Techniques for health status measurement in the management of rheumatoid arthritis

BioDrugs

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 21-30

  Houssien, Dhiya A ^a   Carr, Alison J ^a  

^a KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISABILITY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS;

EID: 0032935831     PISSN: 11738804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00063030-199911010-00003     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. 1. Liang M. The historical and conceptual framework for functional assessment in rheumatic disease. J Rheumatol 1987; 14 Suppl. 15: 2-5
2. 2. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences: I. Measurement strategies. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 345-54
3. 3. World Health Organization. The International Classification of Impairments Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva. WHO, 1980
4. 4. World Health Organization. ICIDH-2: international classification of impairments, activities and participation. A manual of dimensions of disablement and functioning: beta-1 draft for field trials. Geneva: WHO, 1997
5. 5. Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality of life measurements. JAMA 1994; 272: 619-26
6. 6. Steinbroker O, Trager CH, Batterman RC. Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA 1949; 140: 659-65
7. 7. Hochberg MC, Chang RW, Dwosh I, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35: 498-502
8. 8. Stucki G, Stoll T, Bruhlmann P, et al. Construct validation of the ACR 1991 revised criteria for global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1995; 13: 349-52
9. 9. Anderson II, Felson DT, Meenan RF, et al. Which traditional measures should be used in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials? Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32: 1093-99
10. 10. Pincus T, Callahan LF, Vaughn WK. Questionnaire, walking time and button test measures of functional capacity as predictive markers for mortality in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 240-51
11. 11. Newcomer KL, King HE, Mahowald ML. Validity and reliability of the timed-stands test for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic diseases. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 21-7
12. 12. Liang MR, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990; 28: 632-42
13. 13. Carr AJ, Thompson PW, Young A. Do health status measures have a role in rheumatology? A survey of the use of and attitudes towards health status measures in the UK. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40 Suppl.: S261
14. 14. Stucki G, Sangha O. Clinical quality management: putting the pieces together. Arthritis Care Res 1996; 9: 405-12
15. 15. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, et al. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980: 23: 137-45
16. 16. Pincus T, Callahan LF. Rheumatology function tests: grip strength, walking time, button tests and questionnaires document and predict long-term morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1992; 19: 1051-7
17. 17. Ramey DR, Raynauld JP, Fries JF. The Health Assessment Questionnaire 1992: status and review. Arthritis Care Res 1992; 5: 119-29
18. 18. Fitzpatrick R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, et al. A generic health status instrument in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1992; 31: 87-90
19. 19. Kirwan JR, Reeback JS. Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire modified to assess disability in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1986; 25: 206-9
20. 20. Stewart MW, Palmer DC, Knight RG, et al. A self-report articular index: relationship to variations in mood and disease activity measures. Br J Rheumatol 1993; 32: 631-2
21. 21. Tennant A, Hillman M, Fear J, et al. Are we making the most of the Standford Health Assessment Questionnaire? Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 574-8
22. 22. van den Ende CH, Hazes JM, Le Cessie S, et al. Discordance between objective and subjective assessment of functional ability of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1995; 34: 951-5
23. 23. Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci Jr SA, et al. Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1983; 26: 1346-53
24. 24. Ziebland S, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, et al. Comparison of two approaches to measuring change in health status in rheumatoid arthritis: the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and modified HAQ. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51: 1202-5
25. 25. Wolfe F. Data collection and utilization: a methodology for clinical practice and clinical research. In: Wolfe F, Pincus T, editors. Rheumatoid arthritis: pathogenesis, assessment, outcome, and treatment. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994: 463-514
26. 26. Meenan RF, Gertman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health status in arthritis: the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 146-52
27. 27. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, et al. Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL. A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963; 185: 914-9
28. 28. Brook RH, Ware Jr JE, Davies-Avery A, et al. Overview of adult health status measures fielded in Rand's Health Insurance Study. Med Care 1979; 17 Suppl. 7: 1-131
29. 29. Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status index: category ratings versus magnitude estimation for measuring levels of well-being. Med Care 1979; 17: 501-23
30. 30. Katz JN, Larson MG, Philips CB, et al. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status measures. Med Care 1992; 30: 917-25
31. 31. Brown JH, Kazis LE, Spitz PW, et al. The dimensions of health outcomes: a cross-validated, examination of health status measurement. Am J Public Health 1984; 74: 159-61
32. 32. Houssien DA, Choy EHS, Carr A, et al. The outcome of rheumatoid arthritis in routine clinical practice: a comparison of different outcome measures [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40 Suppl.: S152
33. 33. Pincus T, Callahan LF, Sale WG, et al. Severe functional declines, worse disability, and increased mortality in seventy-five rheumatoid arthritis patients studied over nine years. Arthritis Rheum 1984; 27: 864-72
34. 34. Reeback J, Silman A. Predictors of outcome at two years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J R Soc Med 1984; 77: 1002-5
35. 35. Sherrer YS, Bloch DA, Mitchell DM, et al. The development of disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 494-500
36. 36. Nevitt MC, Yelin EH, Henke CJ, et al. Risk factors for hospitalization and surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: implications for capitated medical payment. Ann Intern Med 1986 Sep; 105 (3): 421-8
37. 37. Sherrer YS, Block DA, Mitchell DM, et al. Disability in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of prognosis factors across three populations. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 705-9
38. 38. Wolfe F, Kleinheksel SM, Cathey MA, et al. The clinical value of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Functional Disability Index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1480-8
39. 39. Pincus T, Callahan LF, Brooks RH, et al. I: self-report questionnaire scores in rheumatoid arthritis compared with traditional physical, radiographic and laboratory measures. Ann Intern Med 1989; 110: 259-66
40. 40. Kazis LE, Callahan LF, Meenan RF, et al. Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 1243-53
41. 41. Meenan RF. Response. Marketing and the American College of Rheumatology: a professional approach for a professional society. Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33: 439-40
42. 42. Anderson KO, Keefe FJ, Bradley LA, et al. Prediction of pain behavior and functional status of rheumatoid arthritis patients using medical status and psychological variables. Pain 1988; 33: 25-32
43. 43. Dailey PA, Bishop GD, Russell IJ, et al. Psychological stress and the fibrositis/fibromyalgia syndrome. J Rheumatol 1990; 17: 1380-5
44. 44. Bell M, Bombardier C, Tugwell P. Measurement of functional status, quality of life, and utility in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990; 33: 591-601
45. 45. EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199-208
46. 46. Carr-Hill R. A second opinion: health related quality of life measurement - Eurostyle. Health Policy 1992; 20: 321-8
47. 47. Brazier J, Harper R, Waterhouse J, et al. Comparison of outcome measures for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 5th European Health Services Research Conference; 1993 Dec: Maastricht
48. 48. Hurst NP, Kind P, Ruta D, et al. Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQuol (EQ-5D). Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36: 551-9
49. 49. Bergner M, Babbitt RA, Pollard WE. The Sickness Impact Profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care 1976; 14: 57-67
50. 50. Patrick D. Standardisation of comparative health status measure: using scales developed in America in an English-speaking country. 3rd Biennial Conference on Health survey research methods; Hyattsville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, 1981
51. 51. Chambers L, MacDonald L, Tugwell P, et al. The McMaster Health Index Questionnaire as a measure of quality of life for patients with rheumatoid disease. J Rheumatol 1982; 9: 780-4
52. 52. Hunt S, McEwen P, McKenna S. Measuring health status. London: Croom Helm, 1986
53. 53. Hunt S, McEwen P. The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Health Illness 1980; 2: 231-46
54. 54. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83
55. 55. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, et al. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19: 787-805
56. 56. Stross JK, Schumacher HR, Weisman MH, et al. Changing behavior and improving outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 1985; 28: 1163-7
57. 57. Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick RA. Measurement of health status in patients with chronic illness: comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the General Health Questionnaire. Fam Pract 1990; 7: 121-4
58. 58. Fitzpatrick R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, et al. A comparison of the sensitivity to change of several health status instruments in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 429-36
59. 59. Fitzpatrick R, Newman S, Archer R, et al. Social support, disability and depression: a longitudinal study of rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med 1991; 33: 605-11
60. 60. Mckenna S, Hunt S, Tennant A. The development of a patient-completed index of a completed index of distress from the Nottingham health profile: a new measure for use in cost-utility studies. J Med Econ 1993; 6: 13-24
61. 61. Houssien DA, McKenna S, Scott DL. The Nottingham Health Profile as a measure of disease activity and outcome in RA. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36: 69-73
62. 62. Donovan JL, Frankel SJ, Eyles JD. Assessing the need for health status measures. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993; 47: 158-62
63. 63. Jenkinson C. Why are we weighting? A critical examination of the use of item weight in a health status measure. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 1413-6
64. 64. Kind P, Car-Hill R. The NHP: a useful tool for epidemiologists? Soc Sci Med 1987; 25: 905-10
65. 65. Brook RH, Ware JE, Davies-Avery A, et al. Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomised controlled trial. N Engl J Med 1983; 309: 1426-34
66. 66. Ware JE, Brook RH, Rogers WH, et al. Comparison of health outcomes at a health maintenance organisation with those of fee-for-service care. Lancet 1986; 1: 1017-22
67. 67. Tarlove AR, Ware JE, Greenfield S, et al. The Medical Outcome Study: an application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 1989; 262: 925-30
68. 68. Brazier JE, Harper RA, Jones NMB, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992; 305: 160-4
69. 69. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 1993; 29/306: 1437-40
70. 70. Jenkinson C, Peto V, Coulter A. Measuring change over time: a comparison of results from a global single item of health status and the multi-dimensional SF-36 health status survey questionnaire in patients presenting with menorrhagia. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 317-21
71. 71. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 1: 247-63
72. 72. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JF, et al. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40-66
73. 73. Talamo J, Frater A, Gallivan S, et al. Use of the short form 36 (SF36) for health status measurement in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36: 463-9
74. 74. Houssien DA, Whalley D, McKenna S, et al. The value of health status measures in the assessment of RA. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36 Suppl. 1: 150
75. 75. Hill S, Harries U, Popay J. Is the short form 36 (SF-36) suitable for routine health outcomes assessment in health care for older people? Evidence from preliminary work in community based health services in England. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996; 50: 94-8
76. 76. Hayes V, Morris J, Wolfe C, et al. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults? Age Aging 1995; 24: 120-5
77. 77. Jenkinson C. MYMOP, a patient generated measure of outcomes: research into outcomes has moved away from symptom based assessments [letter]. BMJ 1996; 313: 626-7
78. 78. Tennant A, Hillman M, Chamberlain M, et al. Missing values and the MOS SF36. An over-55 year old sample with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38 Suppl. 9: S178
79. 79. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE. The MOS Short Form General Health Survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 1988; 26 (7): 724-35
80. 80. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 369-95
81. 81. Tuttleman M, Pillemer SR, Tilley BC, et al. A cross sectional assessment of health status instruments in patients with RA participating in a clinical trial. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 1910-5
82. 82. Ware JE, Keller SD, Hatoum HT, et al. An arthritis-specific SF-36 health index: development and cross-validation in relation to changes in disease severity. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39 Suppl.: 90
83. 83. de Jong Z, van der Heijde D, McKenna S, et al. The reliability and construct validity of the RAQoL: a rheumatoid arthritis-specific quality of life instrument. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36: 878-3
84. 84. Hunt SM, McKenna SP. The QLDS: a scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression. Health Policy 1992; 22: 307-19
85. 85. McGee HM, O'Boyle CA, Hickey A, et al. Assessing the quality of life of the individual: the SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit population. Psychol Med 1991; 21: 749-59
86. 86. Hickey AM, Bury G, OBoyle CA, et al. A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. BMJ 1996; 313 (7048): 29-33
87. 87. Carr AJ. A patient-centred approach to evaluation and treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: the development of a clinical tool to measure patient-perceived handicap. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 921-32
88. 88. Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW, et al. The MACTAR patient preference disability questionnaire: an individualized functional priority approach for assessment of improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 44-51
89. 89. Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW, et al. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: impact on quality of life assessed by traditional standard-item and individualized patient preference health status questionnaires. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 59-62
90. 90. Liang M, Larson M, Cullen K, et al. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum 1985; 28: 542-7
91. 91. Spector TD, Hochberg MC. An epidemiological approach to the study of outcome in rheumatoid arthritis. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 1992; 6: 235-46