Facilitation and interference components in the Simon effect

Archives Italiennes de Biologie

Volumn 137, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 139-149

  Umiltà, Carlo ^a   Rubichi, S ^b   Nicoletti, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FACILITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; REVIEW; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FIXATION, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0032953253     PISSN: 00039829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. CRAFT, J.L. AND SIMON, J.R. Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue. J. Exp Psychol. 83: 415-420, 1970.
2. DE JONG, R., LIANG, C.C. AND LAUBER, E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Perc. Perc., 20: 731-750, 1994.
3. EIMER, M. Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Perc. Perf., 21: 837-854, 1995.
4. EIMER, M., HOMMEL, B. AND PRINZ, W. S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychol., 90: 301-313, 1995.
5. HASBROUCQ, T. AND GUIARD, Y. Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Perc. Perf., 17: 246-266, 1991.
6. HIETANEN, J.K. AND RÄMÄ, P. Facilitation and interference occur at different stages of processing in Simon paradigm. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol., 7: 183-199, 1995.
7. HOMMEL, B. The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychol. Res., 55: 280-290, 1993.
8. KORNBLUM, S. The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychol. Res., 56: 130-135, 1994.
9. KORNBLUM, S. AND LEE, J.W. Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Perc. Perf., 21: 855-875, 1995.
10. LU, C.H. AND PROCTOR R.W. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychon. Bull. Rev., 2: 174-207, 1995.
11. PROCTOR, RW., LU, C.H., WANG, H. AND DUTTA, A. Activation of response codes by relevant and irrelevant stimulus information. Acta Psychol., 90: 275-286, 1995.
12. SCHNEIDER, W. Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behav. Res. Met., Inst. Comp., 20: 206-217, 1988.
13. SIMON, J.R. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. J. Exp. Psychol., 81: 174-176, 1969.
14. SIMON, J.R. AND ACOSTA, E. Jr. Effect of irrelevant information on the processing of relevant information: Facilitation and/or interference? The influence of experimental design. Perc. Psychoph., 31: 383-388, 1982.
15. SIMON, J.R AND CRAFT, J.L. Effects of an irrelevant auditory stimulus on visual choice reaction time. J. Exp. Psychol., 86: 272-274, 1970.
16. SIMON, J.R AND SMALL, A.M. Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. J. App. Psychol., 53: 433-435, 1969.
17. UMILTÀ, C. AND NICOLETTI, R. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Pp. 89-116. In: PROCTOR, R.W. AND REEVE, T.G. (Eds.), Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990.
18. WALLACE, R.J. S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. J. Exp. Psychol., 88: 354-360, 1971.
19. ZORZI, M. AND UMILTÀ, C. A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychol. Res., 58: 193-205, 1995.