Reduction of motor artifact in antidromic ulnar sensory studies

Muscle and Nerve

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 520-522

  Rutkove, Seward B ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Nerve conduction studies; Sensory responses; Ulnar nerve; Volume conduction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTIDROMIC STIMULATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY NERVE CONDUCTION; ULNAR NERVE;

ADULT; ARTIFACTS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSATION; ULNAR NERVE;

EID: 0032936022     PISSN: 0148639X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199904)22:4<520::AID-MUS15>3.0.CO;2-7     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Brashear A, Kincaid JC. The influence of the reference electrode on CMAP configuration: leg nerve observations and an alternative reference site. Muscle Nerve 1996;19:63-67.
2. Dumitru D, DeLisa JA. AAEM Minimonograph #10: volume conduction. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:605-624.
3. Dumitru D, Jewett DL. Far-field potentials. Muscle Nerve 1993;16:237-254.
4. Kimura J, Kimura A, Ishida T, Kudo Y, Suzuki S, Machida M, Matsuoka H, Yamada T. What determines the latency and amplitude of stationary peaks in far-field recordings? Ann Neurol 1986;19:479-486.
5. Kincaid JC, Brashear A, Markand ON. The influence of the reference electrode on CMAP configuration. Muscle Nerve 1993;16:392-396.
6. Oh SJ. Clinical electromyography: nerve conduction studies, second edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1993. p 285.
7. Wee AS, Ashley RA. Effect of interelectrode recording distance on morphology of the antidromic sensory nerve action potentials at the finger. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990:93-96.