Autopsy result utilization. A college of american pathologists q-probes study of 256 laboratories

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 290-295

  Nakhleh, Raouf E ^a   Baker, Peter B ^b   Zarbo, Richard J ^a  

^a HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; LABORATORY PERSONNEL; LENGTH OF STAY; ORGAN DONOR; PATHOLOGIST; QUALITY CONTROL;

AUTOPSY; HUMANS; LABORATORIES, HOSPITAL; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDICAL RECORDS; PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL;

EID: 0032932602     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Anderson RE, Hill RB, Key CR. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics during five decades: toward an understanding of necessary fallibility. JAMA. 1989;261:1610-1617.
2. Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 1983;308:1000-1005.
3. Landefeld CS, Chren MM, Myers A, Celler R, Robbins S, Goldman L. Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1249-1254.
4. Schwartz DA, Herman CJ. The importance of the autopsy in emerging and reemerging infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23:248-254.
5. Anderson RE, Hill RB, Gorstein F. A model for the autopsy-based quality assessment of medical diagnostics. Hum Pathol. 1990;21:174-182.