Factors associated with success or failure in radiological interpretation: Diagnostic thinking approaches

Medical Education

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 251-259

  Peterson, Cynthia ^a  

^a ANGLO EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chiropractic, education; Clinical competence; Education, measurement, methods; Education, undergraduate, methods; Problem solving; Questionnaires; Radiology, education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NORMAL HUMAN; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIODIAGNOSIS;

CHIROPRACTIC; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; HUMANS; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOLOGY;

EID: 0032946628     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00295.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Swensson R, Hessel S, Herman P. Omissions in radiology: Faulty search or stringent reporting criteria? Radiology 1977; 123:563-7.
2. Rhea J, Potsaid M, DeLuca S. Errors of interpretation as elicited by a quality audit of an emergency radiology facility. Radiology 1979;132:277-80.
3. Christensen E, Murry R, Holland K, Reynolds J, Landay M, Moore J. The effect of search time on perception. Diagnost Radiol 1981;138:361-5.
4. Doubilet P, Herman P. Interpretation of radiographs: Effect of clinical history. Am J Roentgenology 1981;137:1055-8.
5. Swett H. The power of knowledge in radiologic education and decision making. J Digital Imag 1991;4:199-201.
6. Rubin A. Contributions to cognitive science and educational technology to training in radiology. Invest Radiol 1989;24:729-32.
7. Leshgold A, Feltovich P, Glaser L, Wang Y. The Acquisition of Perceptual Diagnostic Skill in Radiology. Technical Report No. PDS-1. Pittsburgh, PA, USA: University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center; 1981.
8. Smoker W, Berbaum K, Luebke N, Jacoby C. Spatial perception testing in diagnostic radiology. Am J Roentgenology 1984;143:1105-9.
9. Berbaum K, Smoker W, Smith W. Measurement and prediction of diagnostic performance during radiology training. Am J Roentgenology 1985;145:1305-11.
10. Myles-Worsley M, Johnston W, Simons M. The influence of expertise on x-ray image processing. J Exp Psychol: Learning, Memory, Cognition 1988;14:553-7.
11. Hoy R. Radiology in medical undergraduate education. Australasian Radiology 1974;XVIII:269-74.
12. Miller R, Andrew B. View box exercises for teaching problem solving in radiology. Am J Roentgenology 1977;128:271-2.
13. Laws J. Teaching of diagnostic radiology in the undergraduate curriculum. Clin Radiol 1981;32:601-5.
14. Squire L. On teaching radiology to medical students: Challenges for the nineties. Am J Roentgenology 1989;152:457-61.
15. Shulman L, Elstein A. Studies of problem solving judgement and decision making. Rev Res Educ 1975;3:3-42.
16. Barrows H, Norman G, Neufeld V, Feightner J. The clinical reasoning of randomly selected physicians in general medical practice. Clin Invest Med 1982;5:49-55.
17. Gale J, Marsden P. Clinical problem solving: The beginning of the process. Med Educ 1982;16:22-6.
18. Groen G, Patel V. Medical problem solving: Some questionable assumptions. Med Educ 1985;19:95-100.
19. Norman G, Tugwell P, Feightner J, Muzzin L, Jacoby L. Knowledge and clinical problem-solving. Med Educ 1985;19:344-56.
20. Grant J, Marsden P. Primary knowledge, medical education and consultant expertise. Med Educ 1988;22:173-9.
21. Bordage G, Grant J, Marsden P. Quantitative assessment of diagnostic ability. Med Educ 1990;24:413-25.
22. Blane C, Vydareny K, Ten Haken J, Calhoun J. Problem-solving model in radiology for medical students. Australasian Radiology 1989;XXXIII:173-4.
23. Woodward C. Questionnaire construction and question writing for research in medical education. ASME Medical Education Research Booklet No. 4. Med Educ 1988;22:347.
24. Haas M. Statistical methodology for reliability studies. J Manipulative Physiol Therapeut 1991;14:119-32.
25. Ruta D, Garratt A, Wardlaw D, Russell I. Developing a valid and reliable measure of health outcome for patients with low back pain. Spine 1994;19:1887-96.
26. Hicks C. Practical Research Methods for Physiotherapists. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingston; 1992;Ch. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, pp. 52-5, 110-16, 133-142, 153-8, 159-163, 179-183, 200-3, 204-8.
27. Gale J, Marsden P. The role of the routine clinical history. Med Educ 1984;18:96-100.
28. Coles C, Mountford B. Interview surveys in medical and health-care education. Med Educ 1988;22:148-57.
29. Ferguson G, Takane Y. Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. Sixth Edn. Singapore: McGraw-Hill International 1989. pp. 496-8
30. McGuire C. Medical problem-solving: A critique of the literature. J Med Educ 1985;60:587-95.
31. Berbaum K, Franken E, Dorfman D, Rooholamini S, Kathol M, Barloon T, Behlke F, Sato Y, Lu C, El-Khoury G, Flickinger F, Montgomery W. Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. Invest Radiol 1990;25:133-40.
32. Carmody D, Kundel H, Toto L. Comparison scans while reading chest images: Taught but not practised. Invest Radiol 1984;19:462-6.
33. Berbaum K, Franken E, Dorfman D, Barloon T, Ell S, Lu C, Smith W, Abu-Yousef M. Tentative diagnoses facilitate the detection of diverse lesions in chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 1986;21:532-9.