Comparison of dissociation constants and of relative potencies of selected agonists acting on parasympathetic receptors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 144:1967;882-899.
11. Furchgott R.F., Cherry P.D. The muscarinic receptor of the vascular endothelium that subserves vasodilation. Trends Pharmac Sci. 5(suppl.):1984;45-48.
12. Furchgott R.F., Zawadski J.V. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature. 288:1980;373-376.
13. Hawcock A.B., Roberts F.F. Comparison of the activities of muscarinic agonists on rabbit thoracic aorta preparations. Br J Pharmac. 92:1987;722P.
14. Jaiswal N., Lambrecht G., Mutschler E., Tacke R., Malik K.U. Pharmacological characterization of the vascular muscarinic receptors mediating relaxation and contraction in rabbit aorta. J Pharmac Exp Ther. 258:1991;842-850.
15. Jelliffe R.W. Dilator and constrictor effects of acetylcholine on isolated rabbit aortic chains. J Pharmac Exp Ther. 135:1962;349-353.
16. Kenakin, T., 1993. Pharmacologic analysis of drug-receptor interaction. 2d ed. Raven Press, New York.
17. Nilvebrant L., Sparf B. Muscarinic receptor binding in the guinea pig urinary bladder. Acta Pharmac Toxicol. 52:1983;30-38.
18. Ringdahl B. Selectivity of partial agonists related to oxotremorine based on differences in muscarinic receptor reserve between the guinea pig ileum and urinary bladder. Mol Pharmac. 31:1987;351-356.
19. Shannon H.E., Sawyer B.D., Bemis K.G., Bymaster F.P., Health I., Mitch C.H., Ward J.S. Muscarinic M1 receptor agonist actions of muscarinic receptor agonists in rabbi vas deferens. Eur J Pharmac. 232:1993;47-57.
20. Sim M.K., Manjeet S. Endothelial muscarinic receptors in the rabbit aorta. Eur J Pharmac. 163:1989;399-404.
21. Tallarida R.J., Jacob L.S. Kinetics of drug-receptor interaction. interpreting dose-response data The dose-response relation in pharmacology. 1979;49-84 Springer-Verlag, New York.
22. Watson N., Eglen R.M. Muscarinic M3 receptors mediate contractions in rabbit endothelium-denuded aorta in vitro. J Auton Pharmac. 14:1994;283-293.
23. Waud D.R., Parker R.B. Pharmacological estimation of drug-receptor dissociation constants. Statistical evaluation. II. Competitive antagonists J Pharmac Exp Ther. 177:1971;13-24.
24. 3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate. Mol Pharmacol. 10:1974;861-867.