A comparison of transrectal ultrasonography and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma

BJU International

Volumn 83, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 796-800

  Ekici, S ^a,c   Ozen H ^a   Agildere, M ^b   Ergen, A ^a   Ozkardes H ^b   Ayhan, A ^a   Kendi, S ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Accuracy; MRI; Prostate cancer; Sensitivity; Specificity; Staging; Transrectal ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; SEMINAL VESICLE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

AGED; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 0032935104     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00017.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Epstein J, Carmichael M, Walsh PC. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicles: definition and relation to tumor volume, grade and margin of resection to prognosis. J Urol 1993; 149: 1040-5
2. Epstein JI, Carmichael MJ, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long term follow-up. J Urol 1993; 150: 135-41
3. Catalona WJ, Biggs SW. Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients. J Urol 1990; 143: 538-44
4. Rosen MA, Goldstone L, Lapin S, Wheeler T, Scardino PT. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1992; 148: 331-7
5. Perrapato SD, Carothers GG, Maatman TJ, Soechtig CE. Comparing clinical staging plus transrectal ultrasound with surgical-pathological staging of prostate cancer. Urology 1989; 33: 103-5
6. Scardino PT, Shinohara K, Wheeler TM, Carter S. Staging of prostate cancer: value of ultrasonography. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 713-40
7. Andriole GL, Colpen DE, Mikkelson DJ, Catalona WJ. Sonographic and pathological staging of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1989; 142: 1259-61
8. Quinn SF, Franziui DA, Demlow TA et al. MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: correlation with whole-mount specimens. Radiology 1994; 190: 323-7
9. Jager GJ, Ruijter ETG, van De Kaa CA et al. Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology. Am J Roentgen 1996; 166: 845-52
10. Schnall MD, Imai Y, Tomaszceoski J, Pollack HM, Lenkinski RE, Kressel HY. Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 178: 797-802
11. Chelsky MJ, Schnall MD, Seidmon EJ, Pollack HM. Use of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. J Urol 1993; 150: 391-5
12. Outwater E, Peterson RO, Siegelman ES, Gomella LG, Chernesky CE, Mitchell DG. Prostate carcinoma assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images. Radiology 1994; 193: 333-9
13. Schroeder FH, Hermanek P, Denis L, Fair WR, Gospodarowicz MK, Pavone-Macaluso M. The TNM classification of prostate cancer. Prostate 1992; 4: 129-38
14. Walsh PC, Lepor H. The role of radical prostatectomy in the management of prostate cancer. Cancer 1989; 60: 526-37
15. Scardino PT. Early detection of prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 635-55
16. Fair WR, Kadman D. Carcinoma of the prostate diagnosis and staging: current status and future prospects. World J Urol 1983; 1: 3-18
17. Golambu M, Morales P, Al-Askari SA, Shulman Y. CAT scanning in staging of prostatic cancer. Urology 1981; 18: 305-8
18. Platt JF, Bree RL, Schwab RE. The accuracy of CT in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Roentgen 1987; 149: 315-8
19. Rifkin M, Zerhouni E, Gatsonis C et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. Results of a multi-institutional cooperative trial. New Engl J Med 1990; 323: 621-6
20. Bezzi M, Kressel HY, Allen KS et al. Prostatic carcinoma: staging with MR at 1.5 T. Radiology 1988; 169: 339-46
21. Hricak H, Dooms GC, Jeffrey RB et al. Prostatic carcinoma: staging by clinical assessment, CT, MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 162: 331-6
22. Biondetti PR, Lee JKT, Ling D, Catalona WJ. Clinical stage B prostate carcinoma: staging with MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 162: 235-9
23. Schnall MD, Lenkinski RL, Pollack HM, Imai Y, Kressel HY. Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. Radiology 1989; 172: 570-4
24. Hricak H, White S, Vigneron D et al. Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Radiology 1994; 193: 703-9
25. Tempany CM, Zhou X, Zerhouni EA et al. Staging of prostate cancer: results of Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group Project comparison of three MR imaging techniques. Radiology 1994; 192: 47-54
26. Jager GJ, de Barentsz JO, de la Rosette JJ et al. Preliminary results of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. Radiologe 1994; 34: 129-33
27. Presti JC, Hricak H, Narayan PA, Shinohara K, White S, Carroll PR. Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging. Am J Roentgen 1996; 166: 103-8
28. Langlotz CP, Schnall MD, Malkowicz JB, Tomaszewski JE. Prediction of subsequent prostate carcinoma recurrence with preoperative staging with MR imaging: results of 3-year follow-up (abstract). Radiology 1994; 193: 316A
29. Demlow TA, Quinn SF, Franzini DA, Rosencranz DR, Szumowski J, Kim J. MR imaging of the prostate with endorectal surface coil technique and whole mount correlation (abstract). Radiology 1993; 189: 251A
30. Perrotti M, Kaufman RP Jr, Jennings TA et al. Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in clinicall localized prostate cancer: is it accurate? J Urol 1996; 156: 106-9