Influence of culture medium and in vitro conditions on shoot regeneration in Solanum phureja monoploids and fertility of regenerated doubled monoploids

Plant Breeding

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 53-57

  Paz, M M ^a   Veilleux, R E ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Endopolyploidization; Haploid inbred lines silver thiosulphate; Solanum phureja

Indexed keywords

BENZYLADENINE; CALLUS CULTURE; CLONE; CULTURE MEDIUM; DIPLOIDY; FEMALE FERTILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; HOMOZYGOSITY; LIGHT; PLANT BREEDING; SHOOT TIP CULTURE; SILVER THIOSULFATE;

EID: 0032935971     PISSN: 01799541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0523.1999.118001053.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Austin, S., and A. C. Cassells, 1983: Variation between plants regenerated from individual calli produced from separated potato stem callus cells. Plant Sci. Lett. 31, 107-114.
2. Cardi, T., V. Iannamico, F. D'Ambrosio, E. Filippone, and P. F. Lurquin, 1993: In vitro regeneration and cytological characterization of shoots from leaf explants of three accessions of Solanum commersonii. Plant. Cell. Tiss. Org. Cult. 34, 107-114.
3. De, Maine, M. J., and J. A. Fantes, 1983: The results of colchicine treatment of dihaploids and their implications regarding the efficiency of chromosome doubling and potato histogeny. Potato Res. 26, 289-294.
4. Dhingra, M. K., S. M. Paul Khurana, T. N. Lakhanpal, and R. Chandra, 1991: Effect of cytokinins and light on the growth and virus content of potato leaf callus. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 14, 117-120.
5. Fish, N., and M. G. K. Jones, 1988: A comparison of tissue culture response between related tetraploid and dihaploid S. tuberosum genotypes. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 15, 201-210.
6. Fleming, M. L. M. H., M. J. De, Maine, and W. Powell, 1992: Ploidy doubling by callus culture of potato dihaploid leaf explants and the variation in regenerated plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 121, 183-188.
7. Gavinlertvatana, P., and P. H. Li, 1980: The influence of 2-4 D and kinetin on leaf callus formation in different potato species. Potato Res. 23, 115-120.
8. Hawkes, J. G., 1963: A Revision of Tuber-bearing Solanums, Annual Report. 1963, 2nd edn, 76-181. Scottish Plant Breeding Station, Pentland-Field.
9. _, 1994: Origins of cultivated potatoes and species relationships. In: J. E. Bradshaw, and G. R. Mackay (eds), Potato Genetics, 3-42. University Press, Cambridge.
10. _, and J. P. Hjerting, 1989: The Potatoes of Bolivia. Their Breeding Value and Evolutionary Relationships. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
11. Haynes, F. L., 1972: The use of cultivated Solanum species in potato breeding. In: E. R. French, ed., Prospects for the Potato in the Developing World: an International Symposium on Key Problems and Potentials for the Greater Use of the Potato in the Developing World. Lima, Peru, 100-110. Int. Potato Center, Lima.
12. Hermsen, J. G. Th., M. S. Ramanna, S. Roest, and G. S. Bokelmann, 1981: Adventitious shoot formation on in vitro cultivated leaf explants from diploid interspecific potato hybrids. Euphytica 30, 239-246.
13. Jacobsen, E., 1981: Polyploidization in leaf callus tissue and in regenerated plants of dihaploid potato. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 1, 77-84.
14. Karp, A., R. Risiott, M. G. K., Jones, and S. W. J. Bright, 1984: Chromosome doubling in monohaploid and dihaploid potatoes by regeneration from cultured leaf explants. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 3, 363-373.
15. Lanaud, C., 1987: Doubled haploids of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) 1. Observations of fertility. Plant Breeding 99, 187-195.
16. Lashermes, P., E. Couturon, and A. Charrier, 1994: Doubled haploids of Coffea canephora: development, fertility and agronomic characteristics. Euphytica 74, 149-157.
17. M'Ribu, H. K., and R. E. Veilleux, 1990: Effect of genotype, explant, subculture interval and environmental conditions on regeneration of shoots from in vitro monoploids of a diploid potato species, Solanum phureja Juz & Buk. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 23, 171-179.
18. Murashige, T., and F. Skoog, 1962: A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473-497.
19. Owen, H. R., R. E. Veilleux, D. Levy, and D. L. Ochs, 1988: Environmental, genotypic, and ploidy effects on endopolyploidization within a genotype of Solanum phureja and its derivatives. Genome 30, 506-510.
20. Perl, A., D. Aviv, and E. Galun, 1988: Ethylene and in vitro culture of potato: suppression of ethylene generation vastly improves protoplast yield, plating efficiency and transient expression of an alien gene. Plant Cell Rep. 7, 403-406.
21. Ross, H., 1986: Potato Breeding - Problems and Perspectives. Pau Parey, Berlin.
22. SAS, 1985: SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary.
23. Snider, K. T. and R. E. Veilleux, 1994: Factors affecting variability in anther culture and in conversion of androgenic embryos of Solanum phureja. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 36, 345-354.
24. Uijtewaal, B. A., 1987: Ploidy variability in greenhouse cultured and in vitro propagated potato Solanum phureja monohaploids (2n = x = 12) as determined by flow cytometry. Plant Cell Rep. 6, 252-255.
25. Veilleux, R. E., 1990: Solanum phureja: anther culture and the induction of haploids in a cultivated diploid potato species. In: Y. P. S. Bajaj (ed.), Haploids in Crop Improvement I, 530-543. Springer-Verlag. Berlin.
26. _. J. Booze-Daniels, and E. Pehu, 1985: Anther culture of a 2n pollen producing clone of Solanum phureja Juz. & Buk. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 27, 559-564.
27. Wareh, H. A., N. L. Trolinder, and J. R. Goodin, 1989: Callus initiation, shoot regeneration, and micropropagation of three potato cultivars. HortScience 24, 680-682.
28. Webb, K. J., E. O. Osifo, and G. G. Henshaw, 1983: Shoot regeneration from leaflet discs of six cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. tuberosum). Plant Sci. Lett. 30, 1-8.
29. Wheeler, V. A., N. E. Evans, D. Foulger, J. J. Webb, A. Karp, J. Franklin, and S. W. J. Bright, 1985: Shoot formation from explant cultures of fourteen potato cultivars and studies of the cytology and morphology of regenerated plants. Ann. Bot. 55, 309-320.