Team leadership: Network differences in women's and men's instrumental and expressive relations

Administration and Policy in Mental Health

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 169-190

  Webster, Cynthia ^a   Grusky, Oscar ^b   Podus, Deborah ^b   Young, Alexander ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKILL; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TEAMWORK;

ADULT; AUTHORITARIANISM; CALIFORNIA; CASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MEN; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATIENT CARE TEAM; SEX FACTORS; WOMEN;

EID: 0032956604     PISSN: 0894587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021394113278     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aldrich, H., Reese, P.R., & Dubini, P. (1989). Women on the verge of a breakthrough: Networking among entrepreneurs in the United States and Italy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1, 339-356.
2. Bass, B.M. (1981). Stogdill's handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York, NY: The Free Press.
3. Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 271-282.
4. Beauchamp, M. A. (1965). An improved index of centrality. Behavioral Science, 10, 161-163.
5. Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1170-1182.
6. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (1992). UCINET IV Version 1.05. Columbia, MD: Analytic Technologies.
7. Bormann, E.G., Pratt, J., & Putnam, L. (1978). Power, authority and sex: Male response to female leadership. Communication Monographs, 45, 119-155.
8. Bradley, P.H. (1980). Sex, competence and opinion deviation: An expectations states approach. Communication Monographs, 47, 101-110.
9. Brass, DJ. (1985). Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 327-343.
10. Eagly, A.., & Johnson, B.T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
11. Eagly, A.H., & Karau, SJ. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 658-710.
12. Eskilson, A., & Wiley, M.G. (1976). Sex composition and leadership in small groups. Sociometry, 39, 183-194.
13. Fairhurst, G.T., & Snavely, B.K. (1983). Majority and token minority group relationships: Power acquisition and communication. Academy of Management Review, 8, 292-300.
14. Fernandez, R.M. (1991). Structural bases of leadership in intraorganizational networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 36-53.
15. Fiorelli, J.S. (1988). Power in work groups: Team member's perspectives. Human Relations, 41, 1-12.
16. Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
17. Hawkins, K.W. (1995). Effects of gender and communication content on leadership emergence in small task-oriented groups. Small Group Research, 26, 234-249.
18. Helgesen, S. (1990). The female adavantage: Women's ways of leadership. New York, NY: Doubleday/Currency.
19. Homans, G.C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms (rev. ed.). New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.
20. Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
21. Ibarra, H. (1993a). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 277-303.
22. Ibarra, H. (1993b). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56-87.
23. Johnson, C. (1993). Gender and formal authority. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 193-211.
24. Johnson, C., Clay-Warner, J., & Funk, S.J. (1996). Effects of authority structures and gender on interaction in same-sex task groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 221-236.
25. Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
26. Knoke, D., & Burt, R.S. (1983). Prominence. In R.S. Burt & M.J. Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis (pp. 195-222). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Krackhardt, D., Blythe, J., & McGrath, C. (1994). KrackPlot 3.0: An improved network drawing program. Connections, 17, 53-55.
28. Krackhardt, D., & Brass, D.J. (1994). Intraorganizational networks: The micro side. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in social network analysis (pp. 207-229). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Leavitt, H.J. (1951). Some effects of communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 38-50.
30. Lincoln, J.R. & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181-199.
31. Lockheed, M.E., & Hall, K.P. (1976). Conceptualizing sex as a status characteristic: Applications to leadership training strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 111-124.
32. Mabry, E.A. (1989). Some theoretical implications of female and male interaction in unstructured small groups. Small Group Behavior, 20, 536-550.
33. Meeker, B., & Elliott, C. (1996). Reward allocations, gender, and task performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 249-301.
34. Meeker, B., & Weitzel-O'Neill, P.A. (1977). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups. American Sociological Review, 42, 91-105.
35. Nieva, F., & Gutek, B.A. (1981). Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Praeger.
36. Owen, W.F. (1986). Rhetorical themes of emergent female leaders. Small Group Behavior, 17, 475-486.
37. Pugh, M.D., & Wahrman, R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746-763.
38. Ridgeway, C. (1988). Gender differences in task groups: A status and legitimacy account. In M. Webster Se M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp.188-206). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39. Rosener, J.B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119-125.
40. Sabidussi, G. (1966). The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 31, 581-603.
41. Salancik, G.R., Calder, B.J., Rowland, K.M., Leblebici, H., & Conway, M. (1975). Leadership as an outcome of social structure and process: A multidimensional analysis. In J.G. Hunt Be L.L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 81-101). Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
42. Salancik, G.R. (1995). Wanted: A good network theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 345-349.
43. Sinclair, A. (1992). The tyranny of a team ideology. Organization Studies, 13, 611-626.
44. Sparrow, R.T., & Liden, R.C. (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22, 522-552.
45. Stanford, J.H., Oates, B.R., & Flores, D. (1995). Women's leadership styles: A heuristic analysis. Women in Management, 10, 9-16.
46. Stewart, P. (1988). Women and men in groups: A status characteristics approach to interaction. In M. Webster & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research, (pp.69-85). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47. Walker, H.A., Ilardi, B.C., McMahon, A.M., & Fennell, M.L. (1996). Gender, interaction, and leadership. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 255-272.
48. Webster, C.M., Grusky, O., Young, A., & Podus, D. (in press). Leadership structures in case management teams: An application of social network analysis. In J.P. Morrissey (Ed.), Research in community mental health. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
49. Winther, D.A., & Green, S.B. (1987). Another look at gender-related differences in leadership behavior. Sex Roles, 16, 41-56.
50. Wood, W., & Karten, S.J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 341-347.