The effects of midazolam on pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, and audiological reaction times in human volunteers

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 1064-1068

  Kelly, Dermot J ^a,b   Walsh, Fergus ^a   Norman, Gary S ^a   Cunningham, Anthony J ^a  

^a BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^b ST VINCENT S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM; PLACEBO; SEDATIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SEDATION;

ADULT; ANTI-ANXIETY AGENTS; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDIOMETRY, SPEECH; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDAZOLAM; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0032924938     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199905000-00017     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Schwender D, Klasing S, Madler C, et al. Effects of benzodiazepines on mid-latency auditory evoked potentials. Can J Anaesth 1993;40:1148-54.
2. Reinsel RA, Veselis RA, Heino R, et al. Effect of midazolam on the auditory event-related potential: measures of selective attention. Anesth Analg 1991;73:612-8.
3. Lader M. Effects of psychotropic drugs on auditory evoked potentials in man. In: Desmedt JE, ed. Auditory evoked potentials in man: psychopharmacology correlates of evoked potential. Basel: Karger, 1977:142-57:
4. Hall JW III. Effect of stimulus factors. In: Hall JW III, ed. Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1992.
5. McPherson D. Neuropathological findings of the long latency auditory evoked potentials. In: McPherson D, ed. Late potentials of the auditory system. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishings, 1996:101-22.
6. Eisenberg L, Taub HA, Burana A. Memory under diazepammorphine neuroleptanesthesia in male surgical patients. Anesth Analg 1974;53:488-95.
7. Russel IF. Midazolam-alfentanil: an anaesthetic? An investigation using the isolated forearm technique. Br J Anaesth 1993;70: 42-6.
8. De Roode A, Jelicic M, Bonke B, Boville JG. The effect of midazolam premedication on implicit memory activation during alfentanil-nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1995;50:191-4.
9. American National Standards Institute. Criteria for permissible ambient noise during audiometric testing. ANSI 1997;53:1-4.
10. British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedures for pure tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. Br J Audiol 1981;15:213-6.
11. Boothroyd A. Developments in speech audiometry. Sound 1968; 2:3-10.
12. Lutman ME. Diagnostic audiometry. In: Kerr AG, ed. Scott-Brown's otolaryngology. Vol 2. London: Butterworths, 1987.
13. Smith MT, Eadie MJ, O'Rourke Brophy T. The pharmacokinetics of midazolam in man. Clin Pharmacol 1981;19:271-8.
14. Hall JW III. Basic audiometry, handbook of auditory evoked responses. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1992:337.
15. Neary WJ, Newton VE, Laoide-Kemp SN, et al. A clinical, genetic and audiological study of patients and families with unilateral vestibular schwannomas. II. Audiological findings in 93 patients with unilateral vestibular schwannomas. J Laryngol Otol 1996;110:1120-8.
16. Allonen H, Ziegler G, Klotz U. Midazolam kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981;30:653-61.
17. Bill KM, Fee JPH, Clare RSJ. Psychomotor and clinical assessment of flumazenil as an antagonist of midazolam. J R Soc Med 1991;84:277-9.
18. Thapar P, Zacny JP, Choi M, Apfelpaum JL. Objective and subjective impairment from often used sedative/analgesic combinations in ambulatory surgery, using alcohol as a benchmark. Anesth Analg 1995;80:1092-8.
19. Domino EF, French J, Pohorecki R, et al. Further observations on the effects of subhypnotic doses of midazolam in normal volunteers. Psychopharmacol Bull 1989;25:460-5.
20. Sarma SK, Bradshaw EG, Pandit SK, et al. The relation between lorazepam-induced auditory amnesia and auditory evoked potentials. Anesth Analg 1988;67:526-33.