Semiautomated monolayer preparation of bronchial secretions using AutoCyte PREP

Acta Cytologica

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 47-57

  Motherby, Helma ^a   Nicklaus, Susanne ^a   Berg, Alexander ^a,b   Ohler, Sandra ^a   Ross, Bernd ^a,c   Sarbia, Mario ^a   Böcking, Alfred ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Wartig Inc   (Germany)

^c St Vinzenz Hospital   (Germany)

Author keywords

AutoCyte; Bronchi; Computer assisted diagnosis; Lung neoplasms; Mass screening

Indexed keywords

AMMONIUM THIOGLYCOLATE; MUCOLYTIC AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BRONCHUS SECRETION; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CENTRIFUGATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA; LUNG CANCER; LUNG SMALL CELL CANCER; LUNG SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; MASS SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPUTUM ANALYSIS;

BRONCHUS;

EID: 0032962297     PISSN: 00015547     EISSN: 19382650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000330868     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aponte-Cipriani SL, Teplitz C, Rorat E, Savino A, Jacobs AJ: Cervical smears prepared by an automated device versus the conventional method: A comparative analysis. Acta Cytol 1995;39:623-630
2. Austin RM, Ramzy I: Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations: A review of accumulated data. Acta Cytol 1998;42: 178-184
3. Bahr GF, Bibbo M, Oehme M, Puls JH, Reale FR, Wied GL: An automated device for the production of cell preparations suitable for automatic assessment. Acta Cytol 1978;22: 243-249
4. Biscotti C, Hollow J: ThinPrep versus conventional smear cytologic preparations in the analysis of thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;104:150-153
5. Bishop JW: Comparison of the CytoRich system with conventional cervical cytology: Preliminary data on 3032 cases from a clinical trial site. Acta Cytol 1997;41:24-28
6. Bishop JW, Bigner SH, Colgan TJ, Husain M, Howell LP, McIntosh KM, Taylor DA, Sadeghi MH: Multicenter, masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears, including initial biopsy results. Acta Cytol 1998;42:189-197
7. Bishop JW, MacFarlane K, Cheuvront D, Sims KL: Cell recovery and appearance in thin-layer preparations in non-gynecologic cytology. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 1998;20: 229-237
8. Böcking A: Cytopathologie. In Lehrbuch der Histopathologie: 12. Auflage. Edited by C Thomas. Stuttgart, FK Schattauer Verlag, 1998, pp 411-436
9. Böcking A, Biesterfeld S, Chatelain R, Gien-Gerlach G, Esser E: Diagnosis of bronchial carcinoma on sections of paraffin-embedded sputum: Sensitivity and specificity of an alternative to routine cytology. Acta Cytol 1992;36:37-47
10. Bur M, Knowles K, Pekow P, Corral O, Donovan J: Comparison of ThinPrep preparations with conventional cervicovaginal smears: Practical considerations. Acta Cytol 1995;39: 631-642
11. Carothers A, McGoogan E, Vooijs P, Bird C, Colquhoun M, Eason P, McKie M, Nieuwenhuis F, Pitt P, Rutovitz D, Stark M, Tucker J, Van Orsouw A: A collaborative trial of a semiautomatic system for slide preparation and screening in cervical cytopathology. Analyt Cell Pathol 1994;7:261-274
12. Driel-Kulker Van AMJ, Ploem-Zaaijer JJ, van der Zwan-van der Zwan M, Tanke HJ: A preparation technique for exfoliated and aspirated cells allowing different staining procedures. Analyt Quant Cytol 1980;2:243-246
13. Drings P, Vogt-Moykopf I: Das nicht-kleinzellige Bronchialkarzinom. Dtsch Arztebl 1988;85:A2146-2151
14. Epel D, Weaver AM, Mazia D: Methods for removal of vitelline membrane of sea urchin eggs: I. Use of dithiothreitol. Exp Cell Res 1970;61:64-68
15. Faili V, Nakada HT: The solubilization of glycoprotein mucins and slimes. Pahlavi Med J 1978;9:341-366
16. Friedberg JS, Kaiser LR: Epidemiology of lung cancer. Sem Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;9:56-59
17. Geyer JW, Hancock F, Carrico C, Kirkpatrick M: Preliminary evaluation of CytoRich: An improved automated cytology preparation. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:417-422
18. Hees K, Lebeau PB: Comparison of conventional and Thin-Prep preparations of mucoid cytology samples. Diagn Cytopathol 1995;12:181-185
19. Hirsch SR, Zastrow JE, Kary RC: A comparative in vitro evaluation of sputum-liquefying agents. J Allergy 1969;43: 182-191
20. Howell LP, Davis RL, Belk TI, Agdigos R, Lowe J: The AutoCyte Preparation System for gynecologic cytology. Acta Cytol 1998;42:171-177
21. Husain OA, Page-Roberts BA, Millet JA: A sample preparation for automated cervical cancer screening. Acta Cytol 1978;22:15-21
22. Hutchinson ML, Agarwal P, Denault T, Berger B, Cibas ES: A new look at cervical cytology: ThinPrep Multicenter Trial results. Acta Cytol 1992;36:499-504
23. Hutchinson ML, Cassin CM, Ball HG: The efficacy of an automated preparation device for cervical cytology. Am J Cell Pathol 1991;96:300-305
24. Hutchinson ML, Isenstein LM, Goodman A, Hurley AA, Douglass KL, Mui KK, Patten FW, Zahniser DJ: Homogeneous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep Processor. Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 101:215-219
25. Jany B, Chowanetz W: Bronchialkarzinom-Gibt es eine Früherkennung? Therapiewoche 1987;37:211-215
26. Kato H, Konaka C, Ono J, Takahashi M, Hayata Y: Cytology of the Lung: Techniques and Interpretation. Tokyo, IgakuShoin, 1983
27. Knesel EA: Roche Image Analysis Systems, Inc. Acta Cytol 1996;40:60-66
28. Knesel EA: Roche Image Analysis Systems. In Compendium on the Computerized Cytology and Histology Laboratory. Edited by GL Wied, PH Bartels, DL Rosenthal, U Schenk. Chicago, Tutorials of Cytology, 1994, pp 353-359
29. Lam S, MacAulay C, Palcic B: Detection and localization of early lung cancer by imaging techniques. Chest (suppl 1) 1994;103:12-14
30. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA: Cancer statistics, 1998. CA Cancer J Clin 1998;48:6-29
31. Laverty CR, Farnsworth A, Thurloe JK, Grieves A, Bowditch R: Evaluation of the CytoRich slide preparation process. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 1997;19:239-245
32. Lee KR, Ashfaq R, Birdsong GG, Corkill ME, Mcintosh KM, Inhorn SL: Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:278-284
33. Lee KR, Papillo JL, St John T, Eyerer GJA: Evaluation of the ThinPrep Processor for fine needle aspiration specimens. Acta Cytol 1996;40:895-899
34. Lieberman J: Measurement of sputum viscosity in a cone plate viscometer: II. An evaluation of mucolytic agents. Am Rev Respir Dis 1968;97:662-672
35. McGoogan E, Reith A: Would monolayers provide more representative samples and improved preparations for cervical screening?: Overview and evaluation systems available. Acta Cytol 1996;40:107-119
36. Neugebauer D, Otto K, Soost H-J: Numerical analysis of cell populations in smear and monolayer preparations from the uterine cervix: I. The proportions of isolated, abnormal epithelial cells in slides from one applicator. Analyt Quant Cytol 1981;3:91-95
37. Otto K, Höffken H, Soost HJ: Components and results of a new preparation technique for automated analysis of cervical samples. Analyt Quant Cytol 1979;1:127-135
38. Otto K, Höffken H, Soost HJ: Sedimentation velocity separation: A preparation method for cervical samples. J Histochem Cytochem 1979;27:14-18
39. Oud PS, Haag DJ, Zahniser DJ, Ramaekers FCS, Huysmans ACLM, Veldhuizen JAM, Verheyen RHM, Verrijp K, Broers JLV, Herman CJ, Vooijs GP: Cytopress: Automated slide preparation of cytologic material from suspension. Cytometry 1986;7:8-17
40. Palcic B, Lam S, Hung J, MacAulay C: Detection and localization of early lung cancer by imaging techniques. Chest 1991;99:742-743
41. Papillo JL, Lapen D: Cell yield: ThinPrep vs. cytocentrifuge. Acta Cytol 1994;38:33-36
42. Papillo JL, Zarka MA, St John TL: Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice: A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont. Acta Cytol 1998;42:203-208
43. Rizzo T, Schumann GB, Riding JM: Comparison of the pick-and-smear and Saccomanno methods for sputum cytologic analysis. Acta Cytol 1990;34:875-880
44. Roggli VL, Vollmer RT, Greenberg SD, McGavran MH, Spjut HJ, Yesner R: Lung cancer heterogeneity: A blinded and randomized study of 100 consecutive cases. Hum Pathol 1985;16:569-579
45. Rosenthal DL, Stern E, McLatchie C, Wu A, Lagasse LD, Wall R, Castleman KR: A simple method of producing a monolayer of cervical cells for digital image processing. Analyt Quant Cytol 1979;1:84-88
46. Saccomanno G, Saunders RP, Ellis H: Concentration of carcinoma or atypical cells in sputum. Acta Cytol 1963;7:305-310
47. Scheffner AL: The reduction of in vitro viscosity of mucoprotein solutions by a new mucolytic agent, N-acetyl-L-cysteine. Ann NY Acad Sci 1963;106:298-306
48. Schenck U, Neugebauer D, Otto K, Soost H-J, Wagner D: Monolayer preparation of cervical samples: Cytomorphologic characteristics and differential cytology. Analyt Quant Cytol 1981;3:285-288
49. Schwarz G, Schwarz M, Schenck U: Effect of the special properties of monolayer cell preparations for automated cervical cytology on visual evaluation and classification: With an estimation of the number of cells required to be screened. Analyt Quant Cytol 1983;5:189-193
50. Sprenger E, Schwarzmann P, Kirkpatrick M, Fox W, Heinzerling RH, Geyer JW, Knesel EA: The false negative rate in cervical cytology: Comparison of monolayers to conventional smears. Acta Cytol 1996;40:81-89
51. Takahashi M, Naito M: Application of the CytoRich monolayer preparation system for cervical cytology: A prelude to automated primary screening. Acta Cytol 1997;41:1785-1789
52. Tezuka F, Oikawa H, Shuki H, Higashiiwai H: Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology. Acta Cytol 1996;40:513-518
53. Vassilakos P, Cossali D, Albe X, Alonso L, Hohener R, Puget E: Efficacy of monolayer preparations for cervical cytology: Emphasis on suboptimal specimens. Acta Cytol 1996;40: 496-500
54. Vassilakos P, Griffin S, Megevand E, Campana A: CytoRich liquid-based cervical cytologic test: Screening results in a routine cytopathology service. Acta Cytol 1998;42:198-202
55. Vooijs GP, Niewenhuis F, Oud PS, Hurley AA, Hutchinson ML: Comparison of cytologic diagnoses on conventional and parallel monolayer cervical smears. Am J Clin Pathol 1991; 95:286
56. Wang HH, Sovie S, Trawinski G, Garcia LW, Abu-Jawdeh GM, Upton M, Werneke S: ThinPrep processing of endoscopic brushing specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;105: 163-167
57. Wilbur DC, Facik MS, Rutkowski MA, Mulford DK, Atkison KM: Clinical trials of the CytoRich specimen preparation device for cervical cytology: Preliminary results. Acta Cytol 1997;41:24-29
58. Zahniser DJ, Sullivan PJ: CYTYC Corporation. Acta Cytol 1996;40:37-44