Segmentation of tissue architecture by distance graph matching

Cytometry

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 11-22

  Geusebroek, Jan Mark ^a,b   Smeulders, Arnold W M ^a   Cornelissen, Frans ^b   Geerts, Hugo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b JANSSEN RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cell topography; Cellular sociology; Nearest neighbor graphs; Rat hippocampus; Segmentation; Tissue

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIPPOCAMPUS; HISTOCHEMISTRY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; TOPOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; HIPPOCAMPUS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MICROSCOPY, VIDEO; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; RATS; SOFTWARE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0032947127     PISSN: 01964763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19990101)35:1<11::AID-CYTO3>3.0.CO;2-X     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chandebois R. Cell sociology: a way of reconsidering the current concepts of morphogenesis. Acta Biotheor (Leiden) 1976;25:71-102.
2. Dormer KJ. Fundamental tissue geometry for biologists. London: Cambridge University Press; 1980. p 91-145.
3. Honda H. Geometrical models for cells in tissues, Int Rev Cytol 1983;81:191-248.
4. Bigras G, Marcelpoil R, Brambilla E, Brugal G. Cellular sociology applied to neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: quantitative model of neoplastic architecture. Cytometry 1996;24:74-82.
5. Guillaud M, Matthews JB, Harrison A, MacAulay C, Skov K. A novel image cytometry method for quantification of immunohistochemical staining of cytoplasmic antigens. Anal Cell Pathol 1997;14:87-99.
6. Raymond E, Raphael M, Grimaud M, Vincent L, Binet JL, Meyer F. Germinal center analysis with the tools of mathematical morphology on graphs. Cytometry 1993;14:848-861.
7. Darro F, Kruczynski A, Etievant C, Martinez J, Pasteels JL, Kiss R. Characterization of the differentiation of human colorectal cancer cell lines by means of Voronoï diagrams. Cytometry 1993;14:783-792.
8. Palmari J, Dussert C, Berthois Y, Penel C, Martin PM. Distribution of estrogen receptor heterogeneity in growing MCF-7 cells measured by quantitative microscopy. Cytometry 1997;27:26-35.
9. Rodenacker K, Bischoff P. Quantification of tissue sections: graph theory and topology as modelling tools. Pattern Rec Lett 1990;11:275-281.
10. Meijer GA, Beliën JAM, van Diest PJ, Baak JPA. Image analysis in clinical pathology. J Clin Pathol 1997;50:365-370.
11. Vincent L. Graphs and mathematical morphology. Signal Processing 1989;16:365-388.
12. Ahuja N, Tuceryan M. Extraction of early perceptual structure in dot patterns: Integrating region, boundary, and component gestalt. Comput Vision Graphics Image Process 1989;18:304-356.
13. Marcelpoil R, Usson Y. Methods for the study of cellular sociology: Voronoï diagrams and parametrization of the spatial relationships. J Theor Biol 1992;154:359-369.
14. Lavine D, Lambird BA, Kanal LN. Recognition of spatial point patterns. Pattern Rec 1983;16:289-295.
15. Rao CR, Suryawanshi S. Statistical analysis of shape of objects based on landmark data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:12132-12136.
16. Schwarz H, Exner HE. The characterization of the arrangement of feature centroids in planes and volumes. J Microsc 1983;129:155-169.
17. Sankoff D, Kruskal JB. Time warps, string edits and macromoleculcs: the theory and practice of sequence comparison. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1983. p 1-44.
18. Duyckaerts C, Grodefroy G, Hauw JJ. Evaluation of neuronal numerical density by Dirichlet tessellation. J Neurosci Methods 1994;51:47-69.
19. Beucher S, Meyer F. The morphological approach to segmentation: the watershed transformation. In: Dougherty ER, editor Mathematical morphology in image processing. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1993. p 433-481.
20. Wallet F, Dussert C. Multifactorial comparative study of spatial point pattern analysis methods. J Theor Biol 1997;187:437-447.
21. Haseldonckx M, Van Reempts J, Van de Ven M, Wouters L. Protection with lubeluzole against delayed ischemic brain damage in rats. Stroke 1997;28:428-432.
22. Sheiner LB, Beal SL. Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1981;9:503-512.
23. Smeulders AWM, Olabariagga SD, van den Boomgaard R, Worring M. Design considerations for interactive segmentation. In: Jain R, Santini S, editors. Visual information systems 97. San Diego: Knowledge Systems Institute; 1997. p 5-12.