HIV testing and prevention: Family planning clinic attenders in London

Sexually Transmitted Infections

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 130-

  Bergenstrom A ^a,b   Sherr, L ^a   Okolo, S ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTH MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFECTION RISK; LETTER; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; VERTICAL TRANSMISSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ETHNIC GROUPS; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; LONDON; MIDDLE AGED; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 0032940821     PISSN: 13684973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Chrystie IL, Zander L, Tilzey A, et al. Is HIV testing in antenatal clinic worthwhile? Can we afford iöAIDSCare 1995;7:135-42.
2. Hawken J, Chard T, Costeloe K, et al. Evaluation of an antenatal HIV testing programme in an inner London health district. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:l-5.
3. Hawken J, Chard T, Costeloe K, el al. Risk factors for HIV infection overlooked on routine antenatal care. J Roy Soc Med 1995;8S:634-6.
4. Simpson WM, Johnstone FD, Boyd FM, et al. Uptake and acceptability of antenatal HIV testing: randomised controlled trial of different methods of offering the test. BMJ 1998;3I6: 262-7.
5. Sherr L, Jefferies S, Victor C, et al. Antenatal HIV testing-which way forward? Psychol Health Med 1996;1:99-111.
6. Radcliffe KW, Tasker T, Evans BA, et al. A comparison of sexual behaviour and risk behaviour for HIV infection between women in three clinical settings. Genitourin Med 1993;69:4415.