Behavioral resistance to haloperidol and clozapine

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-13

  Harper, David N ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Clozapine; Haloperidol; Multiple schedules; Resistance to change

Indexed keywords

CLOZAPINE; HALOPERIDOL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOD; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; MALE; NONHUMAN; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; RAT; REINFORCEMENT;

EID: 0032922050     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-6357(98)00056-4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cohen S.L. A pharmacological examination of the resistance-to-change hypothesis of response strength. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 46:1986;363-379.
2. Egli M., Schaal D.W., Thompson T., Cleary J. Opioid-induced response-rate decrements in pigeons responding under variable-interval schedules: reinforcement mechanisms. Behav. Pharmacol. 3:1992;581-591.
3. 2 receptors in the effects of the classical neuroleptic haloperidol and the atypical neuroleptic clozapine. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 196:1991;103-108.
4. Fouriezos G., Wise R.A. Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits. Brain Res. 103:1976;377-380.
5. Gingrich J.A., Caron M.G. Recent advances in the molecular biology of dopamine receptors. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 16:1993;299-321.
6. Harper D.N. Response-independent food delivery and behavioral resistance to change. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 65:1996;549-560.
7. Harper, D.N., 1998. Drug-induced changes in responding are dependent upon baseline stimulus-reinforcer contingencies. Psychobiology (in press).
8. Harper D.N., McLean A.P. Resistance to change and the law of effect. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 57:1992;317-337.
9. Lucki I., DeLong R.E. Control rate of response or reinforcement and amphetamine's effect on behavior. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 54:1983;163-172.
10. Mace F.C., Lalli J.S., Shea M.C., Lalli E.P., West B.J., Roberts M., Nevin J.A. The momentum of human behavior in a natural setting. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 54:1990;163-172.
11. Mauro B.C., Mace F.C. Differences in the effect of Pavlovian contingencies upon behavioral momentum using auditory versus visual stimuli. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 65:1996;389-399.
12. McLean A.P., Blampied N.M. Resistance to reinforcement change in multiple and concurrent schedules assessed in transition and steady state. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 63:1995;1-17.
13. McLean A.P., Campbell-Tie P., Nevin J.A. Resistance to change as a function of stimulus-reinforcer and location-reinforcer contingencies. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 66:1996;169-191.
14. Nevin J.A. Response strength in multiple schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 21:1974;389-408.
15. Nevin J.A. Pavlovian determiners of behavioral momentum. Anim. Learn. Behav. 12:1984;363-370.
16. Nevin J.A. An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 57:1992;301-316.
17. Nevin J.A., Mandell C., Atak J.R. The analysis of behavioral momentum. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 39:1983;49-59.
18. Nevin J.A., Tota M.E., Torquato R.D., Shull R.L. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies? J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 53:1990;359-379.
19. Olds M.E., Fobes J.L. The central basis of motivation: Intracranial self-stimulation studies. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 32:1981;523-574.
20. Rees D.C., Wood R.W., Laties V.G. The roles of stimulus control and reinforcement frequency in modulating the behavioral effects of D-amphetamine in the rat. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 43:1985;243-255.
21. Rolls E.T., Rolls B.J., Kelly P.H., Shaw S.G., Wood R.J., Dale R. The relative attenuation of self-stimulation, eating and drinking produced by dopamine-receptor blockade. Psychopharmacologia. 38:1974;219-230.
22. Sanger D.J., Blackman D.E. Rate-dependent effects of drugs: a review of the literature. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 4:1976;73-83.
23. 4 receptor with high affinity for the antipsychotic clozapine. Nature. 350:1991;610-614.
24. Wise R.A., Bozarth M.A. A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol. Rev. 94:1987;469-492.