Too late for the midwife toad: Stress, variability and Hsp90

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 169-171

  McLaren, Anne ^a  

^a WELLCOME CRC INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 90;

DROSOPHILA; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HOMOZYGOSITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; STRESS;

ALYTES OBSTETRICANS; ANURA;

EID: 0032936661     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01732-1     Document Type: Short Survey

References (21)

1. Rutherford S.L., Lindquist L. Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature. 396:1998;336-342.
2. Waddington C.H. Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature. 150:1942;563-565.
3. Waddington C.H. Genetic assimilation of an acquired character. Evolution. 7:1953;118-126.
4. Koestler A. The Case of the Midwife Toad. 1971;Hutchinson.
5. Durrant A. Induction and growth of flax genotrophs. Heredity. 27:1971;277-298.
6. Schneeberger R.G., Cullis C.A. Specific DNA alterations associated with the environmental induction of heritable changes in flax. Genetics. 128:1991;619-630.
7. Roemer I.et al. Epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Curr. Biol. 7:1997;277-280.
8. Belyaev D.K. Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. J. Hered. 70:1979;301-308.
9. Darwin C.R. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. 1868;John Murray.
10. Wade M.J.et al. Genetic variation segregating in natural population of Tribolium castaneum affecting traits observed in hybrids with T. freemani. Genetics. 147:1997;1235-1247.
11. Livesay E.A. An experimental study of hybrid vigor or heterosis in rats. Genetics. 15:1930;17-54.
12. 1 hybrid and random bred mice to a narcotic drug. J. Genet. 54:1956;440-455.
13. Michie D. Towards uniformity in experimental animals. Coll. Pap. Lab. Anim. Bur. 3:1955;37-47.
14. McLaren A., Michie D. Are inbred strains suitable for bioassay? Nature. 173:1954;686-688.
15. Biggers J.D., Claringbold P.J. Why use inbred lines? Nature. 174:1954;596.
16. Ashoub M.R.et al. The effect of the environment on phenotypic variability. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 148:1958;192-203.
17. Went F.W. Gene action in relation to growth and development. I. Phenotypic variability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 39:1953;839-848.
18. Robertson F.W., Reeve E.C.R. Heterozygosity, environmental variation and heterosis. Nature. 170:1952;286.
19. Mather K. Genetic control of stability in development. Heredity. 7:1953;297-336.
20. Lerner I.M. Genetic Homeostasis. 1954;Oliver and Boyd.
21. Durrant A. The environmental induction of heritable change in Linum. Heredity. 17:1962;27-61.