Place code for pitch: A necessary revision

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 140-145

  Zwislocki, Jozef J ^a   Nguyen, M Y ^a  

^a Syracuse Institute for Sensory Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlea; Hair cell; Hensen's cells; High frequency cut off; Peak of transfer function; Transfer function

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; COCHLEA; GERBIL; HAIR CELL; IMPLANT; NONHUMAN; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND INTENSITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; COCHLEA; GERBILLINAE; HAIR CELLS; PITCH DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 0032946422     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016489950181530     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Wever EG. Theory of hearing. New York: Wiley, 1949.
2. Helmholtz HLF. On the sensation of tone. First Eng. trans. by AJ Ellis, 1885: Latest translation by E. Higgins. New York: Dover, 1954.
3. Békésy GV. Experiments in hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.
4. Tasaki I, Davis H, Legouix JP. The spacetime pattern of the cochlear microphonics (guinea pig), as recorded by differential electrodes. J Acoust Soc Am 1952; 24: 502-19.
5. Honrubia V, Ward PH. Longitudinal distribution of the cochlear microphonics inside the cochlear duct (guinea pig). J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 44: 951-8.
6. Rhode WS. Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 1218-31.
7. Liberman MC. The cochlear frequency map of the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 1441-9.
8. Møller AR. Frequency selectivity of the peripheral auditory analyser studied using broad band noise. Acta Physiol Scand 1978; 104: 24-32.
9. Ruggero MA, Rich NC. Application of commercially manufactured Doppler shift laser velocimeter to the measurement of basilar membrane vibration. Hear Res 1991; 51: 215-30.
10. Zwislocki JJ. What is the cochlear place code for pitch? Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991; 111: 256-62.
11. Stevens SS. The relation of pitch to intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1935; 6: 150-4.
12. Russell IJ, Nilsen KE. The location of the cochlear amplifier: spatial representation of a single tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 2660-4.
13. Zhang M, Zwislocki JJ. OHC response recruitment and its correlation with loudness recruitment. Hear Res 1995; 85: 1-10.
14. Oesterle E, Dallos P. Intracellular recordings from supporting cells in the guinea pig cochlea: AC potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 1013-32.
15. Zwislocki JJ, Slepecky NB, Cefaratti LK, Smith RL. Ionic coupling among cells in the organ of Corti. Hear Res 1992; 57: 175-94.
16. Zwislocki JJ, Smith RL. Phase reversal in OHC response at high sound intensities. In: Wilson JP, Kemp DT, eds. Cochlear mechanics. London: Plenum, 1989.
17. Relkin EM, Pelli DG. Probe tone thresholds in the auditory nerve measured by two-interval forced-choice procedures. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 1679-91.
18. Chatterjee M, Zwislocki JJ. Cochlear mechanisms of frequency and intensity coding. I. The place code for pitch. Hear Res 1997; 111: 65-75.
19. Zwislocki JJ, Chatterjee M. Direct evidence for automatic gain control in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 1811.
20. Zwislocki JJ, Szymko YM, Hertig LY. The cochlea is an automatic gain control system after all. In: Lewis ER. Long GR, Lyon RF, et al., eds. Diversity in auditory mechanics. Singapore: World Scientific, 1996.
21. Zhang M, Zwislocki JJ. Intensity dependent peak shift in cochlear transfer functions at the cellular level, its elimination by sound exposure, and its possible underlying mechanisms. Hear Res 1996; 96: 46-58.
22. Szymko YM, Zwislocki JJ, Hertig L. Enhanced cochlear responses after sound exposure. Hear Res 1997; 110: 164-78.
23. Zwicker E, Fastl H. Psychoacoustics. Berlin: Springer, 1990.