메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 93, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 692-696

Comparison of three sonographic circumference measurement techniques to predict birth weight

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS; FETUS WEIGHT; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032926788     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006250-199905000-00012     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (19)

References (7)
  • 1
    • 0021339720 scopus 로고
    • Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements.
    • Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 1984; 150:535-40.
    • (1984) Radiology , vol.150 , pp. 535-40
    • Hadlock, F.P.1    Harrist, R.B.2    Carpenter, R.J.3    Deter, R.L.4    Park, S.K.5
  • 2
    • 0021967725 scopus 로고
    • Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurementsA prospective study.
    • Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements—A prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:333-7.
    • (1985) Am J Obstet Gynecol , vol.151 , pp. 333-7
    • Hadlock, F.P.1    Harrist, R.B.2    Sharman, R.S.3    Deter, R.L.4    Park, S.K.5
  • 3
    • 0022536358 scopus 로고
    • Ultrasonic fetal abdominal circumference: Comparison of direct versus calculated measurement.
    • Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE, Pan WH, Vaisrub N. Ultrasonic fetal abdominal circumference: Comparison of direct versus calculated measurement. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:833-5.
    • (1986) Obstet Gynecol , vol.67 , pp. 833-5
    • Tamura, R.K.1    Sabbagha, R.E.2    Pan, W.H.3    Vaisrub, N.4
  • 4
    • 0026543397 scopus 로고
    • Sonographic diagnosis of the large for gestational age fetus at term: Does it make a difference?
    • Levine AB, Lockwood CJ, Brown B, Lapinski R, Berkowitz RL. Sonographic diagnosis of the large for gestational age fetus at term: Does it make a difference? Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:55-8.
    • (1992) Obstet Gynecol , vol.79 , pp. 55-8
    • Levine, A.B.1    Lockwood, C.J.2    Brown, B.3    Lapinski, R.4    Berkowitz, R.L.5
  • 5
    • 0029859887 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The effectiveness and cost of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound.
    • Rouse DJ, Owen J, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP. The effectiveness and cost of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. JAMA 1996;276:1480-6.
    • (1996) JAMA , vol.276 , pp. 1480-6
    • Rouse, D.J.1    Owen, J.2    Goldenberg, R.L.3    Cliver, S.P.4
  • 7
    • 0024561762 scopus 로고
    • Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulas targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
    • Sabbagha RE, Minogue J, Tamura RK, Hungerford SA. Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulas targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:854-62.
    • (1989) Am J Obstet Gynecol , vol.160 , pp. 854-62
    • Sabbagha, R.E.1    Minogue, J.2    Tamura, R.K.3    Hungerford, S.A.4


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.