Shear-lag simulation of the progress of interfacial debonding in unidirectional composites

Composites Science and Technology

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 77-88

  Ochiai, Shojiro ^a   Hojo, Masaki ^a   Inoue, Tadanobu ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

B. Debonding; B. Interface; C. Computational simulation; C. Damage mechanism

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTERFACIAL ENERGY; SHEAR STRESS; STRESS ANALYSIS;

ENERGY RELEASE RATE CRITERIA; INTERFACIAL DEBONDING; SHEAR LAG SIMULATION; UNIDIRECTIONAL COMPOSITES;

FIBER REINFORCED MATERIALS;

COMPOSITE; DEBONDING; FIBER-MATRIX INTERFACE;

EID: 0032922878     PISSN: 02663538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00054-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Zhou L.M., Kim J.K., Mai Y.W. Interfacial debonding and fiber pull-out stresses. J Mater Sci. 27:1992;3155-3166.
2. Hsueh C.H. Interfacial debonding and fiber pull-out stresses of fiber-reinforced composites. Mater Sci Engn. A154:1992;125-132.
3. Lauke B.W., Beckert W., Singletary J. Energy release rate and stress field calculation for debonding crack extension at the fibre-matrix interface during single-fibre pull-out. Comp Interfaces. 3:1996;263-273.
4. Whitney JM, Drzal LT. Axisymmetric stress distribution around an isolated fibre fragment. Toughened composites, ASTM STP 937. 3rd. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1987, pp. 176-196.
5. Henstenburg R.B., Phoenix S.L. Interfacial shear strength studies using single filament composite test. Polym Comp. 10:1989;389-408.
6. Drzal L.T. The effect of polymer matrix mechanical properties on the fibre-matrix interfacial strength. Mater Sci Engn. A126:1990;2890-2893.
7. Fabre J.P., Sigety P., Jacques D. Stress transfer by shear in carbon fiber model composites. J Mater Sci. 26:1991;189-195.
8. Oh K.P. A Monte Carlo study of the strength of unidirectional fiber-reinforced Composites. J Comp Mater. 13:1979;311-328.
9. Hedgepeth JM. Stress concentrations in filamentary structures, NASA TN D-882, Washington, 1961.
10. Goree J.G., Gross R.S. Analysis of a unidirectional composite containing broken fibers and matrix damage. Eng Frac Mech. 13:1980;563-578.
11. Dharani L.R., Jones W.F., Goree J.G. Mathematical modeling of damage in unidirectional composites. Eng Frac Mech. 17:1983;555-573.
12. Reedy Jr E.D. Fiber stresses in a cracked monolayer:comparison of shear-lag and 3-D finite element predictions. J Comp Mater. 18:1984;595-607.
13. Narin J.A. Fracture mechanics of unidirectional composites using shear-lag model I: theory. J Comp Mater. 22:1988;561-588.
14. Ochiai S., Tokinori K., Osamura K., Nakatani E., Yamatsuta K. Stress concentration at a notch-tip in unidirectional metal matrix composites. Met Trans. 22A:1991;2085-2095.
15. Ochiai S., Schulte K., Peters P.W.M. Strain concentration factors for fibers and matrix in unidirectional composites. Comp Sci Tech. 44:1991;237-256.
16. Ochiai S., Hojo M. Stress disturbances arising from cut fiber and matrix in unidirectional metal matrix composites calculated by means of a modified shear lag analysis. J Mater Sci. 31:1996;3861-3869.
17. Ochiai S., Hojo M., Schulte K., Fiedler B. A shear-lag approach to the early stage of interfacial failure in the fiber direction in notched two-dimensional unidirectional composites. Comp Sci Tech. 57:1997;775-785.
18. He M., Hutchinson J.W. Crack deflection at an interface between dissimilar elastic materials. Intern J Solids Struct. 25:1989;1053-1067.
19. Cao H.C., Bischoff E., Sbaizero O., Ruehle M., Evans A.G. Effects of interfaces on the properties of fiberreinforced ceramics. J Amer Ceram Soc. 73:1990;1691-1699.
20. Evans A.G. The mechanical properties of reinforced ceramic, metal and intermetallic matrix composites. Mater Sci Engn. A107:1989;227-241.