Cost benefit analysis in diagnostic radiology: Glossary and definitions;Nutzen, kosten und analytik in der diagnostischen radiologie: Definitionen und glossar

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Neuen Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 170, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 73-79

  Golder, W ^a,b  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cost efficiency; Cost benefit analysis; Costs; Efficacy; Health technology assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; HEALTH ECONOMICS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION THEORY; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; RADIOGRAPHY; TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 0032955202     PISSN: 09366652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR: The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991; 11: 88-94
2. Maisey MN, Hutton J: Guidelines for the evaluation of radiological technologies. British Institute of Radiology, London 1991
3. Drummond MF, Stoddard GL, Torrance GW: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford. University Press 1987
4. Sutherland JB, Huda W: Costs and benefits of low-osmolality contrast agents in radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J 1989; 40: 18-21
5. Littrup PJ, Goodman AC, Mettlin CJ, Murphy GP, The Investigators of the American Cancer Society: National prostate cancer detection project. Cost Analyses of Prostate Cancer Screening: Frameworks for Discussion. J Urol 1994; 152: 1873-1877
6. Feig SA: Mammographic screening of women aged 40-49 years. Benefit, risk and cost considerations. Cancer 1995; 76: 2097-2106
7. Hunink MGM: Outcomes research and cost-effectiveness analysis in radiology. Eur Radiol 1996; 6: 615-620
8. Jordan JF, Marks MP, Lane B, Steinberg GK: Cost-effectiveness of endovascular therapy in the surgical management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Amer J Neuroradiol 1996; 17: 247-254
9. Langlotz CP, Schnall MD, Malkowicz B, Sanford Schwartz J: Cost effectiveness of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer. Acad Radiol 1996; 3: S24-S27
10. Crowe BL, Hailey D, Beness GT: Costs of magnetic resonance imaging services in public hospitals. Australas Radiol 1990; 34: 219-222
11. Metz CE: Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978; 8: 283-298
12. Goel V, Deber RB, Detsky AS: Nonionic contrast media: economic analysis and health policy development. Can Med Assoc J 1989; 140: 389-395
13. Hillner BE, Philbrick JT, Becker DM: Optimal management of suspected lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis: an evaluation with cost assessment of 24 management strategies. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152: 164-175
14. Mackenzie R, Dixon AK, Keene GS, Hollingworths W, Lomas DJ, Villar RN: Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: assessment of effectiveness. Clin Radiol 1996; 51: 245-250
15. Mackenzie R, Dixon AK: Review: Measuring the effects of imaging: An evaluative framework. Clin Radiol 1995; 50: 513-518
16. Rettig RA: Technology assessment: an update. Invest Radiol 1991; 26: 165-173
17. Wilson IB, Cleary PD: Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. J Amer Med Ass 1995; 273: 59-65
18. Rychlik R: Struktur und Inanspruchnahme gesundheitsökonomischer Evaluation. Gesundh ökon Qual manag 1997; 2: A137-138
19. Hunink MGM, Bos JJ: Triage of patients to angiography for detection of aortic rupture after blunt chest trauma: Cost-Effectiveness analysis of using CT. Amer J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 27-36
20. Caro JJ, Trindade E, McGregor M: The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolaliry contrast media. Amer J Roentgenol 1992; 159: 689-874
21. Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR: Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 1993; 13: 322-338
22. Ware J, Sherbourne C: The MOS 36 - item Short - Form Survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-483
23. Caro JJ, Trindade E, McGregor M: The risks of death and of severe nonfatal reactions with high- vs low osmolality contrast media: a meta-analysis. Amer J Roentgenol 1991; 156: 825-832
24. Dalla-Palma L, Dixon AK, Durand-Zaleski I, Reiser M, Soimakallio S: An overview of cost-effective radiology. Eur Radiol 1997; 7: 147-150
25. The PIOPED Investigators: Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). J Amer Med Ass 1990; 263: 2753-2759
26. Hinzpeter B, Troche CJ, Pfeiffer M. Lauterbach KW: Zur Bedeutung von Kosten-Nutzen-Analysen im Gesundheitswesen. Gesundh ökon Qual manag 1997; 2: 145-150
27. O'Connor P, Detsky AS, Tansey C, Kucharczyk W: Effect of diagnostic testing for multiple sclerosis on patient health perceptions. Arch Neurol 1994; 51: 46-51
28. Hunink MGM: Cost-effectiveness research in radiology. Acad Radiol 1996; 3: S13-S16