Development and validation of the injury severity assessment survey/parent report: A new injury severity assessment survey

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

Volumn 153, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 404-408

  Durbin, Dennis R ^a,b   Winston, Flaura K ^c   Applegate, Shelley M ^c   Moll, Elisa K ^c   Holmes, John H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILDHOOD INJURY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INJURY SCALE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TELEPHONE;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; MALE; PARENTS; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TELEPHONE;

EID: 0032927055     PISSN: 10724710     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Agass M, Mant D, Fuller A, Coulter A, Jones L. Childhood accidents: a practice survey using general practitioners' records and parental reports Br J Gen Pract. 1990;40:202-205.
2. Harel Y, Overpeck MD, Jones DH, et al. The effects of recall on estimating annual nonfatal injury rates for children and adolescents. Am J Public Health. 1994; 84:599-605.
3. Gofin R, Hass T, Adler B. The development of disability scales for childhood and adolescent injuries. J Clin Epidemiol, 1995;48:977-984.
4. Williams JM, Derk SJ, Furbee PM. Injury in West Virginia: a statewide study. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3:911-916.
5. Low JM, Griffith GR, Alston CL. Australian farm work injuries: incidence, diversity, and personal risk factors. Aust J Rural Health. 1996;4:179-189.
6. Macarthur C, Dougherty G, Pless IB. Reliability and validity of proxy respondent information about childhood injury: an assessment of a Canadian surveillance system. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:834-841.
7. Committee on Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety. Rating the severity of tissue damage. I: the abbreviated scale. JAMA. 1971;215:277-280.
8. Partyka SC. A comparison of AIS and ISS predictions on fatality of NCSS. Am Assoc Auto Med Proc. October 7-9, 1980:156-169.
9. MacKenzie EJ, Steinwachs DM, Shankar BS, Turney SZ. An ICD-9-CM to AIS conversion table: development and application. Presented at: 30th Annual Proceedings. American Association for Automotive Medicine; October 6-8, 1986; Montreal, Quebec.
10. Winston RK, Durbin DR, Arbogast KB, et al. A comprehensive surveillance system to investigate targeted issues in child occupant protection. Presented at: 16th Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference; June 2, 1998; Windsor, Ontario.
11. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1990 Revision. Des Plaines, III: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; 1990.
12. Dunn G. Design and Analysis of Reliability Studies, 6th Edition. London, England: Hodder & Stoughton; 1989.
13. Pless C, Pless IB. How well they remember: the accuracy of parent reports. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:553-558.