Disorders of somesthetic recognition: A theoretical review

Neurocase

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 83-93

  Srinivas, Kavitha ^a   Ogas, Jonathan ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGNOSIA; APHASIA; HUMAN; INSULA; PARIETAL LOBE; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 0032938774     PISSN: 13554794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/neucas/5.2.83     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Bauer RM, Rubens AB. Agnosia. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E, editors. Clinical neuropsychology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985: 187-241.
2. Beauvois MF. Optic aphasia: a process of interaction between vision and language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Series 1982; 298: 35-47.
3. Beauvois MF, Saillant B. Optic aphasia for colors and color agnosia: a distinction between visual and visuo-verbal impairments in the processing of colors. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1985; 2: 1-48.
4. Beauvois M, Saillant B, Meininger V, Lhermitte F. Bilateral tactile aphasia: A tacto-verbal dysfunction. Brain 1978; 101: 381-401.
5. Bonhoeffer K. Partielle reine tastlähmung. Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie 1918; 43: 141-5.
6. Burton H, Videen TO, Raichle ME. Tactile-vibration-activated foci in insular and parietal-opercular cortex studied with positron emission tomography: Mapping the second somatosensory area in humans. Somatosensory and Motor Research 1993; 3: 297-308.
7. Campora G. Astereognosis: Its causes and mechanism. Brain 1925; 18: 65-71.
8. Caselli RJ. Rediscovering tactile agnosia. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1991a; 66: 129-42.
9. Caselli RJ. Bilateral impairment of somesthetically mediated object recognition in humans. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1991b; 66: 357-64.
10. Caselli RJ. Ventrolateral and dorsomedial somatosensory association cortex damage produces distinct somesthetic syndromes in humans. Neurology 1993; 43: 762-71.
11. Corkin S. The role of different cerebral structures in somesthetic perception. In: Carterette CE, Friedman MP, editors. Handbook of perception. Vol. VIB. New York: Academic Press, 1978: 105-55.
12. Coslett HB, Saffran EM. Preserved object recognition and reading comprehension in optic aphasia. Brain 1989; 1091-110.
13. Coslett HB, Saffran EM. Optic aphasia and the right hemisphere: A replication and extension. Brain and Language 1992; 43: 148-61.
14. Delay J. Les astereognosis. Pathologie du toucher. Clinique, physiologique, topographie. Paris: Masson, 1935.
15. De Renzi E, Saetti MC. Associative agnosia and optic aphasia: Qualitative or quantitative difference? Cortex 1997; 33: 115-30.
16. Efron R. What is perception? Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 4. New York: Humanities Press, 1968.
17. Endo K, Miyasaka M, Makishita H, Yangisawa N, Sugishita M. Tactile agnosia and tactile aphasia: Symptomatological and anatomical differences. Cortex 1992; 28: 445-69.
18. Endo K, Makishita H, Yangisawa N, Sugishita M. Modality specific naming and gesture disturbances: A case of optic aphasia, bilateral tactile aphasia, optic apraxia, and tactile apraxia. Cortex 1996; 32: 3-28.
19. Evans JP. A study of the sensory defects resulting from excision of cerebral substance in humans. Research Publications, Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Diseases 1935; 15: 331-70.
20. Farah MJ. Visual agnosia. Disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.
21. Friedman D, Jones E, Burton H. Representation pattern in the second somatic sensory area of the monkey cerebral cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1980; 192: 21-41.
22. Friedman D, Murray E, O'Neill B, Mishkin M. Cortical connections of the somatosensory fields of the lateral sulcus of macaques: evidence for a corticolimbic pathway for touch. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1986; 252: 323-47.
23. Foix C. Sur une variété de troubles bilatéraux de la sensibilité par lésion unilatérale du cervaeu. Revue Neurologique 1922; 29: 322-31.
24. Garcha HS, Ettlinger G. The effects of unilateral or bilateral removals of the second somatosensory cortex (area SII): a profound tactile disorder in monkeys. Cortex 1978; 14: 319-26.
25. Garcha HS, Ettlinger G. Tactile discrimination learning in the monkey: the effects of bilateral or unilateral removals of the second somatosensory cortex (SII). Cortex 1980; 16: 397-412.
26. Gerstmann J. Reine taktile agnosie. Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie 1918; 44: 329-13.
27. Goldstein K. Über kortikale sensibilitätsstörungen. Neurologisches Zentralblatt 1916; 35: 825-7.
28. Goodale MA, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience 1992; 15: 20-5.
29. Greenspan JD, Winfield JA. Reversible pain and tactile deficits associated with a cerebral tumor compressing the posterior insula and parietal operculum. Pain 1992; 50: 29-39.
30. Hécaen H, David M. Syndrome pariétal traumatique: Asymbolie tactile et hémiasomatognosie paroxystique et douloureuse. Revue Neurologique 1945; 77: 113-24.
31. Hillis AE, Caramazza A. Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying visual and semantic processing: Implications from optic aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1995; 7: 457-78.
32. Hoff F. Balkentumor mit linksseitiger astereognosis und apraxie. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Nervenheilkunde 1931; 123: 89-100.
33. Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ. To see but not to see: A case study of visual agnosia. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987.
34. Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ. The intelligent hand. In: Bower GH, editor. The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 21. San Diego: Academic Press, 1987: 121-51.
35. Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Reed C. Haptic integration of object properties: Texture, hardness and planar contour. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989; 15: 45-57.
36. Knecht S, Kunesch E, Schnitzler A. Parallel and serial processing of haptic information in man: Effects of parietal lesions on sensorimotor hand function. Neuropsychologia 1996; 7: 669-87.
37. Koch K, Fuster J. Unit activity in monkey parietal cortex related to haptic perception and temporary memory. Experimental Brain Research 1989; 76: 292-306.
38. Ledberg A, O'Sullivan BT, Kinomura SE, Roland PE. Somatosensory activations of the parietal operculum in man. A PET study. European Journal of Neuroscience 1995; 7: 1934-41.
39. Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL. Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology 1987; 19: 342-68.
40. Lynch J. The functional organization of posterior parietal association cortex. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1980; 3: 485-534.
41. Marie P, Boutier H, Van Boegert L. Sur un cas de tumeur préfrontale droite. Troubles de l'orientation dans l'espace. Revue Neurologique 1924; 31: 209-21.
42. Mauguière F, Desmedt JE, Courjon J. Astereognosis and dissociated loss of frontal and parietal components of somatosensory evoked potentials in hemispheric lesions. Brain 1983; 106: 271-311.
43. Mishkin M. Analogous neural models for tactual and visual learning. Neuropsychologia 1979; 17: 139-51.
44. Murray E, Mishkin M. Relative contributions of SII and Area 5 to tactile discimination in monkeys. Behavioral Brain Research 1984; 11: 67-83.
45. O'Sullivan BT, Roland PE, Kawashima R. A PET study of somatosensory discrimination in man: microgeometry vs. macrogeometry. European Journal of Neuroscience 1994; 6: 137-48.
46. Oppenheim H. Über einen bemerkenswerten fall von tumor cerebri. Berliner Kinische Wochenschrift 1906; 30: 1001-4.
47. Pause M, Freund HJ. Role of the parietal cortex in sensorimotor transformation: Evidence from clinical observations. Brain Behavior Evolution 1989; 33: 136-40.
48. Pause M, Kunesch E, Binkofski F, Freund HJ. Sensorimotor disturbances in patients with lesions of the parietal cortex. Brain 1989; 112: 1599-625.
49. Platz T. Tactile agnosia: Casuistic evidence and theoretical remarks on modality-specific meaning representations and sensorimotor integration. Brain 1996; 119: 1565-74.
50. Poggio E. Die korticale legalization der asymbolie. Neurologisches Zentralblatt 1908; 27: 817-8.
51. Randolph M, Semmes J. Behavioral consequences of selective subtotal ablations in the postcentral gyrus of Macaca mulatta. Brain Research 1974; 70: 55-70.
52. Ratcliff G, Newcombe F. Object recognition: some deductions from clinical evidence. In: Ellis AW, editor. Normality and pathology in clinical functions. London: Academic Press, 1982.
53. Reed CL, Caselli RJ. The nature of tactile agnosia: A case study. Neuropsychologia 1994; 32: 527-39.
54. Reed CL, Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL. Haptic integration of planar size with hardness, texture, and planar contour. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1990; 44: 522-45.
55. Reed CL, Caselli RJ, Farah MJ. Tactile agnosia: Underlying impairment and implications for normal tactile object recognition. Brain 1996; 119: 875-88.
56. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW. Visual object processing in optic aphasia: a case of semantic access agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1987; 4: 131-85.
57. Roland PE. Astereognosis. Archives of Neurology 1976; 33: 543-50.
58. Roland PE, O'Sullivan B, Kawashima R. Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1998; 95: 3295-300.
59. Rose F, Egger M. Stéréoagnosie et asymbolie tactile. Semaine Médicale 1908; 44: 517-24.
60. Semmes J. A non-tactual factor in astereognosis. Neuropsychologia 1965; 3: 295-315.
61. Srinivas K, Greene A, Easton R. Visual and haptic memory for 2D patterns: Evidence for metric representation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1997a; 4: 535-41.
62. Srinivas K, Greene A, Easton R. Implicit and explicit memory for haptically experienced 2D patterns. Psychological Science 1997b; 8: 243-7.
63. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW, editors. Analysis of visual behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1982: 549-86.