Common spatial subspace decomposition applied to analysis of brain responses under multiple task conditions: A simulation study

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 110, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 604-614

  Wang, Yunhua ^a,b   Berg, Patrick ^c   Scherg, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Common spatial subspace decomposition; Covariance matrix analysis; Evoked responses; Magnetoencephalography electroencephalography; Multiple cognitive tasks; Spatio temporal dipole model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIPOLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032947239     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(98)00056-X     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aine C, Supek S, George J, Ranken D, Best E, Tiee W, Vigil V, Flynn E, Wood C. MEG studies of human vision: retinotopic organization of V1. In: C. Baumgartner et al. (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Fundamental Research and Clinical Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995;153-161.
2. Babiloni F., Babiloni C., Carducci F., Del Gaudio M., Onorati P., Urbano A. A high resolution EEG method based on the correction of the surface Laplacian estimate for the subject's variable scalp thickness. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 103:1997;486-492.
3. Beisteiner R., Huter D., Edward V., Koch G., Franzen P., Egkher A., Lindinger G., Baumgartner C., Lang W. Brain potentials with old/new distinction of non-words and geometric figures. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 99:1996;517-526.
4. Berg P., Scherg M. A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 90:1994;229-241.
5. Elbert T., Rockstroh B., Kowalik Z.J., Hoke M., Molnar M., Skinner J.E., Birbaumer N. Chaotic brain activity. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 44:1995;441-449.
6. Fukunaga K. Introduction to statistical pattern recognition. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
7. Gevins A., Smith M.E., Le J., Leong H., Bennett J., Martin N., McEvoy L., Du R., Whitfield S. High resolution evoked potential imaging of the cortical dynamics of human working memory. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 98:1996;327-348.
8. Hämäläinen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noinvasive studies of the working human brain, Rev Mod Phys. 65:1993;413-497.
9. Hjorth B. An online transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 39:1975;526-530.
10. Koles Z.J. The quantitative extraction and topographic mapping of the abnormal components in the clinical EEG. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 79:1991;440-447.
11. Koles Z.J., Lazar M.S., Zhou Z. Spatial patterns underlying population differences in the background EEG. Brain Topogr. 2:1990;275-284.
12. Lehmann D., Michel C.M., Pal I., Pascual-Marqui R.D. Event-related potential maps depend on pre-stimulus brain electric microstate map. Int J Neurosci. 74:1994;239-248.
13. Mosher J.C., Lewis P.S., Leahy R.M. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 39:1992;541-557.
14. Nunez PL. Electric fields of the brain, New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
15. Rossini P.M., Deuschl G., Pizzella V., Tecchio F., Pasquarelli A., Feifel E., Romani G.L., Lucking C.H. Topography and sources of electromagnetic cerebral responses to electrical and air-puff stimulation of the hand. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 100:1996;229-239.
16. Sasaki K., Tsujimoto T., Nambu A., Matsuzaki R., Kyuhou S. Dynamic activities of the frontal association cortex in calculating and thinking. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 74:1989;58-75.
17. Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol. 32:1987;11-22.
18. Scherg M. Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. In: Grandori F, Hoke M, Romani GL, editors. Auditory evoked magnetic fields and electric potentials (Advances in audiology, Vol. 6). Basel: Karger, 1990:40-69.
19. Scherg M, Picton TW, Separation and identification of event-related potential components by brain electric source analysis. In: Brunia CHM Mulder G, Verbaten MN, editors. Event-related potentials of the brain (EEG Suppl. 42). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1991:24-37.
20. Scherg M., von Cramon D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 62:1985;32-44.
21. Scherg M., von Cramon D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 65:1986;344-360.
22. Sekihara K., Poeppel D., Marantz A., Phillips C., Koizumi H., Miyashita Y. MEG covariance difference analysis: extraction of target source activities by using task and control measurement. NeuroImage. 5(Suppl.):1997;444.
23. Soong A.C.K., Koles Z.J. Principal-component localization of the sources of the background EEG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 42:1995;59-67.
24. Srebro R., Ogui R.M. Estimating cortical activity from VEPS with the shrinking ellipsoid inverse. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 102:1997;343-355.