Validity of maximum performance tasks to diagnose motor speech disorders in children

Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-23

  Thoonen, Geert ^a   Maassen, B ^a   Gabreels F ^a   Schreuder, R ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assessment; Maximum performance tasks; Motor speech disorders in children; Validity

Indexed keywords

APRAXIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DYSARTHRIA; HUMAN; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; PERFORMANCE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISORDER; VOWEL;

EID: 0032957156     PISSN: 02699206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/026992099299211     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. BAKKER, K., MAASSEN, B. and THOONEN, G., 1994, Automated assessment of diadochokinetic performance: its accuracy, validity, and reliability. (Mini-seminar presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention, New Orleans, LA.)
2. BRADFORD, A. and DODD, B., 1996, Do all speech-disordered children have motor deficits? Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 10, 77-102.
3. DODD, B., 1995, Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Children with Speech Disorder (London: Whurr).
4. ENDERBY, P. and PHILIPP, R., 1986, Speech and language handicap: towards knowing the size of the problem. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 21, 151-165.
5. KAY COMPUTERIZED SPEECH LAB (CSL), 1997, Motor Speech Profile (Pine Brook, NJ: Kay Elemetrics Corp.).
6. KENT, R. D., KENT, J. F. and ROSENBEK, J. C., 1987, Maximum performance tests of speech production. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 52, 367-387.
7. LOGAN, K. J., YARUSS, J. S. and CONTURE, E. G., 1994, Diadochokinetic assessment with young children: Options for measurement and interpretation. (Mini-seminar presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention, New Orleans, LA.)
8. MORGAN BARRY, R., 1995, The relationship between dysarthria and verbal dyspraxia in children: a comparative study using profiling and instrumental analysis. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 9, 277-309.
9. SCHWARTZ, R. G., 1992, Clinical applications of recent advances in phonological theory. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 269-276.
10. SHRIBERG, L. D., 1994, Five subtypes of developmental phonological disorders. Clinics in Communication Disorders, 4, 38-53.
11. SHRIBERG, L. D. and KWIATKOWSKI, J., 1982, Phonological disorders. I: A diagnostic classification system. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 226-241.
12. SHRIBERG, L. D., ARAM, D. M. and KWIATKOWSKI, J., 1997, Developmental apraxia of speech: I. Descriptive and theoretical perspectives. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 40, 273-285.
13. SHRIBERG, L. D., KWIATKOWSKI, J., BEST, S., HENGST, J. and TERSELIC-WEBER, B., 1986, Characteristics of children with phonological disorders of unknown origin. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 140-161.
14. THOONEN, G., BAKKER, K. and MAASSEN, B., 1990, Computerized determination of diadochokinetic rate and durational variability among dyspraxic and normal-speaking children. (Submitted).
15. THOONEN, G., MAASSEN, B., WIT, J., GABREËLS, F. and SCHREUDER, R., 1996, The integrated use of maximum performance tasks in differential diagnostic evaluations among children with motor speech disorders. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 10, 311-336.
16. WIT, J., MAASSEN, B., GABREËLS, F. and THOONEN, G., 1993, Maximum performance tests in children with developmental spastic dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 452-459.