A circumcision service for religious reasons

BJU International

Volumn 83, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 807-809

  Shah, T ^a   Raistrick, J ^a   Taylor, I ^a   Young, M ^a   Menebhi, D ^a   Stevens, R ^a  

^a ST LUKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Circumcision; NHS; Religious; Training

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CIRCUMCISION; HUMAN; INFANT; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PENIS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREPUCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIGION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

CHILD HEALTH SERVICES; CIRCUMCISION, MALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; RELIGION AND MEDICINE; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 0032956972     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00000.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Niku SD, Stock JA, Kaplan GW. Neonatal circumcision. Urol Clin N Am 1995; 22: 57-65
2. Williams N, Kapila L. Why are children referred for circumcision? Br Med J 1993; 28: 306
3. Poland RL. The question of routine neonatal circumcision. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1312
4. Leitch IO. Circumcision: a continuing enigma. Aust Paediatr J 1970; 6: 59
5. Beechum L. CMC issues guidelines on circumcision. Br Med J 1997; 3: 1573
6. Gelbaum I. Circumcision. To educate, not indoctrinate. J Nur Mid 1992; 37: 97-113