Specialized prostheses for activities: An update

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 361, Issue , 1999, Pages 63-70

  Romo, H Duane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DYNAMICS; FOOT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0032924962     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199904000-00009     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Alaranta H, Kinnunen A, Karkkainen M, Pohjolainen T, Heliovaara M: Practical benefits of Flex-Foot™ in below-knee amputees. J Prosthet Orthot 3:179-181, 1990.
2. Barth DG, Schumacher L, Thomas SS: Gait analysis and energy cost of below-knee amputees wearing six different prosthetic feet. J Prosthet Orthot 4:63-75, 1991.
3. Colburne RG, Naumann S, Longmuir PE, Berbrayer D: Analysis of mechanical and metabolic factors in the gait of congenital below knee amputees. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 71:272-278, 1992.
4. Ehara Y, Beppu M, Monura S, Kunimi Y, Takahashi S: Energy storing property of so-called energy-storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:68-72, 1992.
5. Gitter A, Czerniecki JM, DeGroot DM: Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 70:142-148, 1991.
6. Lehmann JF, Price R, Boswell-Bessette S, Dralle A, Questad K: Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/LiteFoot versus SACH Foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:853-861, 1993.
7. Lehmann JF, Price R, Boswell-Bessette S, et al: Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot versus Standard SACH Foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:1225-1231, 1993.
8. Macfarlane PA, Nielsen DH, Shurr DG, Meier K: Perception of walking difficulty by below-knee amputees using a conventional foot versus the Flex-Foot™. J Prosthet Orthot 3:114-119, 1990.
9. Menard MR, McBride ME, Sanderson DJ, Murray DD: Comparative biomechanical analysis of energy-storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73:451-458, 1992.
10. Michael JW: Energy storing feet: A clinical comparison. Clin Prosthet Orthot 2:154-168, 1987.
11. Michael JW: Prosthetic feet: Options for the older client. Top Geriatr Rehabil 8:30-38, 1992.
12. Perry JA, Boyd LA, Sreesha SR, Mulroy SJ: Prosthetic weight acceptance mechanics in transtibial amputees wearing the Single Axis, Seattle Lite and Flex-Foot™. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 5:283-289, 1997.
13. Powers CM, Torburn L, Perry J, Ayyappa E: Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:825-829, 1994.
14. Snyder RD, Powers CM, Fontaine C, Perry J: The effect of five prosthetic feet on gait in dysvascular below-knee amputees. J Rehabil Res Dev 32:309-315, 1995.
15. Viosca AC, Hoyos JP, Sanchez-Lacuesta J: Optimisation of the prescription for transtibial (TT) amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 21:168-174, 1997.