Surgical revision of glaucoma shunt implants

Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 41-46

  Tsai, James C ^a   Grajewski, Alana L ^b   Parrish II, Richard K ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EYE SURGERY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHUNTING; SURGICAL DRAINAGE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; FILTERING SURGERY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANTS; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032923914     PISSN: 10823069     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Molteno ACB. The use of draining implants in resistant cases of glaucoma: late results of 110 operations. Trans Ophthal Soc NZ. 1983;35:94-97.
2. Minckler DS, Heuer DK, Hasty B, et al. Clinical experience with the single-plate Molteno implant in complicated glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:1181-1188.
3. Lieberman MF, Ewing RH. Drainage implant surgery for refractory glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1990;30:198-208.
4. Lloyd MA, Sedlak T, Heuer DK, et al. Clinical experience with the single-plate Molteno implant in complicated glaucomas. Update of a pilot study. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:679-687.
5. Heuer DK, Lloyd MA, Abrams DA, et al. Which is better? One or two? A randomized clinical trial of single-plate versus double-plate Molteno implantation for glaucomas in aphakia and pseudophakia. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1512-1519.
6. Melamed S, Cahane M, Gutman I, Blumenthal M. Postoperative complications after Molteno implant surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:319-322.
7. Schocket SS, Nirankari VS, Lakhanpal V, et al. Anterior chamber tube shunt to an encircling band in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma and other refractory glaucomas: a long-term study. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:553-562.
8. Mermoud A, Salmon JF, Straker C, Murray ADN. Use of the single-plate Molteno implant in refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 1992;205:113-120.
9. Sherwood MB, Joseph NH, Hitchings RA. Surgery for refractory glaucoma. Results and complications with a modified Schocket technique. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:562-569.
10. Singh K, Eid TE, Katz LJ, et al. Evaluation of Nd:YAG Laser Membranectomy in Blocked Tubes After Glaucoma Tube-Shunt Surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:781-786.
11. Mermoud A, Salmon JF, Alexander P, et al. Molteno tube implantation for neovascular glaucoma. Long-term results and factors influencing the outcome. Ophthalmology. 1993; 100: 897-902.
12. Wilson RP. The Schocket Shunt. Ophthalmolgic Clinics of North America. 1988;1:225-232.
13. Krupin T, Kaufman P, Mandell AI, et al. Long-term results of valve implants in filtering surgery for eyes with neovascular glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;95:775-782.
14. Lavin MJ, Franks WA, Wormald RPL, Hitchings RA. Clinical risk factors for failure in glaucoma tube surgery. A comparison of three tube designs. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:480-485.
15. Freedman J, Rubin B. Molteno implants as a treatment for refractory glaucoma in black patients. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1417-1420.
16. Perkins TW, Gangnon R, Ladd W, et al. Molteno implant with mitomycin C: intermediate-term results. J Glaucoma. 1998; 7: 86-92.