Transcutaneous electrogastrography: A non-invasive method to evaluate post-operative gastric disorders?

Hepato-Gastroenterology

Volumn 46, Issue 26, 1999, Pages 1244-1248

  Kauer, Werner K H ^a   Stein, Hubert J ^a   Balint, Andras ^b   Rudiger Siewert, J ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

EGG; Gastric disorders; Post operative

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC ACTIVITY; ELECTROGASTROGRAPHY; FOURIER ANALYSIS; GASTRECTOMY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE; INTESTINE SURGERY; MEAL; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTPRANDIAL STATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPECTROSCOPY; STOMACH DISEASE; STOMACH EMPTYING; STOMACH FUNCTION; STOMACH FUNDOPLICATION; STOMACH MOTILITY; TRUNCUS VAGOTOMY;

ADULT; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; GASTRIC EMPTYING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; POSTGASTRECTOMY SYNDROMES; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0032952639     PISSN: 01726390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. 1 Alvarez WC: The electrogastrogram and what it shows. JAMA 1922; 78:1116-1118.
2. 2 Kothapalli B: Origin of changes in the epigastric impedance signal as determined by a three dimensional model. IEEE Trans 1992; BME-39:1005-1010.
3. 3 Chen J, Vandewalle J, Sansen W, et al: Adaptive spectral analysis of cutaneous electrogastrographic signals using autoregressive spectral moving average modeling. Med Biol Eng Comput 1990; 28:531-536.
4. 4 Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, Hinder RA: Outpatient physiologic testing and surgical management of foregut motility disorders. Cur Probl Surg 1992; 29:415-555.
5. 5 Abell TL, Malagelada JR: Electrogastrography: Current assessment and future perspectives. Dig Dis Sci 1988; 33:982-992.
6. 6 Hamilton JW, Bellahsene BE, Reichelderfer M, et al: Human electrogastrograms. Comparison of surface and mucosal recording. Am J Gastroenterol 1988; 83:806-811.
7. 7 Liang J, Chen J: What can be measured from surface electrogastrography. Computer simulation. Dig Dis Sci 1997; 42:1331-1343.
8. 8 Chen J, McCallum RW: Clinical applications of electrogastrography. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88:1324-1334.
9. 9 Pfaffenbach B, Adamek RJ, Kuhn K, et al: Electrogastrography in healthy subjects. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40:1445-1450.
10. 10 Geldorf H, van der Schee EJ, Blankenstein M, et al: Electrogastrographic study of gastric myoelectrical activity in patients with unexplained nausea and vomiting. Gut 1986; 27:808.
11. 11 Mintchev MP, Kingma YJ, Bowes KL: Accuracy of cutaneous recordings of gastric electrical activity. Gastroenterol 1993; 104:1352-1360.
12. 12 Mintchev MP, Bowes KL: Extracting quantitative information from digital electrogastrograms. Med Biol Eng Comput 1996; 34:244-248.
13. 13 Van der Schee EJ, Smout AJM, Grashuis JL: Application of running spectrum analysis to electrogastrographic signals recorded from dogs and man. In: Wienbeck M (Ed.). Motility of the digestive tract. New York, Raven Press 1982; pp. 241-250.
14. 14 Mintchev MP, Bowes KL: Capabilities and limitations of electrogastrogram. In: Chen JZ, Mc Callum RW (Eds.). Electrogastrography: Principles and Applications. Raven Press, Ltd., New York 1994.
15. 15 Familoni BO, Bowes KL, Kingma YJ, et al: Can transcutaneous recordings detect gastric electrical abnormalities? Gut 1991; 32:141-146.